Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sheldon L and Pearl R Leibowitz- Lew Leibowitz Legacy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$760k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$716kEnvironment$418kHousing & Shelter$355kFood & Nutrition$290kCivil Rights$275kInternational$230kPhilanthropy$150kHuman Services$91kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $305k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $455k
$40,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ARK$160,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$72,500
ACLU$70,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$52,500
NRDC$50,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$50,000
FEEDING AMERICA$40,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$40,000
NIGHT MINISTRY$35,000
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW & POLICY CENTER$35,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING$30,000
JEWISH COUNCIL ON URBAN AFFAIRS$30,000
ALL CHICAGO$30,000
CHICAGO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$25,000
OPENLANDS$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $126k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NIGHT MINISTRY: $35k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $25k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $20k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $20k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $13k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $10k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS INC: $70 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 17 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
0

Total granted

$3.1M
$0

Still filing today

76%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterEnvironmentInternationalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $243k · revenue +63%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $195k · revenue +17%
  • Feeding America
    6× · 2020–2025 · $185k · revenue +40%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Conservation International Foundation

    Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

    Environment
    2
    Chicago's Environmental Fund
    —
    3
    Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

    We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

    Environment
    4
    World Resources Institute

    Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

    International
    5
    The Global FoodBanking Network

    To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

    International
    6
    Rainforest Alliance Inc

    RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

    —
    7
    One Earth Philanthropy

    One Earth connects thinkers, doers, activists, and knowledge holders from around the world to solve humanity's greatest ecological challenges--together. Our belief is simple: The solutions to the climate crisis already exist. By connecting…

    Environment
    8
    Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

    Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

    Food & Nutrition
    9
    Floresta Usa Incorporated

    Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

    International
    10
    Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

    RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

    Environment
    11
    Chicago Area Fair Housing Alliance

    Cafha provides training and technical assistance to a wide array of stakeholders combating housing discrimination and promoting equitable place-based opportunity through education, advocacy, and collaborative action.

    —
    12
    The Global Hunger Project

    The hunger project is working to create a world without hunger through women-centered, holistic development strategies that address the root causes of hunger and poverty. in 2025, it reached nearly 12.7 million people in over 10,000…

    International
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Openlands; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    14/14
    Grantees still filing
    10/14
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE ARK: $876,220 · OtherTHE ARKACLU: $345,000 · OtherACLUTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $242,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYNRDC: $200,000 · OtherNRDCCOMMUNITY PARTNERS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING: $105,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PARTNERS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSINGOPENLANDS: $61,000 · OtherGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $195,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHIC…Feeding America: $185,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding Amer…CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $150,000 · Housing & ShelterCHICAGO COA…ALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY: $110,000 · Housing & ShelterALL CHICAGO…DEBORAH'S PLACE: $95,000 · Housing & ShelterDEBORAH'S P…International Rescue Committee INC: $242,500 · InternationalInternatio…OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $60,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMER…ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST: $135,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $127,000 · EnvironmentTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $116,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY FOCUS LEGACY: $10,070 · Human ServicesJewish Council on Urban Affairs: $120,000 · Community Improvement
    Other$1,829,720Food & Nutrition$380,000Housing & Shelter$355,000International$302,500Environment$262,000Human Services$126,070Community Improvement$120,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $242,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $242,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $195,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $185,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $150,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST: $135,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $127,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Council on Urban Affairs: $120,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $116,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY: $110,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDEBORAH'S PLACE: $95,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetOPENLANDS: $61,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY FOCUS LEGACY: $10,070 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
    • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
    • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
    • Who funds Feeding America ↗
    • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
    • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST ↗
    • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
    • Who funds Jewish Council on Urban Affairs ↗
    • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
    • Who funds ALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY ↗
    • Who funds DEBORAH'S PLACE ↗
    • Who funds OPENLANDS ↗
    • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
    • Who funds FAMILY FOCUS LEGACY ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Polk Bros Foundation IncIL15.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Polk Bros Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · AbbVie Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Sheldon L and Pearl R Leibowitz- Lew Leibowitz Legacy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sheldon L and Pearl R Leibowitz- Lew Leibowitz Legacy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
    • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sheldon L and Pearl R Leibowitz- Lew Leibowitz Legacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph