Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sebastian Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$617k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$1.2MEducation$1.2MHealth$431kHuman Services$261kInternational$260kEmployment$160kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kCivil Rights$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $245k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $355k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIOCESE OF JOLIET PARISH$100,000
DIOCESE OF JOLIET PARISH$100,000
NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL$55,000
CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$50,000
GREENWOOD PROJECT$50,000
BENET ACADEMY$45,000
MONTINI CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$30,000
SAINT BENEDICTINE SOCIETY$30,000
ANNUNCIATION BYZANTINE CATHOLIC CHURCH$25,000
ST ISAAC JOGUES CHURCH$25,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHWESTERN OHIO$25,000
CATHOLIC SHRINE OF MARIAPOCH$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
BLOOD CANCER UNITED OHIO RIVER VALLEY REGION$10,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $450k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Misericordia Home: $25k → 14%Misericordia Home: $25k → 14%Misericordia Home: $25k → 14%Misericordia Home: $25k → 14%Misericordia Home: $25k → 14%Misericordia Home: $25k → 14%Guadalupe Center: $10k → 10%Guadalupe Center: $10k → 10%Guadalupe Center: $10k → 10%Guadalupe Center: $10k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHWESTERN OHIO: $25k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHWESTERN OHIO: $5k → 16%GREENWOOD PROJECT: $50k → 14%Greenwood Project: $30k → 14%YMCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $10k → 16%Greenwood Project: $30k → 14%YMCA of Greater Cincinnati: $10k → 16%Greenwood Project: $30k → 14%Greenwood Project: $30k → 14%Greenwood Project: $25k → 14%Greenwood Project: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MN
IL
WI
NY
SD
OH
PA
CT
CO
MO
KS
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Sebastian Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 56% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 43%.

Sebastian Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 53 repeat orgs$540k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

53 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 46 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
13

Total granted

$3.7M
$139k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+13%

Still filing today

23%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $402k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthEducationCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GREENWOOD PROJECT
    7× · 2019–2025 · $210k · revenue ×15
  • MH
    MISERICORDIA HOME
    6× · 2019–2024 · $150k · revenue +60%
  • DM
    DISMAS MINISTRY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $110k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • SM
    St Mary Gostyn Catholic Church
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • UO
    University of Cincinnati Center
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
7
Cancer Research Institute Inc

See schedule ocri is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing cancer immunotherapy through scientific discovery and global collaboration. since 1953, cri has funded research that deepens understanding of the immune system and its…

Health
8
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
9
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
10
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
11
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is New Wave Feminists. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Diocese of Joliet: $405,000 · OtherDiocese of JolietSt Isaac Jogues Catholic Church: $336,500 · OtherSt Isaac Jogues Catholic ChurchDIOCESE OF JOLIET PARISH: $200,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF JOLIET PARISHNotre Dame Jr Sr High School: $190,000 · OtherCINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $173,000 · OtherSt Isaac Jogues Cath Church: $150,000 · OtherDiocese of Joliet in Illinois: $150,000 · OtherSt John the Evangelist Catholic Chu: $120,000 · Other+56 more: $1,839,300 · Other+56 moreGREENWOOD PROJECT: $210,000 · Human ServicesGREENWOOD P…MISERICORDIA HOME: $150,000 · Human ServicesMISERICORDI…Guadalupe Center Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesGuadalupe C…Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio: $30,050 · Human ServicesCatholic Ch…YWCA of Greater Cincinnati: $20,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $110,000 · InternationalHOPE FOR HAITI INC: $30,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · InternationalRETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC: $25,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $21,000 · HealthNew Wave Feminists: $25,000 · Civil RightsJC7 FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyVanderbilt University: $8,500 · EducationYOUNG LIFE: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,563,800Human Services$450,050International$155,000Health$46,000Civil Rights$25,000Philanthropy$20,000Education$8,500Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREENWOOD PROJECT: $210,000 over 7y, 8.9% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDISMAS MINISTRY INC: $110,000 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $110,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities Southwestern Ohio: $30,050 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE FOR HAITI INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNew Wave Feminists: $25,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJC7 FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetYWCA of Greater Cincinnati: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREENWOOD PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
  • Who funds DISMAS MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds RETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds New Wave Feminists ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sebastian Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sebastian Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Hope for Haiti Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sebastian Family Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sebastian Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sebastian Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph