Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sodhani Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$374k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$863kEducation$498kHuman Services$200kHealth$192kArts & Culture$87kFood & Nutrition$75kReligion$52kHousing & Shelter$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $137k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $210k
$14,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHIKSHIT ROJGAR KENDRA PRABHANDAK SAMITI (SRKPS)$210,215
SEWA INTERNATIONAL$44,880
FRIENDS OF MUSIQUE ET VIN$32,500
AS FOUNDATION DAF AT SCHWAT$25,000
VAIDYA BHARATEE FOUNDATION$21,050
MASSBAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$14,000
SHARE YOUR CARE INC$6,000
MEALS ON WHEELS SAN FRANCISCO$5,000
VISHWA HINDU PARISHAD OF AMERICA$5,000
HUMANMADE$5,000
HINDUPEDIA CORP$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $894k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NORTH HAWAII HOSPICE: $3k → 15%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $149k → 16%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $115k → 16%INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC: $20k → 8%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $100k → 16%SEWA INTERNATIONAL USA: $99k → 16%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $67k → 16%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $53k → 16%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $45k → 16%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $44k → 16%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $35k → 16%INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA: $45k → 8%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $24k → 16%INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA: $15k → 8%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 16%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $18k → 16%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $12k → 16%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $12k → 16%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $9k → 16%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $7k → 16%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
NC
SC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Sodhani Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Sodhani Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 26% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 12 repeat orgs$934k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +101% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
41

Total granted

$1.2M
$629k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%
-9%

Still filing today

58%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $305k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationPhilanthropyEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    Sewa International Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $816k · revenue +101%
  • IC
    INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $80k · revenue +112% · 34% of their budget
  • VH
    VISHWA HINDU PARISHAD OF AMERICA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $27k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • EV
    EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA
    one grant, 2018 · $101k · revenue +22%
  • OH
    Om Hindu community center
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • VB
    VAIDYA BHARTEE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $61k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shiv Nadar Foundation

Shiv Nadar Foundation provides access to higher education tounderprivileged students and funds to other charitable organizations to supporteducation, research, social policies for women empowerment, affordable healthcareservices, medical…

Education
2
India Foundation

Healthcare and education for the needy

Human Services
3
Vedic Sadhana Foundation

Promoting well being of individuals through the education and assistance of mindful living, meditation, and education of vedic and indian practices.

Education
4
Sai Spiritual Foundation

Help establish unity of faith and welcome all spiritual seekers of all religions; realize the Inherent Divinity within as per Sathya SaiBaba

Religion
5
Dasra

Dasra is catalyzing the strategic philanthropy movement to ensure that a billion lives can thrive with dignity and equity. dasra works with philanthropists, families, and corporate foundations to support them in amplifying their giving…

International
6
Sanatan Dharm Mandir

Hindu religious organization

Religion
7
India Development and Relief Fund Inc

Provide social development and relief assistance to underprivileged people primarily in india but also in nepal, sri lanka and the usa

International
8
Indiaspora

Transforming the success of the indian diaspora into meaningful impact worldwide.

Human Services
9
Vishwa Nirmala Dharma

Advance & propagate the understanding, practices & the maintenance of the spiritual teachings of sahaja religion as taught by shri mataji nirmala devi.

—
10
4 S Foundation Inc

Educate, train, and provide assistance to create water systems and provide healthcare facilities for the poor population in india.

—
11
Dharma Civilization Foundation Inc

To establish the systematic academic study of dharma, its interpretation and application through the creation of academic and intellectual infrastructure and institutions.

Religion
12
Friends of Aravind Inc Dba Aravind Eye Foundation Inc

The purpose of the corporation is to engage in such activity as may be necessary, appropriate or otherwise helpful to support, provide assistance to or perform functions of aravind eye hospital and postgraduate institute of ophthamology…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sankara Eye Foundation Usa; the most unlike its peers is Institute for Civilizational Studies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
11/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHIKSHIT ROJGAR KENDRA PRABHANDAK SAMITI (SRKPS): $210,215 · OtherSHIKSHIT ROJGAR KENDRA PRABHANDAK SAMITI (SRKPS)INDUS: $109,260 · OtherINDUSOm Hindu community center: $100,000 · OtherOm Hindu community centerVAIDYA BHARTEE FOUNDATION: $61,060 · OtherVAIDYA BHARTEE FOUNDATIONVAIDYA BHARATEE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $50,000 · OtherMASSBAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $36,000 · Other+41 more: $471,805 · Other+41 moreSewa International Inc: $815,921 · Human ServicesSewa International IncINDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC (ICC): $80,000 · Human ServicesINDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC (ICC)+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $101,250 · InternationalFRIENDS OF FONDATION DE FRANCE INC: $5,000 · InternationalSt Helena Hospital Foundation: $15,000 · HealthCURE DUCHENNE: $5,000 · HealthONE MIND: $5,000 · HealthSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $3,200 · HealthAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $25,000 · Food & NutritionShare Your Care Inc: $6,000 · EmploymentHUMANMADE: $5,000 · EmploymentInstitute for Civilizational Studies: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,038,340Human Services$898,921International$106,250Health$28,200Food & Nutrition$25,000Employment$11,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSewa International Inc: $815,921 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $101,250 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetINDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC (ICC): $80,000 over 3y, 34% of budgetVISHWA HINDU PARISHAD OF AMERICA INC: $27,150 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetST HELENA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $25,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF NAPA INC BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NAPA VALLEY: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSt Helena Hospital Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetInstitute for Civilizational Studies: $10,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetNAPA COUNTY FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetSHREE SANATAN DHARAM RAMAYAN MANDLI INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCURE DUCHENNE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF FONDATION DE FRANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetONE MIND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPA VALLEY FARMWORKER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $3,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH HAWAII HOSPICE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPETER MICHAEL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
  • Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC (ICC) ↗
  • Who funds VISHWA HINDU PARISHAD OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST HELENA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
  • Who funds BOYS CLUB OF NAPA INC BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NAPA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds St Helena Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Civilizational Studies ↗
  • Who funds Share Your Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds NAPA COUNTY FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHREE SANATAN DHARAM RAMAYAN MANDLI INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY12.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sodhani Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sodhani Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sodhani Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sodhani Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sodhani’s filings →

    More from the funding graph