Skip to content

· Private foundation

Smith Pete and Sally Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$337k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Environment$1.2MEducation$971kHealth$254kYouth Development$135kScience & Tech$15kRecreation & Sports$11k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $114k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $220k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPSTATE FOREVER$120,000
TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$50,000
CLEMSON UNIV FOUNDATION ENGAGED AGING$50,000
TRI-COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUND INC$25,000
LAND TRUST FOR TENNESSEE INC$25,000
WILD HEARTS EQUINE THERAPEUTIC CENTER IN$23,520
UPSTATE INSTITUTE OF YOUTH PROGRAMS INC$20,000
CHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY INC$10,500
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RELATED DISORDERS ASS$10,000
MOUNTAIN SPROUTS LEARNING$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%STEM FOR TOMORROW: $15k → 8%UPSTATE FOREVER: $120k → 10%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100k → 12%TRICOUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION I: $25k → 15%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $131k → 16%NEW MORNING FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%SOUTH CAROLINA FOOTHILLS HERITAE FAIR: $11k → 17%LAND TRUST FOR TENNESSEE INC: $50k → 14%RHEA COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY: $24k → 14%TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $75k → 15%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $50k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100k → 7%UPSTATE FOREVER: $100k → 10%TRI-COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $111k → 16%SCHOOL DISTRICT OF OCONEE COUNTY: $50k → 17%LAND TRUST FOR TENNESSEE INC: $25k → 14%RHEA COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY: $24k → 14%TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $75k → 15%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $50k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50k → 7%UPSTATE FOREVER: $100k → 10%TRI-COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUND INC: $25k → 15%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $31k → 16%OCONEE COUNTY - SOLID WASTE & RECYCLING: $50k → 17%LAND TRUST FOR TENNESSEE INC: $25k → 14%TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $75k → 15%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50k → 7%UPSTATE FOREVER: $100k → 10%CLEMSON UNIV FOUNDATION ENGAGED AGING: $50k → 16%UPSTATE INSTITUTE OF YOUTH PROGRAMS: $31k → 17%LAND TRUST FOR TENNESSEE INC: $25k → 14%TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $75k → 15%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50k → 7%UPSTATE FOREVER: $75k → 10%UPSTATE INSTITUTE OF YOUTH PROGRAMS: $27k → 17%LAND TRUST FOR TENNESSEE INC: $20k → 14%TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $60k → 15%UPSTATE FOREVER: $75k → 10%WILD HEARTS EQUINE THERAPEUTIC CENTER IN: $24k → 17%TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $60k → 15%UPSTATE INSTITUTE OF YOUTH PROGRAMS: $22k → 17%TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $50k → 15%UPSTATE INSTITUTE OF YOUTH PROGRAMS: $15k → 17%TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $50k → 15%OCONEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $45k → 17%UPSTATE INSTITUTE OF YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $20k → 17%CHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY INC: $11k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 10 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$2.0M
$201k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+143%

Still filing today

80%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UPSTATE FOREVER
    6× · 2019–2025 · $570k · revenue +268%
  • TW
    TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $520k · revenue +45%
  • CU
    CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $273k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • SD
    SCHOOL DISTRICT OF OCONEE COUNTY
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • OC
    OCONEE COUNTY - SOLID WASTE & RECYCLING
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • OM
    OCONEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $45k · revenue +143%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Triangle Land Conservancy Inc

Triangle land conservancy (tlc) strives to create a healthier and more vibrant triangle region by safeguarding clean water, protecting natural habitats, supporting local farms, and connecting people with nature through land protection and…

Environment
2
Lowcountry Land Trust Inc

To protect land and water forever, nurture relationships between people and place, and connect conservation to community.

Environment
3
Harpeth Conservancy

To restore and protect clean water and healthy ecosystems for rivers in tennessee by employing scientific expertise and collaborative relationships to develop, promote, and support broad community stewardship and action.

Environment
4
Nc State Natural Resources Foundation Inc

To promote education and research in the college of natural resources of north carolina state university as well as aid and promote, by financial assistance and otherwise, all types of education, research and extension in the college of…

Education
5
Conservation Trust for North Carolina

Ctnc conserves land in ways that inspire and enable people to build resilient, just communities. we carry out our mission in collaboration with other conservation organizations and the communities we serve. our goal is to lessen the…

Environment
6
Three Rivers Land Trust Inc

Protect and conserve land, natural areas, rural landscapes, family farms and historic places within north carolina's heartland

Environment
7
Atlantic Coast Conservancy Inc

The mission of the atlantic coast conservancy is to provide 21st century solutions and sound scientific applications for conservation of critical natural resources in the face of a changing climate, focusing on the southeasthern united…

Environment
8
Musc Strategic Ventures

To promote and support the educational, medical, scientific, and research purposes of the medical university of south carolina "musc", and university medical associates of the medical university of south carolina "uma", including their…

Health
9
The Carolina Trust
Philanthropy
10
North Carolina Conservation Network

The north carolina conservation network supports, trains, and coordinates diverse groups and directly advocates to achieve equitable and sustainable solutions for our environment.

Environment
11
Tenngreen Land Conservancy

The organization's primary mission is conserving land where people and nature can thrive by creating green corridors linking existing public lands using conservation easments and outright purchase.

Recreation & Sports
12
New River Land Trust

To conserve the rural, natural, and cultural heritage of the new river region, protecting farms, forests, open spaces, and historic places.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clemson University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Upstate Institute of Youth Programs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $520,000 · EducationTENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITYCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $273,450 · EducationCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONTRI-COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · EducationTRI-COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATI…UPSTATE FOREVER: $570,000 · EnvironmentUPSTATE FOREVERTHE LAND TRUST FOR TENNESSEE INC: $165,000 · EnvironmentTHE LAND TRUST FOR TENNESSEE INCCHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY: $71,750 · EnvironmentCHATTOOGA CONSERVANCYTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $350,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYCLEMSON UNIV FOUNDATION ENGAGED AGING: $50,000 · OtherCLEMSON UNIV FOUNDATION E…SCHOOL DISTRICT OF OCONEE COUNTY: $50,000 · OtherSCHOOL DISTRICT OF OCONEE…OCONEE COUNTY - SOLID WASTE & RECYCLING: $50,000 · OtherOCONEE COUNTY - SOLID WAS…RHEA COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY: $48,000 · OtherRHEA COUNTY IMAGINATION L…+5 more: $45,650 · Other+5 moreAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100,000 · HealthOCONEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · HealthWILD HEARTS EQUINE THERAPY CENTER: $23,520 · HealthUPSTATE INSTITUTE OF YOUTH PROGRAMS: $134,665 · Youth DevelopmentNEW MORNING: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Education$868,450Environment$806,750Other$593,650Health$168,520Youth Development$134,665Philanthropy$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUPSTATE FOREVER: $570,000 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetTENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $520,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $350,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $273,450 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LAND TRUST FOR TENNESSEE INC: $165,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetUPSTATE INSTITUTE OF YOUTH PROGRAMS: $134,665 over 7y, 7.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY: $71,750 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetOCONEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetNEW MORNING: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWILD HEARTS EQUINE THERAPY CENTER: $23,520 over 1y, 3.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UPSTATE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LAND TRUST FOR TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds UPSTATE INSTITUTE OF YOUTH PROGRAMS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds OCONEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MORNING ↗
  • Who funds WILD HEARTS EQUINE THERAPY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Smith Pete and Sally Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Smith Pete and Sally Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Smith Pete and Sally’s filings →

    More from the funding graph