Skip to content
So Hum Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

So Hum Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
59
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$2.3MHealth$1.1MEnvironment$609kYouth Development$368kCommunity Improvement$347kAnimals$288kHuman Services$257kReligion$185kOther$0
02FY2025 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k37 grants · $192k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $287k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $641k
$5,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARAVIND EYE FOUNDATION$125,000
EVERY WOMAN TREATY$125,000
SPOON FOUNDATION$105,000
BARK$105,000
AMERICAN SERVICE TO INDIA$75,700
NEIGHBORS FOR KIDS$55,000
GLOBAL ROOTS$50,000
SELF ENHANCEMENT INC$35,000
SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS PORTLAND$31,000
NOMAD FOUNDATION$25,000
BBH EYE FOUNDATION$25,000
FOUNDATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE MAHAYANA TRADITION$22,700
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA$20,075
L'ARCHE USA$20,000
HEALING ARTS MISSION$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $364k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $21k → 16%PNR USA FOUNDATION: $16k → 8%PNR USA FOUNDATION: $13k → 8%PNR USA FOUNDATION: $8k → 8%PNR USA FOUNDATION: $8k → 8%PNR USA FOUNDATION: $8k → 8%PNR USA FOUNDATION: $8k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF LINCOLN COUNTY: $30k → 16%SPOON FOUNDATION: $105k → 12%PEACE IN SCHOOLS: $28k → 12%SPOON FOUNDATION: $16k → 12%SPOON FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%SPOON FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%SPOON FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%SPOON FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%PEACE IN SCHOOLS: $3k → 12%PEACE IN SCHOOLS: $3k → 12%PEACE IN SCHOOLS: $3k → 12%PEACE IN SCHOOLS: $3k → 12%PEACE IN SCHOOLS: $3k → 12%STORE TO DOOR: $15k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $25k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $10k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
MA
OR
SD
OH
NJ
CA
MO
VA
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of So Hum Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 46% of the giving stays in OR; by stated purpose, 44%.

So Hum Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.7M · 60 repeat orgs$455k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

60 repeat relationships: 51 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
12

Total granted

$5.7M
$372k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+10%

Still filing today

80%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ARAVIND INC DBA ARAVIND EYE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $745k · revenue +146% · 30% of their budget
  • EW
    EVERY WOMAN TREATY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $504k · revenue +63%
  • SELF ENHANCEMENT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $210k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +22%
  • BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +21%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
4
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
5
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment
6
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
7
Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc

The Fossey Fund is dedicated to the conservation and study of gorillas in Africa through a successful, people-centered approach: 1) Providing daily protection to gorillas, 2) Scientific research providing critical data on gorillas and…

—
8
International Rivers Network

International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.

Environment
9
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
10
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
11
Shelter Animal Resource Alliance

Shelter Animal Resource Alliance rescues, assists, and advocates for shelter animals in Lane County by developing and implementing programs designed to increase the number of animals adopted into permanent, loving homes and decrease the…

