· Public charity
Service Employees International Union Local No 99
We pledge ourselves to provide the highest quality of services for our communities and ourselves.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL NO 99’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $120k
- $250k+1 grant · $358k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILD CARE PROVIDERS UNITED | $357,644 |
| LA COUNTY FED OF LABOR AFL-CIO | $32,500 |
| LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES | $15,000 |
| lnnerCity Struggle | $12,500 |
| UNITED FARM WORKERS | $10,000 |
| KOREAN IMMIGRANT WORKERS ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY COALITION | $10,000 |
| Alliance for a Better Community | $10,000 |
| POWER CALIFORNIA | $10,000 |
| CENTRAL COAST LABOR COUNCIL | $9,311 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $224k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $407k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SNSpecial Needs Network Inc5× · 2018–2023 · $100k · revenue +627%
- SJST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH4× · 2019–2023 · $73k · revenue +128%
- ISINNERCITY STRUGGLE7× · 2018–2024 · $73k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- SASCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES FIRSTone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -100%
- SDSEI DISASTER RELIEF FUNDone grant, 2022 · $30k
- SESERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNIONone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.
The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.
Seiu local 2015 is a chartered local union of the service employees international union and is an unincorporated, tax-exempt association currently representing bargaining unit members.
to organize workers in the laborers international union of north America, afl-cio pacific southwest region through a coordinated program to maintain and improve employment opportunities for affiliated local union members and to recruit new…
The council is a federation of approximately 85 affiliated unions. the organizaton engages in a wide range of activities. the activities are designed to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace, and…
The primary purposes of the organization are the study of economic and social conditions; the pursuit of policies aimed at effecting a more equal distribution of wealth; and the promotion of full employment.
The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.
To organize, increase collective bargaining support and publicize labor issues related to the construction industry within los angeles and orange counties.
Labor council
To protect and strengthen the rights and conditions of working people and their families.
Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…
The seiu washington state council builds collective power by uniting the strength of our locals in washington state and our collective membership of over 150,000 members. we work collaboratively to coordinate political and legislative…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles County Federation of Labor Afl-Cio and the most unlike its peers is Sei Disaster Relief Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILD CARE PROVIDERS UNITED - CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Special Needs Network Inc ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds INNERCITY STRUGGLE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT ↗
- Who funds LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAM OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES FIRST ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES COUNTY FEDERATION OF LABOR AFL-CIO ↗
- Who funds SEI DISASTER RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR A BETTER COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds POWER CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds SEIU LOCAL 284 CLC ↗
- Who funds UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds KOREAN IMMIGRANT WORKERS ADVOCATES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL COAST LABOR COUNCIL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Seiu Local 2015 · Liberty Hill Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The California Endowment · United Way Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Calls Education Fund · Teamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc · Ccf Community Initiatives Fund · The James Irvine Foundation · Community Partners
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Service Employees International Union Local No 99 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.