Skip to content
Society of Friendly Sons of St Patr in the County of Westchester Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Society of Friendly Sons of St Patr in the County of Westchester Inc

The friendly sons of saint patrick of westchester county is inspired by the life of our patron saint, saint patrick.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$137kFood & Nutrition$125kReligion$105kInternational$28kEducation$10k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $37,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $80,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $43,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$98k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC$10,000
ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUND$10,000
ST JOHN VIANNEY CLERGY RESIDENCE$10,000
ST VINCENT'S HOSPITAL$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 35% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $28k → 9%SISTERS OF LIFE: $10k → 14%ST JOHN VIANNEY CLERGY RESIDENCE: $10k → 17%CARDINAL O'CONNOR CLERGY RESIDENCE: $27k → 28%FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $18k → 9%SISTERS OF LIFE: $10k → 14%ST JOHN VIANNEY CLERGY RESIDENCE: $10k → 17%ST JOHN VIANNEY CLERGY RESIDENCE: $10k → 28%FEEDING WESTCHESTER: $18k → 9%ST PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL: $10k → 17%MANHATTAN COLLEGE: $10k → 28%FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $16k → 9%ST JOHN VIANNEY CLERGY RESIDENCE: $10k → 17%FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $10k → 9%ST JOHN VIANNEY CLERGY RESIDENCE: $8k → 17%FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $10k → 9%UKRANIAN CONGRESS COMMITTEE OF AMER: $10k → 17%FEEDING WESTCHESTER: $9k → 9%UKRANIAN CONGRESS COMMITTEE OF AMER: $10k → 17%FOOD BANK FOR WESTCHESTER: $9k → 9%UKRANIAN CONGRESS COMMITTEE OF AMER: $8k → 17%FEEDING WESTCHESTER: $9k → 9%ELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTER: $35k → 9%ST JOSEPH'S MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 9%ELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTER: $12k → 9%ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUND: $10k → 9%ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUND: $10k → 9%ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUND: $10k → 9%ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUND: $10k → 9%ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUND: $10k → 9%ST VINCENT'S HOSPITAL: $7k → 9%ST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FUND: $6k → 9%ST JOSEPH'S MEDICAL CENTER: $6k → 9%ST JOSEPH'S MEDICAL CENTER: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$321k · 6 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$321k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+2%

Still filing today

83%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FW
    FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +31%
  • SE
    ST ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION LTD
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +64%
  • ES
    ELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTER
    2× · 2017–2019 · $47k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • CO
    CARDINAL O'CONNOR CLERGY RESIDENCE
    one grant, 2017 · $27k
  • SO
    SISTERS OF LIFE
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • MU
    Manhattan University
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $125,000 · OtherFEEDING WESTCHESTER INCST ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION LTD: $50,000 · OtherST ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION LTDELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTER: $47,000 · OtherELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTERNEW YORK CATHOLIC FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · OtherNEW YORK CATHOLIC FOUNDATION INCUKRAINIAN CONGRESS COMMITTEE OF AMERICA: $27,500 · OtherUKRAINIAN CONGRESS COMMITTEE OF AMERICACARDINAL O'CONNOR CLERGY RESIDENCE: $27,000 · OtherCARDINAL O'CONNOR CLERGY RESIDENCESISTERS OF LIFE: $20,000 · OtherSISTERS OF LIFE+3 more: $26,200 · Other+3 moreST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL YONKERS: $34,075 · HealthST JOSEPH…Manhattan University: $10,000 · Education
Other$360,200Health$34,075Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $125,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetST ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION LTD: $50,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTER: $47,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL YONKERS: $34,075 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINIAN CONGRESS COMMITTEE OF AMERICA: $27,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetManhattan University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FUND: $6,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION LTD ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL YONKERS ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINIAN CONGRESS COMMITTEE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Manhattan University ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Society of Friendly Sons of St Patr in the County of Westchester Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Society of Friendly Sons of St Patr in the County of Westchester Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Society of Friendly Sons of St Patr in the County of Westchester’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home