Skip to content

· Private foundation

Siegfried and Marjorie Claussner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$309kEducation$62kHealth$41kFood & Nutrition$40kCrime & Legal$20kInternational$17kHousing & Shelter$10kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k35 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
$1,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$18,000
TRINITY ROSELLE FOUNDATION$10,000
TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL$10,000
OUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH PRESCHOO$3,000
TRINITYHOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,500
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,500
MT CALVARY LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,000
PHIL'S FRIENDS$2,000
OUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH PRESCHOO$2,000
ST EDWARDS CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SC$1,500
HOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH FDT$1,500
ST MARYS CONFERENCE OF THE SOCIETY$1,500
ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
HOPE GROWS INTERNATIONAL$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER: $1k → 8%PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER: $1k → 8%PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER: $1k → 8%PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER: $1k → 8%PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER: $1k → 8%PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER: $1k → 8%PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER: $1k → 8%PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER: $1k → 8%PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER: $1k → 8%ASSOC FOR INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT: $500 → 8%ASSOC FOR INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Siegfried and Marjorie Claussner Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Siegfried and Marjorie Claussner Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$574k · 44 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
22

Total granted

$574k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+6%

Still filing today

34%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    TRINITY ROSELLE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +102%
  • PF
    PHIL'S FRIENDS NFP
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +134%
  • MH
    Moving Hope Foundation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +564%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • LC
    LUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • PL
    PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
2
The Lutheran Home Association Foundation

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
3
Lutheran Homes of Michigan Foundation

Motivated by christ's love, we engage people as they experience and embrace their god-given potential.

Housing & Shelter
4
Martin Luther Home Corporation

To provide healthcare and other related services for aging persons regardless of the ability of residents to pay for these services.

—
5
The Lutheran Home Association

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
6
Mercy Medical Center Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities

—
7
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
8
Lutheran Services Florida Inc

Lutheran services florida brings god's healing, hope, and help to people in need in the name of jesus christ.

Human Services
9
Lutheran Life Villages Home Healthcare Inc

As an expression of christ's love, we serve individuals and their caregivers with compassion and respect for independence, wellness, and spiritual life.

—
10
Good Shepherd Hospice Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
11
Lutheran Homes Foundation

It is the mission of the corporation to promote the creation and maintenance of services and institutions for people with care needs. this mission is founded on the belief that prudent use of resources for compassionate services is a…

Human Services
12
Luther Home of Mercy

Luther home of mercy (lhm) is a ministry enriching lives and individual abilities, serving people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Caitlin Duffy Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $95,860 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCHTRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $45,880 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOLHOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $27,000 · OtherHOPE LUTHERAN CHURCHTRINITYHOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $25,500 · OtherTRINITYHOPE LUTHERAN CHURCHGRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $23,500 · OtherOUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH: $18,500 · OtherMT CALVARY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $17,000 · Other+47 more: $198,856 · Other+47 moreTRINITY ROSELLE FOUNDATION: $43,000 · ReligionTRINITY ROS…HOPE GROWS INTERNATIONAL INC: $11,000 · ReligionHOPE GROWS …LUTHERAN BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $9,000 · ReligionLUTHERAN BI…PHIL'S FRIENDS NFP: $21,000 · HealthALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $9,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $12,000 · InternationalLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $6,000 · InternationalTRINITY HOPE INC: $1,000 · International+1 more: $500 · InternationalAMIGOS EN CRISTO INC: $19,000 · Community ImprovementMoving Hope Foundation: $9,500 · PhilanthropyCaitlin Duffy Memorial Foundation: $1,500 · PhilanthropyPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE: $9,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION FOR INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$452,096Religion$63,000Health$36,000International$19,500Community Improvement$19,000Philanthropy$11,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRINITY ROSELLE FOUNDATION: $43,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetPHIL'S FRIENDS NFP: $21,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetAMIGOS EN CRISTO INC: $19,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $12,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE GROWS INTERNATIONAL INC: $11,000 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetMoving Hope Foundation: $9,500 over 8y, 11% of budgetALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIFE CENTER: $9,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetLUTHERAN BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $1,952 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCaitlin Duffy Memorial Foundation: $1,500 over 2y, 92% of budgetRAY GRAHAM ASSOCIATION FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILE BLUFF MEDICAL CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY HOPE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN LIFE COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRINITY ROSELLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHIL'S FRIENDS NFP ↗
  • Who funds AMIGOS EN CRISTO INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE GROWS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Moving Hope Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE LIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thrivent Financial for LutheransMN12.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Siegfried and Marjorie Claussner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Siegfried and Marjorie Claussner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Siegfried and Marjorie Claussner’s filings →

More from the funding graph