Animals
12
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farm Sanctuary Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shiloh Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/65
Grantees still filing
47/65
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN SERVICE TO INDIA: $522,200 · OtherAMERICAN SERVICE TO INDIAEVERYWOMAN EVERYWHERE COALITION: $500,000 · OtherEVERYWOMAN EVERYWHERE COALITIONSELF ENHANCEMENT INC: $210,000 · OtherSELF ENHANCEMENT INCOREGON SHORES CONSERVATION COALITION: $160,500 · OtherOREGON SHORES CONSERVATION COALITIONFOUNDATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE MAHAYANA TRADITION INC: $122,700 · OtherLArche USA: $111,000 · OtherDESTINY REFLECTION USA: $93,000 · OtherSRI AUROBINDO YOGA MANDIR ORPHANAGE (NEPAL): $90,000 · OtherHuman Kindness Foundation: $93,500 · Other+26 more: $731,000 · Other+26 moreEVERY WOMAN TREATY INC: $504,000 · InternationalEVERY WOMAN TREATY INCNOMAD FOUNDATION: $161,000 · InternationalNOMAD FOUNDATIONHEALING ART MISSIONS: $150,000 · InternationalHEALING ART MISSIONSMercy Corps: $100,000 · InternationalMercy CorpsGlobal Resource Alliance Inc: $80,000 · InternationalGlobal Resource Alliance…Friends of Tilonia Inc: $54,000 · InternationalMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $50,000 · InternationalGLOBAL ROOTS: $50,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $50,000 · International+5 more: $156,000 · International+5 moreFRIENDS OF ARAVIND INC DBA ARAVIND EYE FOUNDATION INC: $745,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF ARAVIND …NEIGHBORS FOR KIDS: $180,000 · HealthNEIGHBORS FOR KIDSBBH EYE FOUNDATION: $114,000 · HealthBBH EYE FOUNDATION+2 more: $64,500 · Health+2 moreSPOON FOUNDATION: $153,500 · Human ServicesPNR USA FOUNDATION INC: $61,000 · Human ServicesPEACE IN SCHOOLS: $43,000 · Human ServicesLatino Network: $40,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF LINCOLN COUNTY: $30,000 · Human ServicesSewa International Inc: $21,000 · Human ServicesSTORE TO DOOR: $15,000 · Human ServicesCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $140,525 · PhilanthropyCaravan to Class: $62,500 · PhilanthropyTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $59,703 · PhilanthropySOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS PORTLAND: $52,000 · PhilanthropyGREEN EMPOWERMENT: $35,500 · PhilanthropyBARK: $132,000 · EnvironmentOpal Creek Ancient Forest Center: $42,000 · EnvironmentPollinator Partnership: $31,500 · EnvironmentWILLAMETTE RIVERKEEPER: $28,000 · EnvironmentTHE OJAI VALLEY LAND CONSERVANCY: $26,500 · EnvironmentSightline Institute: $26,500 · EnvironmentLOS PADRES FORESTWATCH INC: $26,000 · Environment+1 more: $10,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF LINCOLN CO ANIMALS INC: $61,500 · AnimalsOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $50,500 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INC: $34,500 · AnimalsSANAGA-YONG CHIMPANZEE RESCUE: $31,000 · AnimalsWildlife Conservation Society: $29,000 · AnimalsSHILOH CHARITABLE TRUST: $28,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY: $28,000 · Animals
Other$2,633,900International$1,355,000Health$1,103,500Human Services$363,500Philanthropy$350,228Environment$322,500Animals$262,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF ARAVIND INC DBA ARAVIND EYE FOUNDATION INC: $745,000 over 6y, 30% of budgetEVERY WOMAN TREATY INC: $504,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetSELF ENHANCEMENT INC: $210,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBORS FOR KIDS: $180,000 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetNOMAD FOUNDATION: $161,000 over 6y, 43% of budgetOREGON SHORES CONSERVATION COALITION: $160,500 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetSPOON FOUNDATION: $153,500 over 6y, 8.0% of budgetHEALING ART MISSIONS: $150,000 over 6y, 9.8% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $140,525 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBARK: $132,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetBBH EYE FOUNDATION: $114,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetLArche USA: $111,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHuman Kindness Foundation: $93,500 over 6y, 11% of budgetGlobal Resource Alliance Inc: $80,000 over 6y, 9.3% of budgetCaravan to Class: $62,500 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF LINCOLN CO ANIMALS INC: $61,500 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetPNR USA FOUNDATION INC: $61,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $59,703 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Tilonia Inc: $54,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS PORTLAND: $52,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $50,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL ROOTS: $50,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DOUGY CENTER INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPEACE IN SCHOOLS: $43,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetEXCEED ENTERPRISES INC CO ALBERTINA KERR: $42,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetOpal Creek Ancient Forest Center: $42,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetLatino Network: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSRI RAMA FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetGREEN EMPOWERMENT: $35,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT AVARY INC ALTERNATIVE VENTURES FOR AT RISK YOUTH: $35,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $34,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSacred Valley Project Inc: $34,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetWINNARAINBOW INC DBA CAMP WINNARAINBOW: $34,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetLines for Life: $32,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTIBETAN AID FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 over 6y, 59% of budgetPollinator Partnership: $31,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSANAGA-YONG CHIMPANZEE RESCUE: $31,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetCENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE: $30,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LINCOLN COUNTY: $30,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $29,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Columbia Gorge: $29,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ARAVIND INC DBA ARAVIND EYE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERY WOMAN TREATY INC ↗
  • Who funds SELF ENHANCEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds NOMAD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OREGON SHORES CONSERVATION COALITION ↗
  • Who funds SPOON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALING ART MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds BARK ↗
  • Who funds BBH EYE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LArche USA ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds Human Kindness Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Global Resource Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds Caravan to Class ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LINCOLN CO ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds PNR USA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Tilonia Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS PORTLAND ↗
  • Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL ROOTS ↗
  • Who funds BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DOUGY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACE IN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds EXCEED ENTERPRISES INC CO ALBERTINA KERR ↗
  • Who funds Opal Creek Ancient Forest Center ↗
  • Who funds Latino Network ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …The Autzen FoundationMeyer Memorial TrustRose E Tucker Charita…Marie Lamfrom Charita…OCF Joseph E Weston P…The Collins FoundationThe Jackson FoundationJuan Young TrustThe Robert D and Marc…The Reser Family Foun…Patagoniaorg
The Oregon Community FoundationOR35× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Collins Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · Juan Young Trust · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · The Reser Family Foundation · Patagoniaorg

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization So Hum Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from So Hum Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Lines for Life: 70% of income from government
  • Exceed Enterprises Inc Co Albertina Kerr: 68% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Willamette Riverkeeper: 42% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Latino Network: 15% of income from government
  • Self Enhancement Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
  • Neighbors for Kids: 8% of income from government
  • Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition: 3% of income from government
  • Bark: 2% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • The Dougy Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to So Hum Foundation?

Find your warmest path to So Hum Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on So Hum’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home