Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Simplistic Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$100kHuman Services$82kPublic Safety & Disaster$60kReligion$49kInternational$24kEducation$20kAnimals$17kEnvironment$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$743k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC$10,000
RIDE TO READ$5,000
K Harris$5,000
PITTY PARTY$5,000
ALPORT SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC$5,000
HINDS HOSPICE$5,000
WOODLAKE LIONS FOUNDATION$2,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$2,000
WE SPARK INC$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $5k → 17%HINDS HOSPICE: $5k → 19%ASSISTANCE SERVICE DOG EDUCATIONAL CENTER INC: $10k → 18%ASSISTANCE SERVICE DOG EDUCATIONAL CENTER INC: $2k → 18%WE SPARK INC: $2k → 14%WE SPARK INC: $2k → 14%WE SPARK INC: $2k → 14%WE SPARK INC: $2k → 14%WE SPARK INC: $1k → 14%WE SPARK INC: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$184k · 11 repeat orgs$203k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
31

Total granted

$184k
$186k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+22%

Still filing today

45%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionEnvironmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $65k · revenue +8%
  • NF
    NATIONAL FALLEN FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • WI
    WESPARK INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • CU
    CASD USA
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • MULTIPLIERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +264%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mission Flight

Our mission is to fly medical patients to critically needed appointments within California as well as to fly volunteer teams into remote, impoverished areas of Mexico. Our passion is to connect people who are isolated and in poverty with…

International
2
Southern California Wheelchair Veterans Association

To aid and assist veterans of the armed forces in southern california who are disabled, paralyzed, confined in wheelchairs, terminally ill, hospitalized, or confined in nursing homes to a more qualified way of life through recreation,…

Human Services
3
Wings of Hope

To save and change lives through the power of aviation. throughout its 60-year history, wings of hope has provided lifesaving care and access to resources in more than 50 countries. the organization was nominated twice for the nobel peace…

International
4
Warfighter Scuba

To provide scuba instruction for veterans with ptsd. the weightlessness of scuba provides a peaceful respite from the pressures and trauma of military service. scuba for amputees provides a freedom of movement not experienced for years…

Public Benefit
5
Veterans Airlift Command

Organization provides cost free transportation for wounded veterans and their families from their homes to the various medical facilities around the country, primarily using aircraft.

Human Services
6
Healing Paws for Warriors Inc

Healing paws for warriors is a local veteran found / veteran led 501(c)(3) that provides rescue to trained service dogs to veterans faced with post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd), traumatic brain injury (tbi) and/or military sexual…

Human Services
7
Luke's Wings

The organization dedicated to the support of service members who have been wounded in battle. provides families with the means to visit during service member hospitalization and rehabilitation.

Health
8
Helicopters for Heroes
Human Services
9
Wings for Vets Inc

Vets Helping Vets was founded by a group of Vietnam veterans who sole purpose is to provide our convalescing veterans with free air transportation either Private or Commercial for their convenience in obtaining assisting with or returning…

Human Services
10
Paws for Purple Hearts

Paws for Purple Hearts improves the lives of America's Warriors facing mobility challenges and trauma-related conditions such as PTSD and TBI by providing the highest quality assistance dogs and canine-assisted therapeutic programs; and by…

Public Benefit
11
Warrior Wellness Program Inc

Warrior Wellness Program, Inc. provides alternative therapies, services and community engagement to combat veterans, active duty military and their spouses. Services are primarily delivered through the five-day Accelerated Wellness Program…

Human Services
12
Companions for Heroes

To champion public awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and challenges confronting our countrys heroes and rally support for shelter animal adoption by connecting heroes and companions.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helphopelive Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionHospice Care ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceVeteran Support ServicesCommunity Arts OrganizationsFallen First Responder Supp…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%8%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%33%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr11%29%35–55yr13%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%8%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr11%40%35–55yr13%0%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,951

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH — $39,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC — $20,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INCCASD USA — $20,000 · OtherCASD USAN Welch — $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL FALLEN FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherK Harris — $10,000 · OtherVICTORY OUTREACH PORTERVILLE — $10,000 · Other+26 more — $115,500 · Other+26 moreANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC — $65,000 · HealthANGEL FLIGHT WEST INCHELPHOPELIVE INC — $10,000 · HealthHELPHOPELIVE INCALPORT SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · HealthALPORT SYNDROME FOUNDATI…JONAH & TRAVIS DRUG AWARENESS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthJONAH & TRAVIS DRUG AWAR…ASSISTANCE SERVICE DOG EDUCATIONAL CENTER INC — $11,500 · Human ServicesASSISTANC…WESPARK INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesWESPARK I…Hinds Hospice — $5,000 · Human ServicesHinds Hos…ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN — $5,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATI…RIDE TO READ — $15,000 · EducationMULTIPLIER — $10,000 · EnvironmentBorrego Art Institute — $5,000 · Arts & CultureCAMARILLO WINGS ASSOCIATION — $2,000 · Arts & CultureSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $3,500 · Religion
Other$234,500Health$85,000Human Services$31,500Education$15,000Environment$10,000Arts & Culture$7,000Religion$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC — $65,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetASSISTANCE SERVICE DOG EDUCATIONAL CENTER INC — $11,500 over 2y, 22% of budgetNATIONAL FALLEN FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWESPARK INC — $10,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBorrego Art Institute — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATTICUS CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA COMBAT VETERANS HOPE — $3,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetWounded Soldiers and Families Relief Fund Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCAMARILLO WINGS ASSOCIATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVETS WITH WINGS — $2,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFoodlink for Tulare County Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC
  • Who funds RIDE TO READ
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE SERVICE DOG EDUCATIONAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds MULTIPLIER
  • Who funds NATIONAL FALLEN FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WESPARK INC
  • Who funds HELPHOPELIVE INC
  • Who funds Hinds Hospice
  • Who funds ALPORT SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JONAH & TRAVIS DRUG AWARENESS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Borrego Art Institute
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN
  • Who funds THE CATTICUS CORPORATION
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Simplistic Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 24%
  • National Fallen Firefighters Foundation24% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph