Skip to content

· Private foundation

Seawood Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$185kReligion$31kArts & Culture$29kFood & Nutrition$27kInternational$21kEnvironment$19kPhilanthropy$13kHuman Services$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$539k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOREVER YOUNG AL CAMPBELL INC$26,025
FIRST UNITAREIAN CHURCH$7,271
MONTEREY BAY NATIONAL MARINE SANCTU$6,000
OPERA SAN JOSE$2,685
SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE$2,000
KQED$2,000
SJSU TOWER FOUNDATION$1,000
FINCA INTERNATIONAL$1,000
HEALTH TRUST$1,000
RECOVERY CAFE$1,000
SYMPHONY SAN JOSE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
ATRIA SENIOR LIVING FUND$500
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$500
SECOND HARVEST SILICON VALLEY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $2k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OR
CA
VA
AZ
AR
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$230k · 27 repeat orgs$124k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
27

Total granted

$230k
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
0%

Still filing today

48%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesInternationalPublic BenefitFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FI
    FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +157%
  • OS
    OPERA SAN JOSE INCORPORATED
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +62%
  • KI
    KQED INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • FY
    FOREVER YOUNG
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
  • VA
    VISITING ANGELS
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
4
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
5
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
6
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
7
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
8
Food and Environment Reporting Network Inc

Fern seeks to make the food system more sustainable and equitable through powerful journalism and storytelling.

Food & Nutrition
9
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
10
Silent Spring Institute Inc

Silent spring institute is dedicated to advancing science on the influence of environmental chemicals on women's health, with a focus on breast cancer prevention.

Health
11
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
12
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Health Trust; the most unlike its peers is Italian Community Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $39,880 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOREVER YOUNG: $34,600 · OtherFOREVER YOUNGIndividual grant recipient: $33,094 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOREVER YOUNG AL CAMPBELL INC: $26,025 · OtherFOREVER YOUNG AL CAMPBELL INCSECOND HARVEST: $18,250 · OtherSECOND HARVESTFIRST UNITAREIAN CHURCH: $16,271 · OtherFIRST UNITAREIAN CHURCHFIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH: $13,600 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION MONTERY COUNTY: $13,125 · OtherC3 CARE: $11,791 · OtherVISITING ANGELS: $11,013 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+38 more: $69,958 · Other+38 moreFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $21,000 · InternationalOPERA SAN JOSE INCORPORATED: $9,120 · Arts & CultureKQED INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSYMPHONY SAN JOSE: $3,000 · Arts & CultureItalian American Heritage Foundation Inc: $2,915 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $650 · Arts & CultureTHE HEALTH TRUST: $7,000 · HealthNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOLARS INC: $3,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $250 · EducationSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $3,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesCONSUMER REPORTS INC: $800 · Public Benefit
Other$297,607International$21,000Arts & Culture$20,685Health$7,000Education$3,250Human Services$3,100Public Benefit$800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOPERA SAN JOSE INCORPORATED: $9,120 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEALTH TRUST: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOLARS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSYMPHONY SAN JOSE: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetItalian American Heritage Foundation Inc: $2,915 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetITALIAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONSUMER REPORTS INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN BEETHOVEN SOCIETY CO SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY: $400 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetELDERHOSTEL INC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF AMERICAN POETS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $115 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERA SAN JOSE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE HEALTH TRUST ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOLARS INC ↗
  • Who funds SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds SYMPHONY SAN JOSE ↗
  • Who funds Italian American Heritage Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds ITALIAN COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seawood Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seawood Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Seawood’s filings →

    More from the funding graph