· Public charity
Smile Train Inc
Smile train, inc.'s primary purpose is to provide people born with clefts the same opportunities in life as those born without clefts.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $1,788,851 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $52,628,163 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $50,839,312 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $146k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BE TEAM INTERNATIONAL INC | $586,500 |
| LIFEBOX FOUNDATION INC | $542,953 |
| GHAYOUR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION (FBM LAZER ESTETIK PLASTIK CERRAHI KLINIGI SA | $375,550 |
| APROQUEN INC | $65,585 |
| AMERICAN CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL ASSOC | $64,852 |
| SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL DBA SEATTLE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH | $46,701 |
| PLASTIC SURGERY FOUNDATION | $40,360 |
| THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS | $26,750 |
| INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR DENTAL RESEARCH | $17,000 |
| CLEAR GLOBAL INC (TRANSLATORS WITHOUT BORDERS) | $15,600 |
| CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $30M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions, $29M to organizations and $322k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: CLEFT SURGERIES & COMPREHENSIVE CARE · CLEFT TREATMENT TRAINING
Stated purpose: CLEFT SURGERIES & COMPREHENSIVE CARE
Stated purpose: CLEFT SURGERIES & COMPREHENSIVE CARE · CLEFT TREATMENT TRAINING
Stated purpose: CLEFT SURGERIES & COMPREHENSIVE CARE
Stated purpose: CLEFT SURGERIES & COMPREHENSIVE CARE
Stated purpose: CLEFT SURGERIES & COMPREHENSIVE CARE
Stated purpose: CLEFT SURGERIES & COMPREHENSIVE CARE
Stated purpose: CLEFT SURGERIES & COMPREHENSIVE CARE · CLEFT TREATMENT TRAINING
Stated purpose: CLEFT SURGERIES & COMPREHENSIVE CARE
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LFLifebox Foundation Inc5× · 2021–2025 · $4.4M · revenue +45% · 41% of their budget
- BTBE TEAM INTERNATIONAL INC2× · 2024–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +5%
- SCSeattle Children's Foundation4× · 2021–2024 · $302k · revenue +60%
Funded once
- VUVanderbilt University Medical Centergraduatedone grant, 2022 · $2.3M · revenue +35%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONone grant, 2022 · $100k
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAIone grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
The Foundation provides surgical services primarily to patients at Boston Children's Hospital and at satellite locations. The Foundation carries on and promotes basic and applied medical research and education in the field of surgery by…
To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc and the most unlike its peers is Utah Smiles Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Lifebox Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
- Who funds BE TEAM INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds GHAYOUR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL SMILE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLASTIC SURGERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT FACES INC ↗
- Who funds APROQUEN INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CLEFT PALATE - CRANIOFACIAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds New Mexico Medical Foundation ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLEAR GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR DENTAL RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds SPOON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EVERY SMILE HAS A STORY INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH SMILES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL INITIATIVE FOR CHILDRENS SURGERY ↗
- Who funds Worldwide Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRACARE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Teachers College Columbia University ↗
- Who funds CORE INC ↗
- Who funds Carilion Clinic Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Smile Train Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.