· Private foundation
Sino American Amity Fund Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $84k
- $250k+1 grant · $520k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FU JEN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $520,000 |
| MOUNT ANGEL COLLEGE AND SEMINARY | $30,147 |
| CENC | $15,000 |
| DEPAUL UNIVERSITY | $14,049 |
| CONGREGATION OF THE MISSION | $13,500 |
| ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY | $11,430 |
| FORDHAM UNIVERSITY | $6,000 |
| AVILA UNIVERSITY | $6,000 |
| ADLER UNIVERSITY | $6,000 |
| MING YUAN CHINESE SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| NEW YORK CHINESE SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| CHINESE PEOPLE'S FOUNDATION FOR WORLD | $3,500 |
| UA3 INC | $3,500 |
| NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL | $3,000 |
| NEW YORK CITY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FUFU-JEN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +63%
- FUFordham University4× · 2019–2024 · $33k · revenue +31%
- CMCHINATOWN MANPOWER PROJECT INC2× · 2022–2023 · $30k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- PIPEARL INSTITUTEone grant, 2017 · $30k
- SHSETON HALL UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $9k · revenue +47%
- HHHAMILON-MADISON HOUSE BEHAVIORAL SERVICESone grant, 2020 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To offer postsecondary education in acupuncture and chinese herbal medicine
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…
Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…
Providing professional training of Chinese Medicine (TCM), including acupuncture, Chinese herbology, acupressure, Qigong and so on, granting the students Masters degree. Its a three to four years teaching program.
Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…
Founded by the sisters of charity of new york, the university of mount saint vincent is an academically excellent, authentically inclusive, catholic and ecumenical liberal arts university. (cont. in sch.o)
Molloy university, an independent catholic university, rooted in the dominican tradition of study, spirituality, service, and community, is committed to academic excellence with respect for each person. through transformative education,…
Canisius university is a private, independent roman catholic university, governed by an independent self perpetuating board of trustees under a charter granted by the board of trustees of the university of the state of new york.…
Siena university is a learning community advancing the ideals of a liberal arts education, rooted in its identity as a franciscan and catholic institution. as a learning community, siena is committed to a student-centered education…
Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Juilliard School and the most unlike its peers is Meals for Unity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 61 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FU-JEN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Fordham University ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN MANPOWER PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CHINESE AMERICAN CULTURAL & ART ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CHINESE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Adler University ↗
- Who funds AVILA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SETON HALL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MEALS FOR UNITY INC ↗
- Who funds HOLY APOSTLES COLLEGE AND SEMINARY INC ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
- Who funds SNUG HARBOR CULTURAL CENTER AND BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC ↗
- Who funds CHINESE CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICA HOTEL OWNERS CHARITABLE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lam Family Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sino American Amity Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Seton Hall University — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.