Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shelby Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$68kHealth$64kHousing & Shelter$58kAnimals$35kFood & Nutrition$29kYouth Development$16kReligion$12kEducation$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$699k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Homeless Children IRC$8,000
Duke - Hardin Family ALS$5,000
Chapel Hill Public Library Foundation$5,000
Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina$5,000
North Carolina Ballet$2,500
Ackland Art Museum$2,000
Vero Beach Museum of Art$2,000
Larimer Humane Society$2,000
Youth Sailing Foundation$2,000
Rocky Mountain Raptor Program$2,000
The Cedars Education Program$1,500
Playmakers Repertory Company$1,000
Carolina Performing Arts$1,000
Off the Hook Arts$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Camp Kesem: $1k → 14%Camp Kesem: $500 → 14%Camp Kesem: $300 → 14%Matthew's House: $250 → 11%Table: $2k → 13%Table: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
IN
OH
CT
CA
CO
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$280k · 29 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +50% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
29

Total granted

$280k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+50%

Still filing today

34%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VB
    VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $17k · revenue ×12
  • NH
    Noco Humane
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +93%
  • CAROLINA BALLET INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $12k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • OC
    ORCA CONSERVANCYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +83%
  • CH
    COLORADO HORSE RESCUEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +299%
  • NC
    Northern Colorado Beekeepers Associ
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
2
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
3
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
4
Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition
5
Colorado Nonprofit Association

Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.

Community Improvement
6
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
7
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
8
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
9
Colorado Children's Campaign

The colorado children's campaign relentlessly champions the needs of children. we leverage data, research, and relationships to unapologetically advocate for kids, fighting for a brighter, more equitable future for every child in colorado.…

—
10
Community Radio for Northern Colorado

Community radio for northern colorado's (crnc) mission is to strengthen our community by cultivating the mind and spirit - informing, inspiring, and entertaining. crnc strives to meet its mission by operating two public media services -…

Arts & Culture
11
Public Broadcasting of Colorado Inc

To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms

Arts & Culture
12
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Against Poverty Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Duke Cancer Institute: $46,000 · OtherDuke Cancer InstituteHomeless Children's Foundation of I: $35,000 · OtherHomeless Children's Foundation of IHOMELESS CHILDREN IRC: $23,000 · OtherHOMELESS CHILDREN IRCFood Bank of NC: $16,000 · OtherFood Bank of NCAckland Art Museum - UNC: $12,500 · OtherAckland Art Museum: $11,000 · OtherSaving Grace: $10,000 · OtherYouth Sailing Foundation of IRC: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,500 · Other+34 more: $62,920 · Other+34 moreVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $17,100 · Arts & CultureVERO BEACH …CAROLINA BALLET INC: $11,500 · Arts & CultureCAROLINA BA…NORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION: $3,600 · Arts & CultureNORTH CAROL…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureNoco Humane: $12,550 · AnimalsORCA CONSERVANCY: $4,200 · AnimalsCOLORADO HORSE RESCUE: $2,750 · Animals+2 more: $1,000 · AnimalsROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM: $11,000 · Environment+2 more: $350 · EnvironmentFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionPORCH-Durham: $600 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $250 · Food & NutritionCEDARS EDUCATION PROGRAM: $1,500 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,500 · EducationTHE WINDSOR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,400 · EducationTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationTHE CHAPEL HILL PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$235,920Arts & Culture$33,200Animals$20,500Environment$11,350Food & Nutrition$10,850Education$5,900Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $17,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNoco Humane: $12,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINA BALLET INC: $11,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM: $11,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHAPEL HILL PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetORCA CONSERVANCY: $4,200 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION: $3,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO HORSE RESCUE: $2,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTABLE MINISTRIES INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $2,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNO BARRIERS USA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS EDUCATION PROGRAM: $1,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WINDSOR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,400 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetOff the Hook Arts: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthern Colorado United for Youth: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPORCH-Durham: $600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOUNCE ANIMAL RESCUE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANTHERA CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE NORTHERN COLORADO: $450 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILE HIGH FREEDOM BAND: $300 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOLORADO RENEWABLE ENERGY SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MATTHEWS HOUSE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget350 COLORADO: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds Noco Humane ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINA BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAPTOR PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHAPEL HILL PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ORCA CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO HORSE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds TABLE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗
  • Who funds NO BARRIERS USA ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS EDUCATION PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds THE WINDSOR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Off the Hook Arts ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO23.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shelby Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shelby Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Shelby Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Shelby Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shelby Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph