Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sisters of Reparation Char Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$750k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$1.1MReligion$794kHuman Services$425kEducation$306kCivil Rights$185kRecreation & Sports$150kFood & Nutrition$122kHousing & Shelter$121kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $280k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $220k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD SAMARITAN FDN FOR BETTER$250,000
WEUPLIFT INC$150,000
ADVOCATING FOR CHANGE$70,000
PARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION$40,000
CHURCH OF ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST$40,000
OUR LADY OF SHKODRA$40,000
SISTERS OF LIFE$30,000
Catholic Charities Community Services of$30,000
MOMMAS INC$20,000
HELPING HANDS INTERFAITH COALITION$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
RYAN PATRICK O'SHEA FOUNDATION$20,000
Birthright of Nassau & Suffolk Inc$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MOMMAS INC: $20k → 6%WNY WOMENS FOUNDATION: $20k → 13%GOSHEN ECUMENICAL PANTRY INC: $60k → 14%RYAN PATRICK O'SHEA FOUNDATION: $50k → 6%RYAN PATRICK O'SHEA FOUNDATION: $30k → 6%RYAN PATRICK O'SHEA FOUNDATION: $20k → 6%RYAN PATRICK O'SHEA FOUNDATION: $20k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
CT
VA
AZ
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 22 repeat orgs$542k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
14

Total granted

$3.0M
$472k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+47%

Still filing today

41%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsInternationalPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION FOR BETTER HEALTH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $825k · revenue +34%
  • RP
    RYAN PATRICK O'SHEA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $120k · revenue +55% · 47% of their budget
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $80k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES
    one grant, 2024 · $70k
  • GE
    GOSHEN ECUMENICAL PANTRY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $60k · revenue -41% · 60% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Give Life Ny
Health
2
St Joseph's Medical Pc

We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.

Health
3
Ny New Hope Pregnancy Resource Center
—
4
Saint Peters Healthcare System Inc

Saint peter's healthcare system, inc. is a not for-profit holding company based in new brunswick, new jersey. saint peter's healthcare system, inc. is the sole corporate member of a number of not for-profit entities and the sole…

—
5
Saint Peter's University Hospital

Keeping faith with the teachings of the roman catholic church and guided by the bishop of metuchen, saint peter's university hospital is committed to humble service to humanity, especially the poor, through competence and good stewardship…

Health
6
St Joseph's Physician Health Pc

We, st. joseph's physician health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

Health
7
Bon Secours New York Health System Inc

Bon secours new york health system, inc. (bsnyhs) is the parent and central organization of an established integrated healthcare delivery system.

—
8
Healthcare Choices Ny Inc

Healthcare choices ny, inc., a federally qualified health center licensed by the state of new york is an outpatient health center providing community based health services primarily to persons who may have a mental health diagnosis or be…

Health
9
Planned Parenthood of Central and Western New York Inc

Planned parenthood of the central and western new york, inc (ppcwny) is a nonprofit organization that provides reproductive health care to men and women in the central and western ny area. ppcwny is licensed by new york state article 28 of…

Health
10
Long Island Birthright Inc

To provide alternatives to abortion for pregnant women.

—
11
Planned Parenthood of Nassau County Inc

The mission of planned parenthood of nassau county, inc. (ppnc) was to compassionately and respectfully empower individuals to make independent, informed decisions about their sexual and reproductive lives by providing access to…

—
12
Brooklyn Perinatal Network Inc

The organizations key approach and strategy is collective work for community members who are at risks of poor maternal health outcomes and increase their access to the health promotion resources they need and that are available.…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Samaritan Foundation for Better Health; the most unlike its peers is Made Transitional Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HELPING HANDS INTERFAITH COALITION: $160,000 · OtherHELPING HANDS INTERFAITH COALITIONALBANIAN AND AMERICAN OPEN HAND: $150,000 · OtherALBANIAN AND AMERICAN OPEN HANDCHURCH OF ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST: $140,000 · OtherCHURCH OF ST JOHN THE EVANGELISTOUR LADY OF SHKODRA: $136,500 · OtherOUR LADY OF SHKODRAST JUDE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH CORPORATION: $120,000 · OtherST JUDE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH CORPORATIONSISTERS OF LIFE: $100,000 · OtherSISTERS OF LIFEIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE: $95,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THEADVOCATING FOR CHANGE: $95,000 · OtherADVOCATING FOR CHANGEIndividual grant recipient: $92,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $70,000 · OtherLIFEWAY NETWORK INC: $61,000 · Other+13 more: $374,000 · Other+13 moreGOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION FOR BETTER HEALTH: $825,000 · HealthGOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION FOR BETTER…WEUPLIFT INC: $190,000 · HealthWEUPLIFT INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $80,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL…+1 more: $20,000 · HealthPARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS: $306,000 · PhilanthropyPARTNERSH…RYAN PATRICK O'SHEA FOUNDATION: $120,000 · Human ServicesGOSHEN ECUMENICAL PANTRY INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesWNY WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesMommas Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesBIRTHRIGHT OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $61,000 · Civil RightsHELP FROM PEOPLE TO PEOPLE INC: $29,000 · Civil RightsBIRTHRIGHT OF NASSAU & SUFFOLK INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE: $40,000 · InternationalMADE Transitional Services: $25,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,693,500Health$1,115,000Philanthropy$306,000Human Services$220,000Civil Rights$110,000International$40,000Crime & Legal$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION FOR BETTER HEALTH: $825,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS: $306,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetWEUPLIFT INC: $190,000 over 2y, 56% of budgetRYAN PATRICK O'SHEA FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 4y, 47% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEWAY NETWORK INC: $61,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $61,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetGOSHEN ECUMENICAL PANTRY INC: $60,000 over 1y, 60% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHELP FROM PEOPLE TO PEOPLE INC: $29,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S CHURCH FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetWNY WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT OF NASSAU & SUFFOLK INC: $20,000 over 1y, 31% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION FOR BETTER HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds WEUPLIFT INC ↗
  • Who funds RYAN PATRICK O'SHEA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFEWAY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds GOSHEN ECUMENICAL PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds HELP FROM PEOPLE TO PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds MADE Transitional Services ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN'S CHURCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WNY WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT OF NASSAU & SUFFOLK INC ↗
  • Who funds Mommas Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sisters of Reparation Char Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sisters of Reparation Char Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sisters of Reparation Char Tr?

Find your warmest path to Sisters of Reparation Char Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sisters of Reparation Char Tr’s filings →

More from the funding graph