Skip to content

California · Public charity

Service Employees International Union Local No 99

We pledge ourselves to provide the highest quality of services for our communities and ourselves.

$193k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2024
7
Organizations funded FY2023
14%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$357,644
Organizations funded a year
2 to 8
FY2018 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$8.7M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 14% of the organizations Service Employees International Union Local No 99 funded were first-time grantees, receiving 10% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesCivil RightsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving11$487k55%
FY20237$104k14%
FY20227$97k29%
FY20215$86k20%
FY20202$20k0%
FY20198$144k50%
FY20184$40kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$581kEmployment$88kCommunity Improvement$80kHealth$73kCivil Rights$60kRecreation & Sports$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kPublic Benefit$10kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 17 grantees

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($6k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Service Employees International Union Local No 99 supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChild Care Providers United - California: $357,644 over 1y, 22% of budgetSpecial Needs Network Inc: $100,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetSt John's Community Health: $72,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetInnercity Struggle: $72,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Coalition for Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment: $70,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLabor Community Services Program of Los Angeles: $51,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSpecial Olympics Southern California Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSchools and Communities First: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLos Angeles County Federation of Labor Afl-Cio: $43,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetService Employees International Union: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Farm Workers of America: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPower California: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSeiu Local 284 Clc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKorean Immigrant Workers Advocates of Southern California: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlliance for a Better Community: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCentral Coast Labor Council: $9,311 over 1y, 2.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA21.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Seiu Local 2015 · Liberty Hill Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The California Endowment · United Way Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Calls Education Fund · Teamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc · Ccf Community Initiatives Fund · The James Irvine Foundation · Community Partners

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Service Employees International Union Local No 99 with peer funders

About Service Employees International Union Local No 99

How much does Service Employees International Union Local No 99 give?
Service Employees International Union Local No 99 reported 11 grants totaling $192,733 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 8 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.
What does Service Employees International Union Local No 99 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2024, its largest causes are Human Services (59%), Employment (9%), Community Improvement (8%).
Who are Service Employees International Union Local No 99's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2024: Child Care Providers United - California ($358k), Special Needs Network Inc ($100k), St John's Community Health ($73k).
Does Service Employees International Union Local No 99 fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 14% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Service Employees International Union Local No 99?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include California Community Foundation, Seiu Local 2015, Liberty Hill Foundation.
Where is Service Employees International Union Local No 99 based?
Service Employees International Union Local No 99 is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Service Employees International Union Local No 99’s filings →

More from the funding graph