Skip to content

· Public charity

Shoreshim Inc

Shoreshim provides Jewish religious services and education with emphasis on charitable work including collection for immediate distribution non-perishable food to 4 local non-profit food pantries.

$293k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$11kReligion$7kHousing & Shelter$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kPhilanthropy$1kInternational$750Health$270
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $4,800, the rows itemized in this filing. The $292,972 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $288,172 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$400
Median grant
4
States reached
$106k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Annes Episcopal$2,200
Cornerstones$1,000
FACETS$400
The Blue Card$400
World Central Kitchen$400
Makom Group Homes$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Blue Card: $400 → 17%Makom Group Homes: $400 → 8%Family PASS: $250 → 6%Jewish Foundation Group Homes: $318 → 8%World Central Kitchen: $400 → 14%FACETS: $400 → 6%Family Pass: $250 → 6%Cornerstones: $5k → 6%Cornerstones: $1k → 6%Cornerstones: $1k → 6%Cornerstones: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19k · 6 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$19k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CORNERSTONES INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue -5%
  • SA
    ST ANNES EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    5× · 2021–2025 · $7k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue -40%

Funded once

  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue -20%
  • PF
    Parkinson Foundation of the National Capital Areagraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $270 · revenue +28%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    one grant, 2024 · $250 · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Family Service

Mission: Inspired by their history and values, Jewish Family Service supports the needs of Jewish individuals and families, refugees and immigrants, and the broader community to achieve well-being, health, and stability. From food security…

Human Services
2
Metropolitan New York Coordinating Council On Jewish Poverty

Metropolitan ny coordinating council is a not-for-profit organization which serves as a primary advocate for the social welfare needs of the poor, near-poor and elderly in the metro ny area. the entity is dedicated to the alleviation of…

Human Services
3
Jewish Family Services of Greenwich

Jewish family services of greenwich (jfs) is a nonprofit social service agency dedicated to strengthening individuals and families in fairfield and new london counties. jfs provides behavioral health counseling, food security programs,…

—
4
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
5
Family Crisis Centers Inc

Walk with people facing violence, offering safety, support, and hope as they heal and rebuild. with every step forward, we build stronger, more resilient communities.

Human Services
6
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
7
The Jewish Federations of North America Inc

The federation movement protects and enhances the well-being of jews worldwide through the values of tikkun olam (repairing the world), tzedakah (charity and social justice) and torah (jewish learning). the jewish federations of north…

Philanthropy
8
Jewish Family Service & Children's Center of Clifton-Passaicinc

Jewish family service and children's center of clifton-passaic is a social services and mental health agency that seeks to enhance the lives of indiviuals and families. the organization offers psychotherapy, psychiatry, geriatric, crisis…

Human Services
9
International Fellowship of Christians & Jews Inc

The international fellowship of christian and jews is the leading non-profit building bridges between christians and jews, blessing israel and the jewish people around the world with, humanitarian care and life-saving aid.

—
10
Jewish Family and Community Services East Bay

Guided by jewish values and in collaboration with the diverse communities we serve, jfcs east bay contributes to the resilience of communities, families, and individuals through advocacy and comprehensive support services at every stage of…

Health
11
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Pittsburgh

Jewish family and children's service supports people through life's changes and challenges while providing quality and affordable social services.

Human Services
12
Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc

The mission of the greater miami jewish federation is to mobilize human and financial resources to care for those in need, strengthen jewish life and advance the unity, values and shared purpose of the jewish people in miami, in israel and…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pathway Homes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Virginia Congress of Parents and Teachers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
5/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CORNERSTONES INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONES INCFACETS CARES INC: $800 · Human ServicesFACETS CARES INCJEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES INC: $718 · Human ServicesJEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES INCFAMILY PRESERVATION AND STRENGTHENING SERVICES: $500 · Human ServicesTHE BLUE CARD INC: $400 · Human ServicesST ANNES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $6,600 · OtherST ANNES EPISCOPAL CHURCHWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: $500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $250 · InternationalPATHWAY HOMES INC: $1,000 · HealthParkinson Foundation of the National Capital Area: $270 · HealthJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $1,000 · PhilanthropyISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $250 · Public Safety & Disaster
Human Services$11,418Other$6,600International$1,750Health$1,270Philanthropy$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORNERSTONES INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAY HOMES INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFACETS CARES INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES INC: $718 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PRESERVATION AND STRENGTHENING SERVICES: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetParkinson Foundation of the National Capital Area: $270 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Closet of the Greater Herndon Area IncVA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Closet of the Greater Herndon Area Inc · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shoreshim Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shoreshim Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shoreshim Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Shoreshim Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shoreshim’s filings →

    More from the funding graph