Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sholl-Freede Foundation

To provide a more compassionate and sustainable future for people all around the world through preservation of the planet, education, advocacy, and the protection and healing of vulnerable communities including children, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt from federal income…

$517k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$188k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.

International$615kEducation$465kHealth$210kHuman Services$200kCivil Rights$136kArts & Culture$85kRecreation & Sports$60kPhilanthropy$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $250k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $238k
$15,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$156k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Foundation for the Defense of Democracie$187,500
To Be Honest$50,000
Tikva Childrens Home$40,000
Common Circles Inc$25,000
The Gaza Children Village$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Emilio Nares Foundation$20,000
Lucky Duck Foundation$20,000
Canary NGO Ltd$15,000
Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficki$15,000
Project Peanut Butter$15,000
Sabal Enabling Disable Children$15,000
Airbnborg$10,000
Information & Referral Federation of LA$10,000
Rachels Challenge$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $152k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A Breeze of Hope: $5k → 10%Hands On Tzedakah: $10k → 11%Rachel's Challenge: $50k → 8%GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL: $57k → 17%Rachels Challenge: $10k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER CHICAGO: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
DE
KS
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$775k · 5 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +119% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
27

Total granted

$775k
$766k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+119%
0%

Still filing today

100%
96%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $407k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TIKVA CORP
    5× · 2021–2025 · $465k · revenue +583%
  • TB
    TO BE HONEST
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue +288%
  • US
    UNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $60k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • FF
    Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • WO
    WORLD OF CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue -90%
  • GI
    GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $57k · revenue +414%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Impact Forum Foundation

The Impact Forum is an exclusive network of philanthropists. We are connecting philanthropists that support each others initiatives and collaborate to empower and meet with exceptional non-profit organizations to fight antisemitism,…

Philanthropy
2
For Zions Sake

Global disaster relief, humanitarian aid and comfort for israel and the nations.

International
3
Friends of United Hatzalah Inc

Friends of united hatzalah, inc .(fouh) raises and provides funding to not-for-profit organizations that provide medical and trauma-related first responder services in israel and around the world. fouh focuses the majority of its support…

Arts & Culture
4
Global Jewry Ltd

To connect and strengthen the global jewish community by bridging internal divides and addressing external challenges. we use social media and offer a number of "signature programs" to achieve our goals.

Religion
5
Sherit Isroel
—
6
Belev Echad Inc

Belev echad is an international nonprofit dedicated to restoring the wounded men and women of the idf back to life through physical, medical, legal, emotional, and financial support. our extensive therapies and programs help the soldiers…

Human Services
7
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
8
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
9
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
10
Foundation Stone Institute Inc

To promote a positive relationship between catholics and israelis.

—
11
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
12
American Society for Technion Israel Institute of Technology Inc

The american technion society supports the technion's critical research and (continued on sch o)

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Bshvil Hamachar Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyGovernment Accountability R…Jewish Community FederationsEducation Equity LeadershipYouth Sports Booster Organi…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Cancer Support OrganizationsCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…Substance Abuse TreatmentPublic University Foundatio…Community Health CentersCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%12%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%7%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%51%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/45
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,520

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
19/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TIKVA CORP — $465,000 · EducationTIKVA CORPTO BE HONEST — $60,000 · EducationTO BE HONESTJuan Felipe Escobar Foundation Inc — $25,000 · Education+1 more — $10,000 · EducationFoundation for the Defense of Democracie — $187,500 · OtherFoundation for the Defense of Democ…WORLD OF CHILDREN INC — $60,000 · OtherWORLD OF CHILDREN INCFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOU…GAZA CHILDREN VILLAGE — $25,000 · OtherCommon Circles Inc — $25,000 · OtherUNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATION — $60,000 · OtherUNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATIONEIGHTEEN FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherEIGHTEEN FOUNDATION+15 more — $153,498 · Other+15 moreFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $100,000 · InternationalFoundation fo…FRIENDS OF BSHVIL HAMACHAR INC — $30,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF BS…THE INTERNATIONAL NETWORK FOR AID RELIEF AND ASSISTANCE INC — $25,000 · InternationalTHE INTERNATI…CHERNOBYL CHILDREN'S PROJECT INTERNATIONAL INC — $25,000 · InternationalCHERNOBYL CHI…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $20,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF TH…PROJECT PEANUT BUTTER — $15,000 · InternationalPROJECT PEANU…THE LITTLE MARKET INC — $10,000 · International+1 more — $5,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC — $130,000 · HealthAMERICAN FR…LUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthLUCKY DUCK …Emilio Nares Foundation — $20,000 · HealthEmilio Nare…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $20,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINA…THE RELEASE RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · HealthRACHEL'S CHALLENGE — $60,000 · Human ServicesGLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA INC — $57,000 · Human ServicesJewish Community Centers of Chicago — $20,000 · Human ServicesHANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC — $10,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesCapital for Good USA — $50,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICA GIVES INC — $25,000 · PhilanthropyMERIT SPREAD FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyCENTER FOR JEWISH CULTURE & CREATIVITY — $50,000 · Arts & CultureARTOLUTION INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $10,000 · Arts & CultureNOAHS ARC FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$560,000Other$610,998International$230,000Health$200,000Human Services$152,000Philanthropy$110,000Arts & Culture$95,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIKVA CORP — $465,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC — $130,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRACHEL'S CHALLENGE — $60,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetWORLD OF CHILDREN INC — $60,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTO BE HONEST — $60,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATION — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA INC — $57,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEIGHTEEN FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR JEWISH CULTURE & CREATIVITY — $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCapital for Good USA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF BSHVIL HAMACHAR INC — $30,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL NETWORK FOR AID RELIEF AND ASSISTANCE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHERNOBYL CHILDREN'S PROJECT INTERNATIONAL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetJuan Felipe Escobar Foundation Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTOLUTION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMERIT SPREAD FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Community Centers of Chicago — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA LEG TO STAND ON INC — $18,880 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCanary NGO Ltd — $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCOALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKING — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LITTLE MARKET INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOAHS ARC FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE RELEASE RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCOMBAT HATE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER TEL HASHOMER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHeart to Heart Global Cardiac Care — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundJewish Community Foun…Combined Jewish Phila…Jewish Community Foun…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Tides FoundationThe Snider FoundationNational Philanthropi…Silicon Valley Commun…Gs Donor Advised Phil…California Community …Vanguard Charitable E…
Jewish Communal FundNY20.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Tides Foundation · The Snider Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · California Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sholl-Freede Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sholl-Freede Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sholl-Freede Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines