Skip to content
Scott & White Memorial Hospital at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Scott & White Memorial Hospital

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

$3.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$74MEducation$763kPublic Benefit$200kFood & Nutrition$103kHuman Services$64kYouth Development$62kRecreation & Sports$50kArts & Culture$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $269k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.9M
$69,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Scott & White Continuing Care Hospital$1,826,110
Baylor Research Institute$1,076,635
Bell County$200,000
Temple Community Clinic$69,250
Greater Killeen Community Clinic$27,500
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Temple Texas$10,500
Belton Senior Activity Center$8,000
American Heart Association$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Helping Hands Ministry of Belton: $13k → 14%Helping Hands Ministry of Belton: $13k → 14%Belton Senior Activity Center: $11k → 14%Belton Senior Activity Center: $11k → 14%Helping Hands Ministry of Belton Inc: $10k → 14%Belton Senior Activity Center: $9k → 14%Helping Hands Ministry of Belton Inc: $8k → 14%Belton Senior Activity Center: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$72M · 16 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$72M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+22%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $211k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SW
    Scott & White Continuing Care Hospital
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40M · revenue +24% · 46% of their budget
  • BR
    Baylor Research Institute
    7× · 2019–2025 · $8.9M · revenue +29%
  • Scott & White Healthcare Foundation
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7.0M · revenue +64% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    one grant, 2024 · $2.5M · revenue +8%
  • AK
    AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC
    one grant, 2018 · $33k · revenue +8%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $21k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scott & White Memorial Hospital

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
2
Scott & White Clinic

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
3
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
5
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
6
Baylor Health Care System Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health, to encourage broad-based public support of the health care system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
7
Scott & White Hospital-Taylor

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers- Capitol Area

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Centennial

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Scott & White Hospital-Marble Falls

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scott & White Healthcare Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Baylor Research Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Scott & White Continuing Care Hospital: $39,712,206 · HealthScott & White Continuing Care HospitalScott & White EMS Inc: $14,800,000 · HealthScott & White EMS IncBaylor Research Institute: $8,889,194 · HealthBaylor Research InstituteScott & White Healthcare Foundation: $6,983,712 · HealthScott & White Healthcare Foundation+4 more: $664,550 · HealthBaylor College of Medicine: $2,500,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $320,000 · Education+2 more: $30,000 · EducationTemple College: $413,000 · OtherBELL COUNTY TX: $200,000 · OtherCITY OF TEMPLE: $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $33,245 · Other+4 more: $48,650 · OtherCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $85,000 · Food & NutritionHELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC: $42,500 · Human ServicesBelton Area Citizens for Seniors: $38,500 · Human ServicesRALPH WILSON YOUTH CLUBS OF TEMPLE INC: $56,066 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $5,500 · Youth DevelopmentCULTURAL ACTIVITIES CENTER INC: $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$71,049,662Education$2,850,000Other$744,895Food & Nutrition$85,000Human Services$81,000Youth Development$61,566Arts & Culture$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetScott & White Continuing Care Hospital: $39,712,206 over 9y, 46% of budgetScott & White EMS Inc: $14,800,000 over 6y, 77% of budgetBaylor Research Institute: $8,889,194 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetScott & White Healthcare Foundation: $6,983,712 over 2y, 26% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $2,500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER KILLEEN FREE CLINIC INC: $349,300 over 9y, 9.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $320,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTEMPLE COMMUNITY CLINIC: $159,250 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $89,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $85,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $66,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRALPH WILSON YOUTH CLUBS OF TEMPLE INC: $56,066 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetHELPING HANDS MINISTRY OF BELTON INC: $42,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetBelton Area Citizens for Seniors: $38,500 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $33,245 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCULTURAL ACTIVITIES CENTER INC: $25,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $20,950 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEMPLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $11,200 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTEMPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCHURCHES TOUCHING LIVES FOR CHRIST: $6,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

E Rhodes and Leona B …The Frank W & Sue May…Scott & White Healthc…United Way of Central…Garlyn & Lajuan Shelt…Texas Instruments Fou…The Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
E Rhodes and Leona B Carpenter FoundationPA19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: E Rhodes and Leona B Carpenter Foundation · The Frank W & Sue Mayborn Foundation · Scott & White Healthcare Foundation · United Way of Central Texas Inc · Garlyn & Lajuan Shelton Christian Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scott & White Memorial Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scott & White Memorial Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Scott & White Memorial Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home