Loading…
Loading…
California · Nonprofit
SYMPHONY SAN JOSE (California) is funded by 25 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,965,338 in grants to it, the largest being SAN JOSE SYMPHONY FOUNDATION ($343,700). 18 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
SYMPHONY SAN JOSE runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 737 arts & culture nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 737 arts & culture nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2025 4%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
54% of SYMPHONY SAN JOSE’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
$78k from 2 funders in 2025, up from $147k and 6 in 2017.
8 of 25 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 38% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of SYMPHONY SAN JOSE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
SYMPHONY SAN JOSE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 17% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 34% · 2018 45% · 2019 27% · 2020 26% · 2021 20% · 2022 36% · 2023 22% · 2024 30% · 2025 65% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
48% of SYMPHONY SAN JOSE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 72% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
SYMPHONY SAN JOSE is locally rooted: 70% of its grant income comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 25 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
84% of spending goes to programs.
94%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 25funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing