Skip to content

· Private foundation

Silver Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$162k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$573kPhilanthropy$516kArts & Culture$436kHousing & Shelter$347kHuman Services$254kHealth$234kInternational$215kEducation$168kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $99k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $214k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $738k
$7,854
Median grant
9
States reached
$8.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$162,000
BOCA RATON SYNAGOGUE$121,950
FREDERICKSBURG EDUCATION FOUNDATION$100,000
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$100,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY$100,000
Individual grant recipient$54,075
LOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE$50,000
JEWISH ADOPTION & FOSTER CARE OPTIONS$50,000
DELRAY JEWISH LIFE CENTER$36,000
CHAI LIFELINE$36,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
SAM ELIMU CHARITY$20,000
CHABAD OF WEST DELRAY$18,711
UT CHABAD HOUSE$18,000
FAMILY LIFE CENTER$16,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $493k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH ADOPTION & FOSTER CARE OPTIONS: $50k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION & FOSTER CARE OPTIONS: $50k → 13%LOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE: $155k → 15%JEWISH ADOPTION & FOSTER CARE OPTIONS: $50k → 13%LOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE: $50k → 15%HANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC: $5k → 11%JEWISH ADOPTION & FOSTER CARE OPTIONS: $50k → 13%LOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE: $50k → 15%LOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE: $33k → 15%EMPOWERHOUSE: $400 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NY
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
VA
MD
DE
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 33 repeat orgs$420k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
27

Total granted

$2.2M
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+36%

Still filing today

42%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $272k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $347k · revenue +55%
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $144k · revenue +13%
  • HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $98k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • SE
    STAFFORD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCOR PORATEDgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +39%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +16%
  • BC
    BOCA CHESED HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
2
Hand in Hand American Friends of the Center for Jewish-Arab Education in Isra

To promote partnership and coexistence among jewish and arab citizens of israel by providing support for integrated schools and providing funding for and assisting in program development in connection with israeli nonprofits with similar…

International
3
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
4
The Haron Dahan Fund for Bar-Ilan University in Israel

The fund's primary exempt mission is to solicit grants and contributions to support the educational mission of the bar-ilan university's azrieli faculty of medicine in the galilee.

Education
5
Foundation Stone Institute Inc

To promote a positive relationship between catholics and israelis.

—
6
Friends of Elnet

The mission of friends of elnet is to educate leaders and citizens from the united states and europe about israel, promote an exchange of ideas between such leaders and citizens and israelis, and increase knowledge about israel and thereby…

International
7
Friends of Israeli Flying Aid Inc

Friends of israeli flying aid, inc. raises funds to provide funding to a charitable organization in israel, israeli flying aid, for its charitable mission of supplying humanitarian aid and medical assistance in war torn areas of the world.

Human Services
8
American Friends of Kohelet Policy Forum

The principal and primary intent of the organization is to support kohelet policy forum (the "forum"), a jerusalem-based non-profit policy center founded in 2012, comprised of leading academics and researchers.

—
9
American Society for Technion Israel Institute of Technology Inc

The american technion society supports the technion's critical research and (continued on sch o)

International
10
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
11
American Friends of Beit Issie Shapiro Inc

The american friends of beit issie shapiro (afobis) is a national not for profit fundraising organization with regional offices in new york city, north miami beach, fl and los angeles, ca. afobis is dedicated to supporting beit issie…

Human Services
12
Gainesville Jewish Student Foundation Inc

The gainesville jewish student foundation, inc. (known as schilit hillel at uf) mission: schilit hillel at uf enriches the lives of jewish students, inspiring them to make an enduring commitment to jewish life, learning, and israel

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Links Foundation Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Fredericksburg City Public Schools. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
20/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $199,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOCA RATON SYNAGOGUE INC: $136,950 · OtherBOCA RATON SYNAGOGUE INCUT CHABAD HOUSE: $108,000 · OtherUT CHABAD HOUSECHABAD STUDENT ASSOCIATION: $79,000 · OtherCHABAD STUDENT ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $54,075 · OtherTHE FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $47,500 · OtherESSEX COUNTY MUSEUM: $43,500 · OtherHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $97,628 · OtherHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE+55 more: $455,948 · Other+55 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $504,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION …LOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE: $288,056 · Human ServicesLOISANN'S HOPE HO…Jewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc: $200,000 · Human ServicesJewish Adoption a…+2 more: $5,400 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $347,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UN…LANGLEY FLIGHT FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureFREDERICKSBURG CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $100,000 · EducationSAM ELIMU CHARITY: $40,000 · EducationFREDERICKSBURG CHRISTIAN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INC: $33,343 · EducationSTAFFORD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCOR PORATED: $30,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationCHAI LIFELINE INC: $144,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25,000 · HealthSHEPHERD CENTER INC: $10,000 · Health+5 more: $9,500 · HealthAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · International
Other$1,221,601Philanthropy$504,000Human Services$493,456Arts & Culture$362,250Education$208,343Health$188,500International$150,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $504,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $347,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE: $288,056 over 4y, 10% of budgetJewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc: $200,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $144,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $97,628 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAM ELIMU CHARITY: $40,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetMAIN STREET CONNECT INC: $39,400 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG CHRISTIAN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INC: $33,343 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTAFFORD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCOR PORATED: $30,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetHelping Israel Fund: $25,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANGLEY FLIGHT FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetRAPPAHANNOCK UNITED WAY INC: $11,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL SCHOLASTIC ATHLETICS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHILARITY FOR CHARITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKATZ YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANDLES: $5,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFLORIDA BREAST CANCER COALITION RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LINKS FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDECESARISPROUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG RESCUE SQUAD INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEMPOWERHOUSE: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds LOISANN'S HOPE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds FREDERICKSBURG CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds SAM ELIMU CHARITY ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET CONNECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FREDERICKSBURG CHRISTIAN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds STAFFORD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCOR PORATED ↗
  • Who funds Helping Israel Fund ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds LANGLEY FLIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAPPAHANNOCK UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Enlighten Church Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Rappahannock River Region IncVA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Rappahannock River Region Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation of South Palm Beach County Inc · United Jewish Community of Broward County Inc · Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Silver Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Silver Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    8get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Silver’s filings →

    More from the funding graph