Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Shen Catalyst Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$587kHealth$125kHuman Services$16kYouth Development$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kFood & Nutrition$2kHousing & Shelter$1kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $77k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CUREBOUND$32,000
UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION$25,000
GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION$20,000
PACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL$6,000
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $2k → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%ELDERHELP: $375 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$701k · 12 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$701k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
-3%

Still filing today

83%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    PACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $436k · revenue +50%
  • US
    UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2025 · $103k · revenue +78%
  • C
    CUREBOUND
    5× · 2018–2025 · $97k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -70%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD
    one grant, 2018 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
4
San Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation

To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.

Education
5
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
6
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
7
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
8
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
9
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
10
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
11
Rady Children's Hospital San Diego

To restore, sustain and enhance the health and developmental potential of children through excellence in care, education, research and advocacy.

Health
12
University of San Diego

The university of san diego is a contemporary catholic university, grounded in the liberal arts and anchored along an international border, advancing academic excellence to create a more inclusive, sustainable and hopeful world.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uc San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Immunotherapy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealthcare Institutions and…Jewish Community Organizati…Independent K-6 SchoolsAffordable Housing Developm…Youth Sports ProgramsPolicy Research & AdvocacyUniversity Foundation Suppo…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr17%39%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr13%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr17%77%20–35yr11%4%35–55yr13%4%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/25
the rest of the field
15%
11,595/77,553

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
13/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL — $435,628 · EducationPACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOLUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $102,725 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Education+1 more — $1,500 · EducationCUREBOUND — $96,950 · HealthCUREBOUND+2 more — $2,200 · HealthRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $23,000 · PhilanthropyRANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $9,750 · PhilanthropySEACREST FOUNDATION — $1,500 · Philanthropy+1 more — $500 · PhilanthropyRANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDAT — $16,600 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY — $3,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $2,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES UNITED FUTBOL ACADEMY — $1,000 · OtherJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $1,000 · Other+11 more — $4,613 · OtherELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO — $7,375 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,500 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES — $2,500 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentPENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED — $500 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $500 · InternationalSAHASRA DEEPIKA FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION INC — $365 · International
Education$559,853Health$99,150Philanthropy$34,750Other$28,213Human Services$12,375Youth Development$2,500International$1,365

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL — $435,628 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $102,725 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCUREBOUND — $96,950 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $23,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO SANTA FE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $9,750 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO — $7,375 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEACREST FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES UNITED FUTBOL ACADEMY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMMUNOTHERAPY FOUNDATION — $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESLEY HOUSE STUDENT RESIDENCE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAHASRA DEEPIKA FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION INC — $365 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Sempra Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shen Catalyst Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph