Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Seiu Healthcare Illinois & Indiana

Improve the conditions, and benefit the general welfare, of its members by every means, including securing economic advantages, including better wages, hours, and working conditions, through organization, collective bargaining, legislative and political action and the utilization of other lawful means.

$625k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Civil Rights$957kPublic Benefit$796kEducation$578kHousing & Shelter$286kEmployment$215kHuman Services$201kHealth$185kFood & Nutrition$58kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 12 grants below total $462,200 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $624,654 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $162,454 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $112k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $335k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TECHNICOLOR POLITICAL LLC$200,000
GRASSROOTS ILLINOIS ACTION$135,000
MISSOURIANS FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES & FAIR$27,000
ILLINOIS ACTION FOR CHILDREN$20,000
ILLINOIS ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS$15,000
ACCESS LIVING$10,000
IL LEGISLATIVE LATINO CAUCUS FOUNDATION$10,000
WOMEN EMPLOYED$10,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$10,000
KENWOOD OAKLAND COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION$10,000
ICIRR$9,200
H-CAP INC$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%GEORGIA INVESTOR ACTION FUND INC: $75k → 14%JANE ADDAMS SENIOR CAUCUS: $11k → 14%JANE ADDAMS SENIOR CAUCUS: $5k → 14%JANE ADDAMS SENIOR CAUCUS: $5k → 14%HEALTHY HOOD CHICAGO: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
MA
IN
PA
MO
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 21 repeat orgs$963k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +115% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
34

Total granted

$2.4M
$763k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+115%
+14%

Still filing today

81%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsEmploymentEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    Grassroots Illinois Action
    6× · 2017–2024 · $541k · revenue +127% · 81% of their budget
  • GC
    Grassroots Collaborative
    6× · 2017–2023 · $526k · revenue +115%
  • CC
    CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS
    3× · 2017–2023 · $236k · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • JF
    JUSTICE FOR ALL
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -9%
  • SE
    SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL NO 73
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue +15%
  • GI
    Georgia Investor Action Fund Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue -14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
2
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
3
Chicago Votes

Chicago Votes is a non-partisan, non-profit organization building a more inclusive democracy by putting power in the hands of young Chicagoans. We're engaging and developing a new generation of leaders by opening the doors of government,…

Civil Rights
4
Citizen Action Illinois Education Fund

Public education on current public policy issues

Public Benefit
5
Illinois Unidos

Champion equitable responses and recovery efforts for the Latinx community impacted by COVID-19

Community Improvement
6
United Way of Illinois

Strengthen United Way movement in Illinois

Philanthropy
7
Chicago Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Inc

Secure racial equity and economic opportunity for all

Crime & Legal
8
Change Illinois Action Fund

Change illinois action fund is dedicated to advocating for solutions to the issues that undermine democracy and government efficiency in illinois, including restricted ballot access, uncompetitive elections, decreased citizen…

—
9
Working Family Solidarity

Working Family Solidarity builds unity between low and moderate-income families of different backgrounds, especially African American and Latino, to struggle together for equitable development. We fight for racial equity and economic…

Employment
10
Change Illinois

Change illinois is dedicated to activities that promote honest and effective government, open elections, and high levels of voter participation in illinois.

Civil Rights
11
Chicago Workers' Collaborative Nfp

Chicago Workers' Collaborative's mission is to promote full employment and equality for the lowest wage-earners, primarily temporary staffing workers, in the Chicago region through leadership and skills training, critical assistance and…

Education
12
Illinios Workers in Action

Illinois Workers in Action IWA mission is to empower workers through education organizing policy solidarity worker power develop leadership in the workplace and offer resources to families and the community.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago and the most unlike its peers is Chicago Sun Times Charity Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%10%<5yr14%10%5–10yr17%10%10–20yr17%21%20–35yr15%28%35–55yr17%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%8%<5yr14%25%5–10yr17%27%10–20yr17%9%20–35yr15%22%35–55yr17%9%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
3/56
the rest of the field
15%
5,580/36,758

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/45
Grantees still filing
30/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Action Now — $305,000 · OtherAction NowTECHNICOLOR POLITICAL LLC — $200,000 · OtherTECHNICOLOR POLITICAL LLCILLINOIS ACTION FOR CHILDREN — $188,000 · OtherILLINOIS ACTION FOR CHILDRENAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago — $121,120 · OtherAccess Living of Metropolitan ChicagoSERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL NO 73 — $75,000 · OtherILLINOIS ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS — $65,000 · Other+32 more — $592,250 · Other+32 moreGrassroots Illinois Action — $541,000 · EmploymentGrassroots Illinois…+3 more — $42,000 · Employment+3 moreGrassroots Collaborative — $525,725 · EducationGrassroots Collabor…University of Illinois Foundation — $35,000 · EducationUniversity of Illin…+2 more — $16,000 · EducationIllinois Legislative Black Caucus Foundation — $126,000 · Civil RightsIllinois …JUSTICE FOR ALL — $100,000 · Civil RightsJUSTICE F…ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS — $42,700 · Civil RightsILLINOIS …MISSOURI ORGANIZING AND VOTER ENGAGEMENT ACTION — $15,000 · Civil RightsCitizen Action Illinois — $15,000 · Civil RightsCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS — $235,500 · Housing & ShelterGeorgia Investor Action Fund Inc — $75,000 · Human ServicesJane Addams Senior Caucus — $20,800 · Human ServicesHEALTHY HOOD CHICAGO — $9,000 · Human ServicesILLINOIS HUNGER COALITION — $57,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,546,370Employment$583,000Education$576,725Civil Rights$298,700Housing & Shelter$235,500Human Services$104,800Food & Nutrition$57,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGrassroots Illinois Action — $541,000 over 6y, 81% of budgetGrassroots Collaborative — $525,725 over 6y, 18% of budgetAction Now — $305,000 over 3y, 88% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS — $235,500 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetIllinois Legislative Black Caucus Foundation — $126,000 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago — $121,120 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetJUSTICE FOR ALL — $100,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetSERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL NO 73 — $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGeorgia Investor Action Fund Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetILLINOIS HUNGER COALITION — $57,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS — $42,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI AFL-CIO — $40,750 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS — $26,555 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMISSOURIANS FOR HEALTHCARE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOALITION OF LABOR UNION WOMEN — $22,885 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetJane Addams Senior Caucus — $20,800 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetKenwood Oakland Community Organization — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMidwest Academy — $16,880 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN EMPLOYED — $16,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetARISE CHICAGO — $15,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMISSOURI ORGANIZING AND VOTER ENGAGEMENT ACTION — $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCitizen Action Illinois — $15,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetHOOSIER ACTION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetBRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Federation of Labor Workforce and Community Initiative — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetILLINOIS LEGISLATIVE LATINO CAUCUS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetSEIU Healthcare Michigan — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEIU HEALTHCARE PA TRAINING & EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY HOOD CHICAGO — $9,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTHSIDERS ORGANIZED FOR UNITY AND LIBERATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHICAGO SUN TIMES CHARITY TRUST — $7,500 over 1y, 61% of budgetA PHILIP RANDOLPH PULLMAN PORTER MUSEUM — $7,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $6,680 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican International College — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Votes Action Fund — $5,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSHRIVER CENTER ON POVERTY LAW — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS FUND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

All Hands on Deck Net…Chicago Instructional…Woods Fund of ChicagoPolk Bros Foundation …Tides FoundationThe Chicago Community…Field Foundation of I…United Way of Metropo…Crossroads Fund IncChicago Foundation fo…Wieboldt FoundationConant Family Foundat…
All Hands on Deck Network IncMA25.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Chicago Instructional Technology Foundation Inc · Woods Fund of Chicago · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Field Foundation of Illinois · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Crossroads Fund Inc · Chicago Foundation for Women · Wieboldt Foundation · Conant Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Seiu Healthcare Illinois & Indiana funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • American International College — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines