· Private foundation
Siddiqui Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Darultarbiyah Dallas | $9,000 |
| ICNA Relief USA | $8,147 |
| The Health and Hope Charity | $8,037 |
| Zafar and Atia Inc | $6,000 |
| BaitulMaal | $2,872 |
| Indian Muslim Relief and Charities USA | $1,900 |
| Valley Ranch Islamic Center | $1,733 |
| Helping Blind People Inc | $1,361 |
| Pkstn Chldrns Hrt Fndtn Nrth Amrca | $1,000 |
| Childlife Foundation | $1,000 |
| Life For Relief and Development | $895 |
| Las Colinas Islamic Center | $800 |
| The Citizens Foundation | $773 |
| Basmah | $500 |
| Islamic School of Irving | $500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 12% of Siddiqui Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- TZTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA4× · 2020–2023 · $10k · revenue +162%
- BIBAITULMAAL INC3× · 2023–2025 · $9k · revenue +44%
THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $3k
- FVFox Valley Islamic Centerone grant, 2021 · $2k
- IIMRCone grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Zakat, aid and charity assisting humanity (zacah) is a minnesota-based grassroots organization dedicated to the collection and re-distribution of wealth, including zakat (mandatory charitable tax for all muslims) and sadaqah (any…
To provide food and shelter to the poor people of pakistan
How this is measured
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Health and Hope Charity ↗
- Who funds THE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds BAITULMAAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds ZAFAR AND ATIA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HELPING BLIND PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I ↗
- Who funds Indian Muslim Relief and Charities ↗
- Who funds A CONTINUOUS CHARITY ↗
- Who funds Pakistan Childrens Heart Foundation North America Inc ↗
- Who funds LAS COLINAS ISLAMIC CENTER ↗
- Who funds BANGLADESH AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MUSLIM AID FOR HUMA ↗
- Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Sadagaat-USA ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amin & Rubina Chikhalia Foundation · American Muslim Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Verizon Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Analog Devices Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Siddiqui Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Siddiqui Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Siddiqui’s filings →