Skip to content

· Private foundation

SK2 Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$195k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Community Improvement$243kEnvironment$203kInternational$122kFood & Nutrition$102kRecreation & Sports$33kHealth$32kEducation$25kAnimals$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Just Economy Institute$50,000
Posibility Labs$15,000
Idaho Conservation League$15,000
Black Farmer Fund$15,000
Advocates for the West$15,000
Andean Alliance for Sustainable Dev$15,000
Peaceful Bamboo Family$10,000
De La Gente$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
American Rivers$5,000
Realize Impact - Beneficial Returns$5,000
Nevada Nordic$5,000
Coop Cincy$5,000
Advocates for the West$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 78% of grant dollars ($638k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 22% that went abroad ($180k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Untours Foundation: $13k → 10%Untours Foundation: $1k → 10%Possibility Labs: $50k → 10%Posibility Labs: $15k → 10%Possibility Labs: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MD
AR
DC

Beyond the US: 22% of all-years giving ($180k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Vietnam$65k · 6 grants
Cambodia$55k · 6 grants
Guatemala$40k · 4 grants
Peru$15k · 1 grant
Israel$5k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of SK2 Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 19% of the giving stays in ID; by stated purpose, 16%.

SK2 Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 29% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$402k · 15 repeat orgs$417k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +107% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
42

Total granted

$402k
$318k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+107%
+29%

Still filing today

67%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • POSSIBILITY LABS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $73k · revenue +116%
  • IC
    IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $48k · revenue +7%
  • AF
    ADVOCATES FOR THE WEST INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $44k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • SR
    Swift River Farm
    one grant, 2021 · $27k
  • RF
    Reciprocity Fund recoverable grant
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • RF
    Reciprocity Fund
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
2
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment
3
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
4
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
5
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
6
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
7
Planet Women

To partner with women to care for the forest, waters, and communities essential to mitigating climate change while preparing women to lead; and to help environmental conservation oganizations to become more diverse and welcoming.

International
8
A Greener World

A Greener World empowers sustainable solutions in agriculture, promoting and supporting real-life farming models to the public and offering farmers and ranchers practical guidance, resources and support on achieving truly sustainable…

Food & Nutrition
9
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
10
International Rivers Network

International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.

Environment
11
Natura Bolivia Foundation

The Natura Bolivia Foundation is dedicated to implementing, and evaluating the impact of conservation and development programs, with a focus on watershed conservation, protected areas, and incentive based conservation in Bolivia. We work…

International
12
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thousand Currents; the most unlike its peers is Idaho Rivers United. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Just Economy Institute: $50,000 · OtherJust Economy InstituteIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $47,800 · OtherIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INCSwift River Farm: $26,580 · OtherSwift River FarmPeaceful Bamboo Family: $25,000 · OtherWomen's Resource Center Cambodia: $25,000 · OtherReciprocity Fund recoverable grant: $25,000 · OtherReciprocity Fund: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherBeneficial Returns: $17,159 · Other+38 more: $222,465 · Other+38 moreSTREET BUSINESS SCHOOL: $60,000 · EducationSTREET BUSIN…AMIGOS DE SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationAMIGOS DE SA…NURTURING MINDS INC: $5,000 · EducationNURTURING MI…POSSIBILITY LABS: $72,500 · Human ServicesPOSSIBILITY…UNTOURS FOUNDATION: $14,000 · Human ServicesUNTOURS FOU…ADVOCATES FOR THE WEST INC: $43,500 · EnvironmentADVOCATES F…AMERICAN RIVERS INC: $25,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN RI…WILDERNESS INQUIRY INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentWILDERNESS …NORTHWEST CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO PESTICIDES: $5,000 · EnvironmentNORTHWEST C…SAWTOOTH BOTANICAL GARDEN: $3,030 · Environment+3 more: $2,817 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN CAPITAL PROJECT: $20,000 · Community ImprovementBLACK FARMER FUND INC: $20,000 · Community ImprovementNevada Nordic: $22,500 · Recreation & SportsANDEAN ALLIANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: $10,000 · HealthDRUG POLICY ALLIANCE: $1,000 · Health
Other$484,004Education$90,000Human Services$86,500Environment$84,347Community Improvement$40,000Recreation & Sports$22,500Health$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPOSSIBILITY LABS: $72,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTREET BUSINESS SCHOOL: $60,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $47,800 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetADVOCATES FOR THE WEST INC: $43,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMIGOS DE SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetNevada Nordic: $22,500 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetBLACK FARMER FUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANDEAN ALLIANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE AFRIWOMEN NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetAKIPTAN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNURTURING MINDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILDERNESS INQUIRY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO PESTICIDES: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSAWTOOTH BOTANICAL GARDEN: $3,030 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIDAHO RIVERS UNITED: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRUG POLICY ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEREGRINE FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREES WATER AND PEOPLE: $208 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOLAR ENERGY SOCIETY INC: $109 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds POSSIBILITY LABS ↗
  • Who funds STREET BUSINESS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES FOR THE WEST INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMIGOS DE SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Nevada Nordic ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CAPITAL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds BLACK FARMER FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNTOURS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANDEAN ALLIANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds THE AFRIWOMEN NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AKIPTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NURTURING MINDS INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDERNESS INQUIRY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arthur B Schultz FoundationWY17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arthur B Schultz Foundation · Christensen Family Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Clif Family Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Patagoniaorg · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization SK2 Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from SK2 Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Northwest Center for Alternatives to Pesticides: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to SK2 Fund?

Find your warmest path to SK2 Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on SK2’s filings →

More from the funding graph