Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shaw Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$26kCommunity Improvement$15kHuman Services$14kArts & Culture$9kHealth$7kPhilanthropy$7kCivil Rights$5kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
4
States reached
$9k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE BETH AM$6,554
Individual grant recipient$100
MS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (MSAA$50
AARP$15
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $875) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST ANN'S PLACE: $100 → 9%DIGNITY GROWS: $100 → 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $200 → 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $360 → 12%COVENANT HOUSE: $15 → 17%VITA NOVA: $100 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NH
WA
IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
KY
VA
AZ
NC
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$71k · 18 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
64

Total granted

$71k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+28%

Still filing today

33%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +72%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +78%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • The Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +70%
  • BC
    BALLENISLES CHARITIES FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +36%
  • ML
    MARGARET LEE SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
4
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
5
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
6
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
9
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
12
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
33/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE BETH AM: $25,674 · OtherTEMPLE BETH AMCITY OF HOPE: $15,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPEBALLEN ISLES CHARITIES: $12,325 · OtherBALLEN ISLES CHARITIES+54 more: $8,925 · Other+54 moreRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $8,262 · Arts & CultureRAYMOND F K…MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $600 · Arts & CultureMALTZ JUPIT…+2 more: $132 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $5,500 · PhilanthropyBALLENISLES CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $1,100 · Philanthropy+2 more: $50 · PhilanthropyANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $4,500 · Civil RightsBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,500 · HealthThe Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathy: $1,500 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $300 · HealthGratitude Foundation Inc f/k/a Gratitude House Inc: $200 · Health+7 more: $460 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE INC: $360 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA INC: $200 · Human ServicesANNS PLACE INC: $100 · Human ServicesDIGNITY GROWS INC: $100 · Human ServicesVita Nova Inc: $100 · Human ServicesLIVE LIKE JAKE FOUNDATION INC: $100 · Human Services+1 more: $15 · Human ServicesPLAY FOR PINK INC: $920 · Crime & Legal
Other$61,924Arts & Culture$8,994Philanthropy$6,650Civil Rights$4,500Health$3,960Human Services$975Crime & Legal$920

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $8,262 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathy: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBALLENISLES CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $920 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGratitude Foundation Inc f/k/a Gratitude House Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOICE TO CHANGE INC TRIMBLE: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetQUANTUM HOUSE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANNS PLACE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS-ON-WHEELS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEMENTIA SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIGNITY GROWS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Corona Self Help Center Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVita Nova Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE LIKE JAKE FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORTHINGTON CHRISTIAN VILLAGE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $32 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $30 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChapters Health Foundation Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLIOBLASTOMA FOUNDATION INC: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSUMER REPORTS INC: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds The Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathy ↗
  • Who funds BALLENISLES CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC ↗
  • Who funds MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Gratitude Foundation Inc f/k/a Gratitude House Inc ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHOICE TO CHANGE INC TRIMBLE ↗
  • Who funds QUANTUM HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANNS PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds SHIFTING GEARS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Richard & Elaine Ades Family Foundation IncCT24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Richard & Elaine Ades Family Foundation Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shaw Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shaw Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Vita Nova Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
  • Covenant House Florida Inc: 1% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Shaw Family Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Shaw Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shaw Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph