Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Private foundation

Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
8
Grants FY2024
11
Organizations funded FY2023
27%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$15,750
Organizations funded a year
8 to 12
FY2018 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
4
Total assets, FY2024
$1.4M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 27% of the organizations Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 21% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving8$81k38%
FY202311$61k27%
FY202212$76k42%
FY20218$63k25%
FY202011$52k45%
FY20199$48k22%
FY20189$51kn/a
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Animals$204kFood & Nutrition$62kReligion$45kEducation$33kInternational$28kEmployment$15kCommunity Improvement$10kHealth$5kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
DC
MS

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Mercy for Animals Inc$50,75050%
Vegan Outreach Inc$50,28661%
The Good Food Institute Inc$46,46360%
Christian Appalachian Project Inc$40,00050%
Fish Welfare Initiative$29,02542%
Step Up$22,5003n/a
Piney Woods School$20,45030%
Childfund International USA$20,00030%
Animal Outlook Inc$15,53340%
Innovate Animal Ag$15,50022%
Show all 25 grantees
All grantees of Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Mercy for Animals Inc$50,75050%
Vegan Outreach Inc$50,28661%
The Good Food Institute Inc$46,46360%
Christian Appalachian Project Inc$40,00050%
Fish Welfare Initiative$29,02542%
Step Up$22,5003n/a
Piney Woods School$20,45030%
Childfund International USA$20,00030%
Animal Outlook Inc$15,53340%
Innovate Animal Ag$15,50022%
Bikes Not Bombs Inc$15,00030%
American Indian College Fund$12,50030%
Hazlehurst in Bloom$10,0001n/a
Medecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc$7,50020%
Encompass Inc$7,00035%
Greener by Default$5,50010%
New Roots Institute$5,34610%
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc$5,00010%
The Humane League$5,00010%
Copiah County Animal Shelter Inc$5,000110%
New Hampshire Catholic Charities$5,00010%
Catholic Charities USA$5,0001n/a
Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc$5,00010%
International Fund for Animal Welfare Inc$3,00010%
Capitol Hill Arts Workshop$1,00010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 4 recipients with no EIN on record ($25k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMercy for Animals Inc: $50,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVegan Outreach Inc: $50,286 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetThe Good Food Institute Inc: $46,463 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetChristian Appalachian Project Inc: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFish Welfare Initiative: $29,025 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetPiney Woods School: $20,450 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChildfund International USA: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Outlook Inc: $15,533 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetInnovate Animal Ag: $15,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetBikes Not Bombs Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Indian College Fund: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMedecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEncompass Inc: $7,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetGreener by Default: $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNew Roots Institute: $5,346 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPeople for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Humane League: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCopiah County Animal Shelter Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Fund for Animal Welfare Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCapitol Hill Arts Workshop: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 22.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Humane America Animal FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Humane America Animal Foundation · Animal Charity Evaluators · The Greenbaum Foundation · The Quinn Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence Inc with peer funders

About Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence Inc

How much does Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence Inc give?
Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence Inc reported 8 grants totaling $81,096 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 12 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.
What does Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2024, its largest causes are Animals (47%), Food & Nutrition (14%), Religion (10%).
Who are Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2024: Mercy for Animals Inc ($51k), Vegan Outreach Inc ($50k), The Good Food Institute Inc ($46k).
Does Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 27% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Humane America Animal Foundation, Animal Charity Evaluators, The Greenbaum Foundation.
Where is Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence Inc based?
Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence Inc is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Smith & Atcheson Fund for Excellence’s filings →

More from the funding graph