Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sje Rhombus Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Youth Development$120kPhilanthropy$90kEducation$71kArts & Culture$59kHuman Services$50kHealth$40kCommunity Improvement$15kScience & Tech$6k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
$2,959
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ashland County Community Foundation$30,000
DLCCC Inc$25,000
Individual grant recipient$11,000
Individual grant recipient$2,959
Detroit Lakes Public Education$1,400
West Central Initiative$500
LPA Dollar for Scholars$500
Detroit Lakes Dollars for Scholars$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DLCCC Inc: $25k → 10%DLCCC Inc: $15k → 10%DLCCC Inc: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$242k · 9 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$242k
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

22%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of Detroit Lake
    2× · 2021–2022 · $80k
  • DI
    DLCCC INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +14%
  • EH
    Essentia Health St Mary's Foundatio
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k

Funded once

  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • BC
    Becker County Museum
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • P4
    PROJECT 412
    one grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Boys and Girls Club of Detroit Lake: $80,000 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of Detroit LakeBoys and Girls Club: $40,000 · OtherBoys and Girls ClubBecker County Museum: $30,000 · OtherBecker County MuseumEssentia Health St Mary's Foundatio: $30,000 · OtherEssentia Health St Mary's FoundatioBECKER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $28,500 · OtherBECKER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $28,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe OH FDN of IND Colleges: $18,500 · OtherThe OH FDN of IND CollegesEssentia Health St Marys Foundation: $10,000 · Other+10 more: $29,968 · Other+10 moreASHLAND COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $90,000 · PhilanthropyASHLAND COUNTY COMMUNIT…+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyDLCCC INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesDLCCC INCPROJECT 412: $12,500 · Community Improvement
Other$295,468Philanthropy$92,000Human Services$50,000Community Improvement$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASHLAND COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDLCCC INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetBECKER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $28,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetPROJECT 412: $12,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASHLAND COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DLCCC INC ↗
  • Who funds BECKER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT 412 ↗
  • Who funds WEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carl and Aune Lind Family FoundationMN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carl and Aune Lind Family Foundation · Mark and Cindy Fritz Family Foundation · St Mary's Regional Health Center · Sanford Group Return · West Central Initiative · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sje Rhombus Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sje Rhombus Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sje Rhombus Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sje Rhombus Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sje Rhombus’ filings →

    More from the funding graph