Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Shiraz and Leili Wildlife Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$628k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$611k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Animals$1.2MInternational$279kFood & Nutrition$66kPublic Safety & Disaster$45kHealth$25kYouth Development$18kReligion$15kHousing & Shelter$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $17k
  • $250k+1 grant · $611k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KENYA WILDLIFE SERVICE$611,340
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC$5,000
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC$2,000
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC$2,000
FRIENDS OF TRI-CITIES ANIMAL SHELTER$2,000
INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS$2,000
CASTAWAY ANIMALS RESCUE EFFORT$1,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT LONG TERM SUPPORT TR$1,000
THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE$1,000
LIGHTHOUSE MISSION MINISTRIES$650
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving35% of grant dollars ($579k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 65% that went abroad ($1.1M) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BIG CAT RESCUE: $1k → 13%FORGOTTEN CHILDRENS FUND: $4k → 7%BIG CAT RESCUE: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
NY
WY
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US65% of all-years giving ($1.1M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Kenya$1.1M · 4 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Shiraz and Leili Wildlife Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Shiraz and Leili Wildlife Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 73% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 26 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
32

Total granted

$1.6M
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+76%

Still filing today

65%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsInternationalHuman ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +98%
  • AT
    Alternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank
    7× · 2017–2023 · $56k · revenue +99%
  • NG
    NEW GENERATION MINISTRIES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $46k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • MS
    MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC - DOCTORS WITHOUT
    one grant, 2022 · $24k
  • SW
    SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • U
    UMCOR
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
2
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
3
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
4
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
5
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
6
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
7
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
8
Shelter From the Storm Animal Rescue Inc

Reduce the euthanasia rate of healthy and adoptable animals and improve the lives of companion animals by finding permanent homes for animals in need, providing support to communities who do not have access to humane organizations,…

9
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
10
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
11
Animal Samaritans

At Animal Samaritans we champion compassion and respect for all living creatures, with a primary focus on dogs, cats, and the people who love them. We view pets not merely as animals, but as members of our families. As their guardians and…

Animals
12
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa and the most unlike its peers is The Costco Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Development CentersFood Pantries & AssistanceVeteran Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Animal Rescue and AdoptionWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr16%32%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/40
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,525

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
29/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KENYA WILDLIFE SERVICE — $1,091,049 · OtherKENYA WILDLIFE SERVICE+31 more — $165,656 · Other+31 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $64,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRO…NEW GENERATION MINISTRIES — $46,000 · InternationalNEW GENERATION MI…DIRECT RELIEF — $39,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFInternational Rescue Committee INC — $34,000 · InternationalInternational Res…CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC — $17,000 · InternationalCATHOLIC MEDICAL …ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA — $12,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $12,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $10,000 · InternationalALIGHT — $9,000 · International+2 more — $7,000 · InternationalTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE — $23,000 · AnimalsPAWS CHICAGO — $13,000 · AnimalsOLD DOG HAVEN — $9,000 · AnimalsANIMAL DEFENSE LEAGUE OF TEXAS — $4,000 · AnimalsCastaway Animals Rescue Effort — $3,900 · AnimalsPETSMART CHARITIES INC — $3,000 · AnimalsBIG OAK WOLF SANCTUARY INC — $3,000 · Animals+5 more — $7,500 · AnimalsAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank — $56,068 · Food & NutritionBoys & Girls Clubs of Whatcom County — $18,000 · Youth DevelopmentSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA — $15,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $1,000 · HealthFORGOTTEN CHILDRENS FUND — $3,500 · Human ServicesBIG CAT RESCUE CORP — $1,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,000 · Human Services
Other$1,256,705International$250,500Animals$66,400Food & Nutrition$56,068Youth Development$18,000Health$16,000Human Services$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $64,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank — $56,068 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNEW GENERATION MINISTRIES — $46,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $39,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $34,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE — $23,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Whatcom County — $18,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC — $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA — $15,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO — $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLD DOG HAVEN — $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetALIGHT — $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN INCORPORATED — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL DEFENSE LEAGUE OF TEXAS — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCastaway Animals Rescue Effort — $3,900 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPETSMART CHARITIES INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG OAK WOLF SANCTUARY INC — $3,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFoothills Food Bank — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOEXISTENCE STORY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHATCOM HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF TRI-CITIES ANIMAL SHELTER — $2,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetBIG CAT RESCUE CORP — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST ORGANIZATION FOR ANIMAL HELP — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds Alternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank
  • Who funds NEW GENERATION MINISTRIES
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Whatcom County
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC
  • Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA
  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO
  • Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds OLD DOG HAVEN
  • Who funds ALIGHT
  • Who funds CHILDREN INCORPORATED
  • Who funds ANIMAL DEFENSE LEAGUE OF TEXAS
  • Who funds Castaway Animals Rescue Effort
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN CHILDRENS FUND
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PETSMART CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds BIG OAK WOLF SANCTUARY INC
  • Who funds Foothills Food Bank
  • Who funds COEXISTENCE STORY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE21.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Mary H Storer Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Whatcom Community Foundation · Little Family Legacy Foundation · Jerry H Walton Foundation · Mount Baker Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Tucker Family Foundation · North Sound Accountable Community of Health · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Albertsons Companies Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shiraz and Leili Wildlife Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph