· Private foundation
Sippy Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CLAY STUDIO OF MISSOULA | $12,500 |
| MONTANA POOL SERVICE FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| CHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION UNITED M | $10,000 |
| MISSOULA ART MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| FILM INDEPENDENT INC | $10,000 |
| WILD SALMON CENTER | $5,000 |
| CLIMATE SMART MISSOULA | $5,000 |
| BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| MONTANA NATURAL HISTORY CENTER INC | $1,000 |
| THOMPSON RIVER ANIMAL CARE SHELTER | $1,000 |
| AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 9% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 5% of Sippy Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MAMISSOULA ART MUSEUM6× · 2020–2025 · $395k · revenue +197% · 27% of their budget
- CSCLAY STUDIO OF MISSOULA6× · 2020–2025 · $51k · revenue +298%
- FOFRIENDS OF MISSOULA PARKS INC6× · 2017–2023 · $30k · revenue +966%
Funded once
- YHYOUTH HOMESone grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -6%
- MTMUSIC THEATRE FOR YOUNG PEOPLEone grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue -51%
- NCNORTH-MISSOULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +786%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enhance community vitality by inspiring community giving and strengthening nonprofits
The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.
To create and sustain an optimal business climate, business prosperity and a strong montana economy through advocacy, education and collaboration, working to provide an empowered and educated workforce, reduce business growth obstacles,…
The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.
To collectively serve as a catalyst for engagement and bonding of people to our wildlife and public lands in montana through a sense of place, education, access, research and stewardship.
To heighten the public's awareness of conservation districts and their activities as well as to promote soil and water conservation.
Acquire and manage land and conservation easements through purchase and donation to ensure long term conservation of clean water, fish and wildlife habitat, and other community values.
An association providing community leadership and business advocacy sustaining economic vitality.
To inspire an appreciation and understanding of insects and their relatives.
The montana state parks foundation raises private support to enhance the visitors experience and build advocates for montanas state parks and recreation heritage.
Uniting and mobilizing communities to keep montana wild.
The corporation's purposes shall include, but not be limited to conducting or supporting programs to promote and advocate for land and water conservation issues and to educate the public regarding the conservation related issues addressed…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wild Salmon Center and the most unlike its peers is Montana Pool Service Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MISSOULA ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds CLAY STUDIO OF MISSOULA ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MISSOULA PARKS INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOULA DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONTANA POOL SERVICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FILM INDEPENDENT ↗
- Who funds WILD SALMON CENTER ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE SMART MISSOULA INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH HOMES ↗
- Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC ↗
- Who funds MUSIC THEATRE FOR YOUNG PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds NORTH-MISSOULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Thompson River Animal Care Shelter ↗
- Who funds MONTANA NATURAL HISTORY CENTER ↗
- Who funds AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Max and Betty Swanson Foundation · The Llewellyn Foundation · The High Stakes Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Appleseed Foundation · James G and Marcia H Valeo Charitable Fd · The Bill & Rosemary Gallagher Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sippy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wild Salmon Center — 49% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sippy Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Sippy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.