Skip to content
Seremet Family Fdn-Rittenhouse at a glance

· Private foundation

Seremet Family Fdn-Rittenhouse

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$171k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$481kFood & Nutrition$205kEducation$127kRecreation & Sports$50kAnimals$43kHuman Services$36kReligion$30kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$747k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN REGENTS$25,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$25,000
SECOND HELPINGS$15,000
HAMILTON COUNTY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC$15,000
JANUS DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC$15,000
RILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CANVAS HEALTH INC: $5k → 6%THIRD PHASE INC: $10k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
IN
OH
PA
CA
MD
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$653k · 12 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$653k
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+41%

Still filing today

83%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionAnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    Fairview Health Services
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +13%
  • HC
    Hamilton County Harvest Food Bank Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +179%
  • UR
    URBAN ROOTS MN
    5× · 2018–2022 · $65k · revenue +326%

Funded once

  • FH
    FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +56%
  • GC
    GEIST CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • WC
    WAYZATA COMMUNITY CHURCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
4
Calvary Hospital Inc

The mission of calvary hospital is to care for the medical, emotional and spiritual needs of our adult patients with advanced cancer and other life-limiting illnesses. it is the only fully accredited acute care hospital in the u.s. devoted…

Health
5
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
6
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
7
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Northern Michigan Hematology and Oncology

Provide professional services for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and infectious disease and related conditions.

Health
9
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
10
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
12
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $175,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANURBAN ROOTS MN: $65,000 · OtherURBAN ROOTS MNMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC: $30,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE: $20,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THEGEIST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherWAYZATA COMMUNITY CHURCH FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Other+8 more: $46,000 · Other+8 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $175,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre …+1 more: $2,000 · EducationFairview Health Services: $100,000 · HealthFairview Health Serv…COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $50,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH NET…FORCE-FACING OUR RISK OF CANCER EMPOWERED INC: $10,000 · HealthFORCE-FACING OUR RIS…+3 more: $15,000 · Health+3 moreHamilton County Harvest Food Bank Inc: $75,000 · Food & NutritionHamilton County…SECOND HELPINGS INC: $45,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HELPINGS…TOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK: $15,000 · Food & NutritionTOLEDO NORTHWES…JANUS DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $45,000 · EmploymentMIDWEST ANIMAL RESCUE AND SERVICES: $40,000 · AnimalsTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $2,500 · AnimalsFRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyMARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$366,000Education$177,000Health$175,000Food & Nutrition$135,000Employment$45,000Animals$42,500Philanthropy$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $175,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFairview Health Services: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHamilton County Harvest Food Bank Inc: $75,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetURBAN ROOTS MN: $65,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJANUS DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWEST ANIMAL RESCUE AND SERVICES: $40,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROMEDICA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThird Phase Christian Center: $10,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetFORCE-FACING OUR RISK OF CANCER EMPOWERED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMinnesota Children's Museum: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRCA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCANVAS HEALTH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST ANNE HOME: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION AND FRIENDS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Land O'Lakes Foundati…The Blackbaud Giving …Xcel Energy FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Mightycause Charitabl…Baird Foundation IncRaymond James Charita…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Morgan Stanley Global…
Land O'Lakes FoundationMN14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Land O'Lakes Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Xcel Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seremet Family Fdn-Rittenhouse funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seremet Family Fdn-Rittenhouse. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Force-Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered Inc: 15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Seremet Family Fdn-Rittenhouse?

Find your warmest path to Seremet Family Fdn-Rittenhouse through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Seremet Family Fdn-Rittenhouse’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home