Skip to content
Shoup Foundation Xxxxx0008 at a glance

· Private foundation

Shoup Foundation Xxxxx0008

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$58kHuman Services$22kFood & Nutrition$22kHealth$14kEducation$4k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$413k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAITH EVANGELICAL CHURCH$15,000
FOOD BANK FOR LARIMER COUNTY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $5k → 11%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $3k → 11%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $3k → 11%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $2k → 11%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $2k → 11%ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$102k · 5 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$102k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+15%

Still filing today

60%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    The Food Bank for Larimer County
    5× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +21%
  • HO
    HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +11%
  • LC
    LIFE CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER ROBERTS
    4× · 2020–2023 · $10k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • GF
    Grand Family Coalition Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -80%
  • CK
    COMMUNITY KITCHEN
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +11%
  • SM
    ST MATTHEWS MEDICAL CLINIC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeastern Utah Friends Against Family Violence

Friends Against Family Violence (FAFV) is a community based nonprofit domestic violence program. FAFV provides services, shelter, crisis intervention, and prevention in the Tri-County of Uintah, Duchesne, and Daggett. We provide services…

Health
2
Family Kitchen

To provide nutritious meals to anyone in need in a safe and caring environment.

Food & Nutrition
3
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
4
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

—
5
Colorado Homeless Families Inc

CHF assists working families in their quest to go from homelessness to self-sufficiency for life.

Housing & Shelter
6
Harvest Home Inc

Harvest Home transforms the lives of unhoused, pregnant women and their children by providing housing, support, and programs that equip women to become great mothers. In December 2024, Harvest Home welcomed our first family (pregnant woman…

Human Services
7
Grace Home Inc

To serve women struggling with unplanned pregnancy by providing housing, food and life training to meet the physical, emotional and spiritual needs of the mother and baby.

Housing & Shelter
8
Homebound Meals Inc

The Organization's mission is to assist shut-ins, usually the elderly, by delivering hot, nutritious and low-cost meals to them in their homes.

—
9
Family Crisis Shelter Inc

Emergency shelter for victims of domestic abuse and supportive services to all victims of abuse

Human Services
10
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…

—
11
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

—
12
Transformation House

To provide free transitional housing to women, mothers and children who are survivors of domestic violence and help them work towards self-sufficiency.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crossroads Safehouse Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dementia Together. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAITH EVANGELICAL CHURCH: $56,043 · OtherFAITH EVANGELICAL CHURCHINTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INC: $4,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INCST MATTHEWS MEDICAL CLINIC: $3,000 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $17,500 · Food & NutritionThe Food Bank for La…COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $3,198 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY KITCHENMEALS ON WHEELS OF LOVELAND AND BERTHOUD INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionHOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $14,900 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY…Grand Family Coalition Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesGrand Family Coalit…Alternatives to Violence Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesLIFE CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER ROBERTS: $10,000 · HealthLIFE CHOIC…Dementia Together: $1,000 · HealthDementia T…BE THE GIFT INCORPORATED: $2,000 · Religion
Other$64,043Food & Nutrition$21,698Human Services$20,900Health$11,000Religion$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $14,900 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLIFE CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER ROBERTS: $10,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGrand Family Coalition Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN: $3,198 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBE THE GIFT INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF LOVELAND AND BERTHOUD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDementia Together: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlternatives to Violence Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Colorado Gives Founda…Anschutz Family Found…United Way of Larimer…Otter Cares Foundatio…The Nordson Corporati…Daniels FundEl Pomar FoundationXcel Energy FoundationThrivent Charitable I…The Food Bank for Lar…Woodward Governor Cha…
Community Foundation of Northern ColoradoCO26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · Colorado Gives Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · United Way of Larimer County · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Daniels Fund · El Pomar Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · The Food Bank for Larimer County · Woodward Governor Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shoup Foundation Xxxxx0008 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shoup Foundation Xxxxx0008. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shoup Foundation Xxxxx0008’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home