· Public charity
Seachange Capital Partners Inc
Seachange supports nonprofits facing complex financial and organizationalchallenges.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 47 grants below total $1,347,942 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,394,344 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $46,402 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k36 grants · $824k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $480k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NYPRI | $225,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $80,000 |
| Ursuline University | $75,000 |
| Lackawanna College | $50,000 |
| Peirce College | $50,000 |
| Self Help Community Services | $40,000 |
| Seach for Commonground | $40,000 |
| Kansas Wesleyan University | $38,982 |
| Cultural Vistas | $37,500 |
| College Possible | $35,000 |
| Philadelphia Education Fund | $35,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $35,000 |
| Thrive for Life Prison Projec | $35,000 |
| Fort Hays State University | $34,939 |
| The Art Effect of Hudson Vall | $32,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $463k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 43 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTHCARE NETWORK2× · 2019–2024 · $80k · revenue +0%
- TPTHE PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION FUND2× · 2020–2024 · $65k · revenue +21%
- LILEAP INC2× · 2018–2024 · $29k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $296k
- WCWILBERFORCE - CENTRAL STATE Uone grant, 2022 · $100k
- TCTrocaire College - Medaille Uone grant, 2022 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Selfhelp Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Yoga 4 the World. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 159 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RISING GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds COMMONPOINT NY INC ↗
- Who funds THE PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds MOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BOARDSOURCE ↗
- Who funds LACKAWANNA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds PEIRCE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds BAILEY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BETANCES HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND ↗
- Who funds SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HOPEPHL ↗
- Who funds KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CULTURAL VISTAS INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds DAY SPRING INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Td Charitable Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Independence Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Seachange Capital Partners Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Arc Eastern Connecticut Inc — 88% of income from government
- Acenda Inc Dba Acenda Integrated Health — 69% of income from government
- Young Audiences of Oregon Inc — 23% of income from government
- Gather New Haven Inc (Formely New Haven Land Trust Inc) — 11% of income from government
- Public Justice Center Inc — 5% of income from government
- Evernorth Loan Fund Inc — 3% of income from government
- Bennington College Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.