Skip to content
Shingleton Tuw at a glance

· Private foundation

Shingleton Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$162k
Granted FY2025still arriving
82
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$241kHealth$217kEducation$195kPublic Safety & Disaster$103kArts & Culture$64kHousing & Shelter$63kHuman Services$42kPublic Benefit$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 82 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k76 grants · $95k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $67k
$811
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT$16,500
FOUNDATION FOR REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT$10,000
DR TERRY SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC INC$10,000
VIRGINIA FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT$10,000
WINCHESTER AREA TEMPORARY THERMAL SHELTE$10,000
2 FOR 2 FOUNDATION$10,000
SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY$7,600
LOVE TO NIC$7,500
NORTHWESTERN WORKSHOP INC$6,611
WINCHESTER MEDICAL CTR FDN$5,000
GAINESBORO FIRE AND RESCUE$3,213
VIRGINIA ASSN FOR THE BLIND$3,211
UNITED WAY OF N SHENANDOAH VALLEY$3,211
EBENEZER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,811
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$1,611
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BURLINGTON UNITED METHODIST: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 101 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

101 repeat relationships: 80 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

101
27

Total granted

$1.0M
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+9%

Still filing today

22%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPublic Safety & DisasterHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2025 · $112k · revenue +39%
  • WA
    WINCHESTER AREA TEMPORARY THERMAL SHELTER INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue +337%
  • CC
    CONGREGATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $32k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • FM
    FREE MEDICAL CLINIC OF
    one grant, 2017 · $23k
  • VC
    VIRGINIA CENTER FOR LITERARY ARTS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • LF
    LORD FAIRFAX EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Winchester Volunteer Fire Department

to prevent the loss of life and to control or reduce the loss of property by applying all of our knowledge and resources.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Nokesville Volunteer Fire Department

Fire and rescue services

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Buckingham County Vol Fire Department Dba Dillwyn Fire Department

The purpose of the Buckingham County Vol. Fire Dept. is to provide fire protection to the citizens of Buckingham County and surrounding counties if needed. We also respond to automobile accidents as well as any other request for assistance.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Virgilina Volunteer Fire Association

The virgilina volunteer fire association's primary exempt purpose is to provide fire suppression and emergency medical assistance to their designated district.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Association of Stafford Volunteer Fire Department Co Eng 2 Inc

Provide fire suppression for the citizens of stafford county, virginia and surrounding jusidictions.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Flemington Volunteer Fire Department Inc

To provide volunteer fire fighting services in the flemington, wv region.

—
7
Snowville Volunteer Fire Dept Inc

Public safety

—
8
Sterling Volunteer Fire Co Inc

The sterling volunteer fire company, inc. operates out of four fire stations to provide fire protection to the residences of sterling va and surrounting areas.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Burkeville Volunteer Fire Department

The organization provides emergency, medical, and fire fighting services to the citizens in and around the Burkeville, Virginia area.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Co Inc

Fire prevention and protection in bluemont and surrounding areas

—
11
New Manchester Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Fire fighting

—
12
Brookneal Volunteer Fire Department Inc

To provide firefighting and rescue services to residents and businesses of selected areas of campbell county, virginia.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shenandoah Area Council Boy Scouts of America; the most unlike its peers is Star Tannery Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WINCHESTER FIRE AND RESCUE FND: $67,474 · OtherWINCHESTER FIRE AND RESCUE FNDVIRGINIA FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT: $35,000 · OtherCONGREGATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT INC: $31,900 · OtherNORTHWESTERN WORKSHOP INC: $30,617 · Other+113 more: $580,871 · Other+113 moreSHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY: $111,600 · EducationSHENANDOAH UNIVER…THE VIRGINIA COLLEGE FUND: $34,000 · EducationTHE VIRGINIA COLL…FREMONT STREET NURSERY: $10,617 · EducationFREMONT STREET NU…BOYS HOME INC: $10,617 · EducationBOYS HOME INCVA FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $9,000 · EducationDR TERRY SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC INC: $67,500 · HealthDR TERRY S…LEARY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthLEARY EDUC…EASTER SEALS UCP NORTH CAROLINA & VIRGINIA INC: $8,517 · HealthEASTER SEA…VCU Health Childrens Services at Brook Road: $4,100 · HealthWINCHESTER AREA TEMPORARY THERMAL SHELTER INC: $42,000 · Housing & ShelterShenandoah Arts Council Inc: $30,000 · Arts & Culture2 for 2 Foundation Inc: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsGirl Scout Council of the Nation's Capital: $8,517 · Youth Development
Other$745,862Education$175,834Health$105,117Housing & Shelter$42,000Arts & Culture$30,000Recreation & Sports$15,000Youth Development$8,517

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY: $111,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDR TERRY SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC INC: $67,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetWINCHESTER AREA TEMPORARY THERMAL SHELTER INC: $42,000 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetTHE VIRGINIA COLLEGE FUND: $34,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCONGREGATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT INC: $31,900 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetShenandoah Arts Council Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetLEARY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSHENANDOAH AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $17,617 over 6y, 0.8% of budget2 for 2 Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetWINCHESTER DAY NURSERY INC: $10,617 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFREMONT STREET NURSERY: $10,617 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS HOME INC: $10,617 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCONCERN HOTLINE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetVA FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $9,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEASTER SEALS UCP NORTH CAROLINA & VIRGINIA INC: $8,517 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Scout Council of the Nation's Capital: $8,517 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVCU Health Childrens Services at Brook Road: $4,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBURLINGTON UNITED METHODIST FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHAWNEE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1,691 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetREYNOLDS STORE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $1,414 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSTAR TANNERY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1,414 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDSHIP FIRE COMPANY NUMBER ONE: $1,414 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH END FIRE COMPANY: $1,134 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBOYCE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC: $330 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DR TERRY SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER AREA TEMPORARY THERMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VIRGINIA COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Shenandoah Arts Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds LEARY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds 2 for 2 Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER DAY NURSERY INC ↗
  • Who funds FREMONT STREET NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN HOTLINE INC ↗
  • Who funds VA FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT COLLEGES ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS UCP NORTH CAROLINA & VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scout Council of the Nation's Capital ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Woodmark Fou…The Bank of Clarke Co…United Way of Norther…The Community Foundat…John L Harrell & Marg…The Community Foundat…Truist Foundation IncNetwork for GoodFidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
American Woodmark Foundation IncVA27.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Woodmark Foundation Inc · The Bank of Clarke County Foundation · United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley Inc · The Community Foundation of the Northern Shenandoah Valley · John L Harrell & Margaret T Harrell Charitable Trust C/O First Bank Trustee · The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham County · Truist Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shingleton Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shingleton Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 130 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shingleton Tuw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home