· Public charity
United Way of Central Texas Inc
To provide support, both managerial and financial, to human service programs of the central texas area.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $492,656 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $716,256 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $223,600 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $235k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEMPLE COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC | $80,000 |
| RALPH WILSON YOUTH CLUBS OF TEMPLE INC | $60,100 |
| CENTRAL TEXAS 4-C INC | $55,000 |
| CENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES | $54,556 |
| FAMILIES IN CRISIS INC | $45,000 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS BELL-CORYELL COUNTIES INC | $40,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE EAST BELL CO | $40,000 |
| HELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC | $35,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $30,000 |
| CHURCHES TOUCHING LIVES FOR CHRIST | $20,000 |
| STARRY INC | $15,000 |
| HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY ACTION | $10,000 |
| TEMPLE HOUSING RESIDENTIAL CORPORATION | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $868k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTEMPLE COMMUNITY CLINIC8× · 2017–2024 · $625k · revenue +129%
- RWRALPH WILSON YOUTH CLUBS OF TEMPLE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $547k · revenue +76%
- CTCENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU8× · 2017–2024 · $405k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- FMFEED MY SHEEP - TEMPLEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue +115%
- PKPEACEABLE KINGDOM RETREAT FOR CHILDRENone grant, 2017 · $23k
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.
To provide shelter to abused families.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling
To provide the highest quality of appropriate investigative, assessment, and ongoing thrapeutic treatment services for abused chilren and their families throught the four county service area (victoria, jackson, goliad, and dewitt).
Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.
Crisis pregnancy counseling.
The Lullaby House missionis ot strengthen families by providing programs and services to teenage parents and familites in need which will inspire and promote generational change.
To bring hope and healing while working together to break the cycle of child abuse.
to reach functional zero homelessness in Hays County through outreach case management direct aid and emergency response while maintaining the dignity of the people we serve
To teach the Word, promote fellowship and educate youth for adulthood. To help individuals & families with food, housing and transportation needs. We also provide drug and addition counseling as well as marriage counseling.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foster Love Bell County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Our Lady of the Angels Maternity Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TEMPLE COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds RALPH WILSON YOUTH CLUBS OF TEMPLE INC ↗
- Who funds CEN-TEX ALCOHOLIC REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL TEXAS YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES IN CRISIS ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF BELL COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BELL COUNTY SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds BODY OF CHRIST COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds Fort Cavazos Community Habitat for Humanity Inc ↗
- Who funds CASA OF BELL AND CORYELL COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds OUR LADY OF THE ANGELS MATERNITY HOME INC ↗
- Who funds LONE STAR LEGAL AID ↗
- Who funds STARRY Inc ↗
- Who funds FEED MY SHEEP - TEMPLE ↗
- Who funds FOSTER LOVE BELL COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CHURCHES TOUCHING LIVES FOR CHRIST ↗
- Who funds TEMPLE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: E Rhodes and Leona B Carpenter Foundation · The Frank W & Sue Mayborn Foundation · Scott & White Healthcare Foundation · Rock Rose Foundation Inc · Bell Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Tri-County Area · Garlyn & Lajuan Shelton Christian Foundation · Cadence Bank Foundation · Rotary International Temple Rotary Club · Scott & White Memorial Hospital · BBVA Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Central Texas Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.