Skip to content

· Private foundation

Solid Rock Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$40k
Granted FY2021
19
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$5k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of Solid Rock Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Park County Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Solid Rock Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 15 organizations, $40k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
’17
15
’18
17
’19
18
’20
15
’21
4
’22
2
’23
5
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$63kPhilanthropy$56kHuman Services$28kHealth$24kFood & Nutrition$19kInternational$14kCrime & Legal$12kHousing & Shelter$12kOther$0
02FY2021 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,750
Median grant
2
States reached
$662k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTERN SUSTAINABILITY EXCHANGE$5,000
PARK CNTY FRIENDS OF THE ARTS(PCFA)$5,000
ASPEN$5,000
COUNTERPOINT INC$3,250
ASPEN MUSIC FESTIVAL & SCHOOL$3,000
LIVINGSTON FOOD RESOURCE CENTER$2,500
FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY$2,000
FRIENDS OF THE COMMUNITY INC$2,000
GLOBAL MIDWIFE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,750
FAST BLACKFEET$1,500
LOAVES & FISHES OF LIVINGSTON$1,500
THE MONTANA RACIAL EQUITY PROJECT$1,000
THE HRDC$1,000
MONTANA FREE PRESS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YWCA MISSOULA: $1k → 9%YWCA MISSOULA: $400 → 9%LIVINGSTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%LIVINGSTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%LIVINGSTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $250 → 10%LIVINGSTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $250 → 10%LIVINGSTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $250 → 10%LIVINGSTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $200 → 10%LIVINGSTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $150 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$184k · 32 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +54% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2021, 18 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
9

Total granted

$184k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+54%

Still filing today

59%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    Livingston Healthcare Foundation
    6× · 2017–2022 · $21k · revenue +65%
  • MA
    MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $16k · revenue +141%
  • AS
    ASPEN-ABUSE SUPPORT & PREVENTION EDUCATION NETWORK
    3× · 2017–2021 · $11k · revenue +706%

Funded once

  • MF
    MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +40%
  • LR
    LIVINGSTON ROTARY CLUB FNDT
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • MD
    MISSOULA DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICE CORPgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Greater Montana Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Montana Healthcare Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Montana Center for the Arts

Montana center for the arts purpose is to nurture, promote and expand cultural engagement and opportunity in our region. through collaboration with the community at large, and in partnership with the area's diverse cultural and educational…

Arts & Culture
4
Montana Business Leadership Council

The mblc exists to encourage and enact business-friendly policies that create good-paying jobs and make montana a better place to live. the primary purpose of the mblc is to educate the public on important business issues, enable citizens…

Community Improvement
5
Scenic Montana Trails
—
6
Rural Resilience

The organization's mission is to connect rural students, families, and community members to behavioral and mental health solutions while protecting their social well-being and fostering a resilience to thrive.

Health
7
Montana Continuum of Care Coalition

The purpose of the montana continuum of care coalition is to end homelessness in montana through effective leadership and collaboration. (to make homelessness in montana rare, brief and non-recurring)

Housing & Shelter
8
Wyoming Food Coalition Wy Food Matters
Food & Nutrition
9
Montana Preservation Alliance Inc

The montana preservation alliance (mpa) saves and protects montana's historic places, traditional landscapes, and cultural heritage. we are the only statewide, not-for-profit organization dedicated to providing montanans with the resources…

—
10
Livingston Depot Foundation Inc

The livingston depot foundation is a non-profit organization committed to enriching the lives of residents of livingston and surrounding, communities, and tourists to the yellowstone area by: 1. restoring, preserving and protecting the…

Arts & Culture
11
Montana Indigenous Food Sovereignty Initiative

To collaborate with people across the state on local, regenerative, and culturally specific food systems that aim to protect, cultivate, distribute, and increase access to indigenous foods through the exchange of knowledge, skills, and…

Food & Nutrition
12
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Poverello Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Counterpoint Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
21/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARK CNTY FRIENDS OF THE ARTS(PCFA): $17,000 · OtherPARK CNTY FRIENDS OF THE ARTS(PCFA)Counterpoint Inc: $7,650 · OtherCounterpoint IncBLUE SLIPPER THEATRE: $6,500 · OtherBLUE SLIPPER THEATREPARK COUNTY WINDRIDER TRANSIT: $6,000 · OtherPARK COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $5,900 · OtherASPEN (WOMAN'S SHELTER): $5,150 · OtherCHILD CARE CONNECTIONS INC: $5,000 · OtherYELLOWSTONE GATEWAY MUSEUM: $5,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE COMMUNITY INC: $8,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE COMMUNITY INCWESTERN SUSTAINABILITY EXCHANGE: $5,000 · Other+30 more: $48,000 · Other+30 morePARK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $55,700 · PhilanthropyPARK COUNTY COMMUNITY F…MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC: $16,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC ASSOC…The Shane Lalani Center for the Arts: $6,000 · Arts & CultureThe Shane L…CROW LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCROW LANGUA…LIVINGSTON CENTER FOR ART AND CULTURE INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureLIVINGSTON …MONTANA FREE PRESS: $1,300 · Arts & CultureZOOTOWN ARTS COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,000 · Arts & CultureLivingston Healthcare Foundation: $21,100 · Human ServicesLivingston…FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PRO…YWCA MISSOULA: $1,400 · Human ServicesYWCA MISSO…LIVINGSTON FOOD PANTRY OF PARK COUNTY: $6,500 · Food & NutritionLOAVES AND FISHES: $6,350 · Food & NutritionMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC: $3,500 · Food & NutritionFAST BLACKFEET: $2,500 · Food & NutritionGLOBAL MIDWIFE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $14,000 · HealthPAYDEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthASPEN-ABUSE SUPPORT & PREVENTION EDUCATION NETWORK: $11,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$119,200Philanthropy$55,700Arts & Culture$28,300Human Services$24,500Food & Nutrition$18,850Health$16,000Crime & Legal$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $55,700 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLivingston Healthcare Foundation: $21,100 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC: $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL MIDWIFE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetASPEN-ABUSE SUPPORT & PREVENTION EDUCATION NETWORK: $11,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE COMMUNITY INC: $8,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetCounterpoint Inc: $7,650 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLIVINGSTON FOOD PANTRY OF PARK COUNTY: $6,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Shane Lalani Center for the Arts: $6,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHILD CARE CONNECTIONS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN SUSTAINABILITY EXCHANGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMONTANA RACIAL EQUITY PROJECT: $3,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOVERELLO CENTER INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFAST BLACKFEET: $2,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPAYDEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetCROW LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIVINGSTON CENTER FOR ART AND CULTURE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSTAFFORD ANIMAL SHELTER: $1,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA MISSOULA: $1,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTANA FREE PRESS: $1,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOULA DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICE CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZOOTOWN ARTS COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBozeman Field School Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLOSET INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPark County Environmental Council: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Livingston Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL MIDWIFE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN-ABUSE SUPPORT & PREVENTION EDUCATION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Counterpoint Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON FOOD PANTRY OF PARK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES ↗
  • Who funds The Shane Lalani Center for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds PARK COUNTY SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CARE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN SUSTAINABILITY EXCHANGE ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA RACIAL EQUITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds POVERELLO CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FAST BLACKFEET ↗
  • Who funds PAYDEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CROW LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON CENTER FOR ART AND CULTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds STAFFORD ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds YWCA MISSOULA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Park County Community FoundationMT34.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Park County Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Kendeda Fund · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Charlotte & Edward K Wheeler Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Glassybaby Foundation · The McNeely Foundation · The Stake Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Solid Rock Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Solid Rock Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Solid Rock’s filings →

    More from the funding graph