Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Scott & White Healthcare Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH), to encourage broad-based public support of the healthcare system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including patient care, research, and educational and training programs.

$18M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$211MHuman Services$303kPhilanthropy$240kEmployment$212kFood & Nutrition$118kCommunity Improvement$50kReligion$43kHousing & Shelter$42kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $238k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $439k
  • $250k+7 grants · $17M
$45,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$192M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Scott & White Hospital Round Rock$7,059,646
Baylor Scott & White Memorial Hospital$5,141,417
Baylor Research Institute$1,966,534
Baylor Scott & White Health$1,190,699
Scott & White Clinic$891,181
Scott & White Hospital-Marble Falls$331,585
Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center$310,419
United Way of Central Texas Inc$118,700
Heart of Texas Goodwill Industries Inc$106,200
Unity Partners dba Project Unity$106,200
Scott & White Hospital-College Station$57,686
Hill Country Community Action Association Inc$50,000
Catholic Charities of Central Texas$45,000
Baylor University Medical Center$30,686
Hope Pregnancy Center Inc$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $276k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Highland Lakes Pregnancy Resource Center: $8k → 13%Helping Hands Ministy of Belton Inc: $20k → 14%Unity Partners dba Project Unity: $106k → 22%Texas Healthy at Home: $13k → 11%Helping Hands of Belton Inc: $20k → 14%Economic Opportunities Advancement Corporation: $30k → 16%Unity Partners dba Project Unity: $80k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$212M · 24 repeat orgs$401k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
11

Total granted

$212M
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
0%

Still filing today

100%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $182k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyReligionEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SW
    Scott & White Memorial Hospital
    9× · 2017–2025 · $115M · revenue +63%
  • HB
    Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22M · revenue +100%
  • SW
    Scott & White Clinic
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22M · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • HP
    HOPE PREGNANCY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $31k · revenue +6%
  • EO
    ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ADVANCEMENT CORP OF PLANNING REGION XI
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%
  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
2
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
3
Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
5
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Centennial

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
6
Baylor Health Care System

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
Lake Pointe Operating Company Llc

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Baylor Regional Medical Center at Grapevine

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
10
Baylor Scott & White Holdings

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Scott & White Healthcare

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Philanthropy
12
Scott & White Ems Inc

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Stay in the Fight Veterans Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%0%<5yr16%8%5–10yr18%22%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr13%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr18%11%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr11%6%35–55yr13%65%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
2/43
the rest of the field
16%
5,574/35,087

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
27/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Scott & White Memorial Hospital — $115,449,648 · HealthScott & White Memorial HospitalHillcrest Baptist Medical Center — $21,804,532 · HealthHillcrest Baptist Medical CenterScott & White Clinic — $21,790,493 · HealthScott & White ClinicScott & White Hospital Round Rock — $17,294,533 · HealthScott & White Hospital Round RockBaylor Research Institute — $10,548,564 · HealthBaylor Scott & White Health — $9,034,652 · Health+17 more — $15,421,192 · Health+17 moreUnity Partners — $185,850 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ADVANCEMENT CORP OF PLANNING REGION XI — $30,000 · Human ServicesTexas Healthy at Home — $12,500 · Human Services+1 more — $7,500 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC — $224,900 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of the Brazos Valley — $15,000 · PhilanthropyHEART OF TEXAS GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC — $212,400 · EmploymentCatholic Charities of Central Texas — $45,000 · OtherHope Pregnancy Center Inc — $30,000 · OtherSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN — $20,000 · OtherDriving Hope of Texas — $10,000 · OtherCactus Nazarene Ministry Center — $30,000 · OtherCHURCHES TOUCHING LIVES FOR CHRIST — $12,500 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF BELL COUNTY INC — $42,000 · OtherStay in the Fight Veterans Foundation — $10,000 · OtherSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC — $40,000 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $20,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY — $18,000 · Food & NutritionHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 · Community Improvement
Health$211,343,614Human Services$275,850Philanthropy$239,900Employment$212,400Other$199,500Food & Nutrition$78,000Community Improvement$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetScott & White Memorial Hospital — $115,449,648 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetHillcrest Baptist Medical Center — $21,804,532 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetScott & White Clinic — $21,790,493 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetScott & White Hospital Round Rock — $17,294,533 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetBaylor Research Institute — $10,548,564 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetBaylor Scott & White Health — $9,034,652 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetScott & White Hospital-Marble Falls — $6,692,886 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetScott & White Hospital-College Station — $6,216,921 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetScott & White Hospital Brenham — $1,074,030 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetMID COAST MEDICAL CENTER - CENTRAL — $495,110 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetScott & White Hospital-Taylor — $450,910 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC — $224,900 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetHEART OF TEXAS GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC — $212,400 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUnity Partners — $185,850 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBaylor University Medical Center — $154,419 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHillcrest Physician Services — $55,343 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBaylor Scott & White Medical Centers- Capitol Area — $51,676 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSES FOR HEALING INC — $50,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetHillcrest Family Health Center — $48,717 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities of Central Texas — $45,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF BELL COUNTY INC — $42,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHOPE PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $30,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ADVANCEMENT CORP OF PLANNING REGION XI — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCactus Nazarene Ministry Center — $30,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetScott & White Continuing Care Hospital — $20,971 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY — $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of the Brazos Valley — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTEMPLE COMMUNITY CLINIC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTexas Healthy at Home — $12,500 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetStay in the Fight Veterans Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetBaylor Medical Center at Irving — $7,709 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLAND LAKES PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER — $7,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Central…Garlyn & Lajuan Shelt…Scott & White Memoria…E Rhodes and Leona B …The Frank W & Sue May…BBVA FoundationEdward Jones Foundati…Renaissance Charitabl…The Blackbaud Giving …Raymond James Charita…Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…
United Way of Central Texas IncTX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Central Texas Inc · Garlyn & Lajuan Shelton Christian Foundation · Scott & White Memorial Hospital · E Rhodes and Leona B Carpenter Foundation · The Frank W & Sue Mayborn Foundation · BBVA Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Scott & White Healthcare Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines