Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Seremet Family Fdn-Rittenhouse

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$171k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$481kFood & Nutrition$205kEducation$127kRecreation & Sports$50kAnimals$43kHuman Services$36kReligion$30kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$747k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN REGENTS$25,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC$25,000
SECOND HELPINGS$15,000
JANUS DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC$15,000
HAMILTON COUNTY HARVEST FOOD BANK INC$15,000
RILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CANVAS HEALTH INC: $5k → 6%THIRD PHASE INC: $10k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
MI
IN
OH
PA
CA
MD
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$653k · 12 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$653k
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+41%

Still filing today

83%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionAnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    Fairview Health Services
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +13%
  • HC
    Hamilton County Harvest Food Bank Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +179%
  • UR
    URBAN ROOTS MN
    5× · 2018–2022 · $65k · revenue +326%

Funded once

  • FH
    FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +56%
  • TN
    TOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -28%
  • WC
    WAYZATA COMMUNITY CHURCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

4
Calvary Hospital Inc

The mission of calvary hospital is to care for the medical, emotional and spiritual needs of our adult patients with advanced cancer and other life-limiting illnesses. it is the only fully accredited acute care hospital in the u.s. devoted…

Health
5
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
6
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

7
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Northern Michigan Hematology and Oncology

Provide professional services for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and infectious disease and related conditions.

Health
9
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
10
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
12
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Food Pantries & AssistanceSubstance Abuse TreatmentPublic Library SupportAnimal Rescue and AdoptionFaith-Based Senior LivingCommunity Arts OrganizationsUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Cancer Support OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%41%35–55yr16%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%58%35–55yr16%31%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,536

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $175,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANURBAN ROOTS MN — $65,000 · OtherURBAN ROOTS MNMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC — $30,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE — $20,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THEWAYZATA COMMUNITY CHURCH FOUNDATION — $15,000 · OtherGEIST CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $15,000 · Other+8 more — $46,000 · Other+8 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $175,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre …+1 more — $2,000 · EducationFairview Health Services — $100,000 · HealthFairview Health Serv…COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC — $50,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH NET…FORCE-FACING OUR RISK OF CANCER EMPOWERED INC — $10,000 · HealthFORCE-FACING OUR RIS…+3 more — $15,000 · Health+3 moreHamilton County Harvest Food Bank Inc — $75,000 · Food & NutritionHamilton County…SECOND HELPINGS INC — $45,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HELPINGS…TOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK — $15,000 · Food & NutritionTOLEDO NORTHWES…JANUS DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES — $45,000 · EmploymentMIDWEST ANIMAL RESCUE AND SERVICES — $40,000 · AnimalsTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $2,500 · AnimalsFRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyMARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$366,000Education$177,000Health$175,000Food & Nutrition$135,000Employment$45,000Animals$42,500Philanthropy$36,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $175,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFairview Health Services — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHamilton County Harvest Food Bank Inc — $75,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetURBAN ROOTS MN — $65,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJANUS DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES — $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWEST ANIMAL RESCUE AND SERVICES — $40,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFORCE-FACING OUR RISK OF CANCER EMPOWERED INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROMEDICA FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThird Phase Christian Center — $10,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetMARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST ANNE HOME — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRCA FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetMinnesota Children's Museum — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANVAS HEALTH INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION AND FRIENDS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Land O'Lakes FoundationMN14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Land O'Lakes Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Xcel Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Seremet Family Fdn-Rittenhouse funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 15%
  • Force-Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered Inc15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Seremet Family Fdn-Rittenhouse?

Find your warmest path to Seremet Family Fdn-Rittenhouse through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph