Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sla Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$63k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of Sla Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Austin Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’18
2
’19
0
’20
0
’21
0
’22
1
’23
0
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$310kEducation$3kHealth$2kCommunity Improvement$2kYouth Development$1kArts & Culture$240Human Services$141Housing & Shelter$105
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $455
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$390
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$63,000
COUNCIL ON AT-RISK YOUTH (CARY)$390
CARITAS OF AUSTIN$65
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CUREDECHENNE CORONA: $520 → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $600 → 10%CF ENTREPRENEURS COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $1k → 14%MS 150: $290 → 16%MARCH OF DIMES: $500 → 7%CURE DUCHENNE: $500 → 10%MCCALLUM HIGH SCHOOL: $40 → 10%MS 150: $250 → 16%COUNCIL ON AT-RISK YOUTH (CARY): $390 → 10%LEADERSHIP AUSTIN: $500 → 10%AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $120 → 10%AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $120 → 10%CARITAS OF AUSTIN: $65 → 10%LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA RC: $200 → 10%AMPLIFY AUSTIN DAYI LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE: $144 → 10%AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $63k → 10%AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $55k → 10%AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $49k → 10%AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $49k → 10%AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $44k → 10%AUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 10%I LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE: $100 → 10%ANDY RODDICK FOUNDATION: $950 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Area Foundation

Support nonprofit organizations by managing & distributing charitable gifts

Philanthropy
2
Austin Street Center

The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…

—
3
Austin Public Library Friends Foundation

Support and strengthen austin public libraries

Education
4
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
5
Center for Austin Independent Journalism

To equip Austinites to make informed decisions through independent, in-depth reporting, diverse opinions, and civil dialogue. A strong local press is essential for a healthy community and democracy. We work to make Austin a more empowered…

Arts & Culture
6
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
7
Austin Creative Alliance

The mission of Austin Creative Alliance is to advance, connect, and celebrate Austin's arts, culture, and creative communities in order to nourish and strengthen the character, quality of life, and economic prosperity of our region.

Arts & Culture
8
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
9
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
10
Central Houston Inc

See schedule ocentral houston champions a thriving downtown by connecting influential leaders through initiatives that advance the future of business and community for all.

—
11
Austin City Lutherans

Address food and housing insecurity for Austin-area low income families.

Religion
12
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Austin Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cure Duchenne. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $310,000 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2,000 · OtherCF ENTREPRENEURS COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $1,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $600 · OtherMS 150: $540 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $520 · OtherCOUNCIL ON AT-RISK YOUTH (CARY): $390 · OtherLEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA RC: $200 · Other+5 more: $430 · OtherANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC: $950 · Youth DevelopmentLEADERSHIP AUSTIN: $500 · Youth DevelopmentMARCH OF DIMES INC: $500 · HealthCURE DUCHENNE: $500 · HealthAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $240 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$310,100Other$5,680Youth Development$1,450Health$1,000Arts & Culture$240

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $310,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC: $950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURE DUCHENNE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP AUSTIN: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $240 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetI LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $65 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds CURE DUCHENNE ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds I LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Topfer Family FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Topfer Family Foundation · Better Business Bureau · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sla Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sla Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sla’s filings →

    More from the funding graph