Skip to content
Shoop Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Shoop Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$456kYouth Development$98kPhilanthropy$95kHousing & Shelter$40kHuman Services$5k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Northern Colorado Fou$40,000
Boys and Girls Club of Weld County$10,000
United Way of Weld County$10,000
Resurrection Christian School$10,000
The Success Foundation$5,000
Friends of a Woman's Place$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Averys Light: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$643k · 5 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$643k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+179%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $265k · revenue +2%
  • TS
    The Success Foundation Serving Greeley-Evans Schools Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $181k · revenue +394%
  • TB
    THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $88k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • UW
    United Way of Weld County Weld Reco
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • GW
    Greater WY Longs Peak Council BSA
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • AL
    Averys Lightgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +179%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION: $265,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATIONThe Success Foundation Serving Greeley-Evans Schools Inc: $180,513 · EducationThe Success Foundation Serving Greeley-Evans Schools Inc+1 more: $10,000 · EducationTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY INC: $87,500 · OtherTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS O…FRIENDS OF A WOMANS PLACE: $40,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF A WOMANS PLACEUnited Way of Weld County Weld Reco: $25,000 · OtherUnited Way of Weld County …Greater WY Longs Peak Council BSA: $10,000 · OtherGreater WY Longs Peak Coun…UNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC: $70,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY …Averys Light: $5,000 · Human Services
Education$455,513Other$162,500Philanthropy$70,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION: $265,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetThe Success Foundation Serving Greeley-Evans Schools Inc: $180,513 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY INC: $87,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF A WOMANS PLACE: $40,000 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetRESURRECTION CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAverys Light: $5,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Success Foundation Serving Greeley-Evans Schools Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF A WOMANS PLACE ↗
  • Who funds RESURRECTION CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Averys Light ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Otter Cares Foundatio…Wenaas Family Foundat…Weld Community Founda…Tointon Family Founda…The Weld TrustEl Pomar FoundationColorado Gives Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATIONCO19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Wenaas Family Foundation · Weld Community Foundation · Tointon Family Foundation · The Weld Trust · El Pomar Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shoop Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shoop Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shoop Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home