Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Scott & White Memorial Hospital

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

$3.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$71MEducation$2.9MFood & Nutrition$85kHuman Services$81kYouth Development$62kArts & Culture$25kPhilanthropy$21kReligion$6kOther$718k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $269k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.9M
$69,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Scott & White Continuing Care Hospital$1,826,110
Baylor Research Institute$1,076,635
Bell County$200,000
Temple Community Clinic$69,250
Greater Killeen Community Clinic$27,500
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Temple Texas$10,500
Belton Senior Activity Center$8,000
American Heart Association$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Helping Hands Ministry of Belton: $13k → 14%Helping Hands Ministry of Belton: $13k → 14%Belton Senior Activity Center: $11k → 14%Belton Senior Activity Center: $11k → 14%Helping Hands Ministry of Belton Inc: $10k → 14%Belton Senior Activity Center: $9k → 14%Belton Senior Activity Center: $8k → 14%Helping Hands Ministry of Belton Inc: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$72M · 16 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$72M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+8%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $211k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SW
    Scott & White Continuing Care Hospital
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40M · revenue +24% · 46% of their budget
  • BR
    Baylor Research Institute
    7× · 2019–2025 · $8.9M · revenue +29%
  • Scott & White Healthcare Foundation
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7.0M · revenue +64% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    one grant, 2024 · $2.5M · revenue +8%
  • AK
    AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC
    one grant, 2018 · $33k · revenue +8%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $21k · revenue -9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scott & White Memorial Hospital

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
2
Scott & White Clinic

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
3
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
5
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
6
Baylor Health Care System Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health, to encourage broad-based public support of the health care system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
7
Scott & White Hospital-Taylor

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers- Capitol Area

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Centennial

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Scott & White Hospital-Marble Falls

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scott & White Healthcare Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Baylor Research Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHospital Physician NetworksHomeless Services & Basic N…Education FoundationsIndependent SchoolsDallas Arts & Culture Organ…Faith-Based Hospital Systems
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr18%20%10–20yr15%10%20–35yr12%30%35–55yr13%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr18%83%10–20yr15%1%20–35yr12%12%35–55yr13%4%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
16%
3,894/24,479

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Scott & White Continuing Care Hospital — $39,712,206 · HealthScott & White Continuing Care HospitalScott & White EMS Inc — $14,800,000 · HealthScott & White EMS IncBaylor Research Institute — $8,889,194 · HealthBaylor Research InstituteScott & White Healthcare Foundation — $6,983,712 · HealthScott & White Healthcare Foundation+4 more — $664,550 · HealthBaylor College of Medicine — $2,500,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR — $320,000 · Education+2 more — $30,000 · EducationTemple College — $413,000 · OtherBELL COUNTY TX — $200,000 · OtherCITY OF TEMPLE — $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC — $33,245 · Other+4 more — $48,650 · OtherCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $85,000 · Food & NutritionHELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC — $42,500 · Human ServicesBelton Area Citizens for Seniors — $38,500 · Human ServicesRALPH WILSON YOUTH CLUBS OF TEMPLE INC — $56,066 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $5,500 · Youth DevelopmentCULTURAL ACTIVITIES CENTER INC — $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$71,049,662Education$2,850,000Other$744,895Food & Nutrition$85,000Human Services$81,000Youth Development$61,566Arts & Culture$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetScott & White Continuing Care Hospital — $39,712,206 over 9y, 46% of budgetScott & White EMS Inc — $14,800,000 over 6y, 77% of budgetBaylor Research Institute — $8,889,194 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetScott & White Healthcare Foundation — $6,983,712 over 2y, 26% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $2,500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER KILLEEN FREE CLINIC INC — $349,300 over 9y, 9.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR — $320,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTEMPLE COMMUNITY CLINIC — $159,250 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $89,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $85,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $66,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRALPH WILSON YOUTH CLUBS OF TEMPLE INC — $56,066 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetHELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC — $42,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetBelton Area Citizens for Seniors — $38,500 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC — $33,245 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCULTURAL ACTIVITIES CENTER INC — $25,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC — $20,950 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEMPLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $11,200 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTEMPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCHURCHES TOUCHING LIVES FOR CHRIST — $6,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

E Rhodes and Leona B …The Frank W & Sue May…Scott & White Healthc…United Way of Central…Garlyn & Lajuan Shelt…Texas Instruments Fou…The Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
E Rhodes and Leona B Carpenter FoundationPA19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: E Rhodes and Leona B Carpenter Foundation · The Frank W & Sue Mayborn Foundation · Scott & White Healthcare Foundation · United Way of Central Texas Inc · Garlyn & Lajuan Shelton Christian Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Scott & White Memorial Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines