Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Scone Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$93kEducation$72kHealth$12kPublic Benefit$7kReligion$4kYouth Development$4kRecreation & Sports$4kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$526k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUNY ONEONTA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$50,000
THE CALDER FOUNDATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN REGENTS$12,000
CLOSE ENCOUNTERS WITH MUSIC$8,000
MAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$6,000
PS 21 CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY PERFORMANCE$5,500
HARMONY PROJECT HUDSON$4,000
GREAT BARRINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY$3,000
RESIDENCY UNLIMITED$3,000
NYU DRAMA REVIEW FUND$3,000
THE GLOSTER ART PROJECT$3,000
THE PUBLIC CONCERN FOUNDATION$2,500
EARTH JUSTICE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
YOUNG ISRAEL OF NORTH WOODMERE$900
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $25 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Scone Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 78% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Scone Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$64k · 10 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
20

Total granted

$64k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+17%

Still filing today

70%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    CLOSE ENCOUNTERS WITH MUSIC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +101%
  • MAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $14k · revenue +5%
  • PC
    PUBLIC CONCERN FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • MC
    MAGNUM CULTURAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%
  • P2
    PS 21 CHATHAM
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +55%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bang On a Can

Presenting, commissioning, performing, recording and teaching contemporary music. bang on a can believes in exposing exciting new music as broadly and accessibly as possible. through it's summer institute, bang on a can hopes to bring this…

Arts & Culture
2
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
3
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
4
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
5
Robert Rauschenberg Foundation
Arts & Culture
6
Wmht Educational Telecommunications Inc

Wmht enriches communities and elevates diverse perspectives by providing content, connection, and conversation that advance education, culture, and civic engagement.

7
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
8
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
9
Bard College

Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.

Education
10
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
11
Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts

Deeply rooted in our local beverly hills community and influenced by cultural change, the wallis annenberg center for the performing arts, a public-private partnership with the city of beverly hills, strives to be a site for the…

Arts & Culture
12
New York Public Radio

To make the mind more curious, the heart more open, and the spirit more joyful through excellent audio programming that is deeply rooted in new york.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harmony Project Hudson Inc and the most unlike its peers is Calder Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr21%22%10–20yr20%15%20–35yr12%33%35–55yr13%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr21%29%10–20yr20%22%20–35yr12%29%35–55yr13%17%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/28
the rest of the field
11%
4,560/41,958

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SUNY ONEONTA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherSUNY ONEONTA RESEARCH FOUNDATIONCALDER FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherCALDER FOUNDATIONREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $12,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANPS 21 CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY PERFORMANCE — $5,500 · OtherPS 21 CHATHAM — $5,175 · Other+12 more — $19,411 · Other+12 moreMAGNUM CULTURAL FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Arts & CultureMAGNUM CULTURAL FOUNDATIONCLOSE ENCOUNTERS WITH MUSIC — $18,000 · Arts & CultureCLOSE ENCOUNTERS WITH MUSICMAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $13,500 · Arts & CultureMAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INCGLOSTER ARTS PROJECT — $6,600 · Arts & CultureGLOSTER ARTS PROJECTHARMONY PROJECT HUDSON INC — $4,000 · Arts & CultureRESIDENCY UNLIMITED INC — $4,000 · Arts & CulturePS 21 INC — $3,500 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $2,550 · Arts & CultureTHE WINDWARD SCHOOL — $6,500 · EducationAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC — $5,000 · EducationROELIFF JANSEN COMMUNITY LIBRARY — $2,150 · EducationSTUDENT ADVOCACY INC — $500 · Education+2 more — $500 · EducationPUBLIC CONCERN FOUNDATION INC — $6,865 · Community ImprovementCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $3,500 · Recreation & SportsEARTHJUSTICE — $2,000 · EnvironmentCOLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentTHE SYLVIA CENTER — $1,000 · Food & NutritionHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $25 · Human Services
Other$117,086Arts & Culture$82,150Education$14,650Community Improvement$6,865Recreation & Sports$3,500Environment$3,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Human Services$25

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAGNUM CULTURAL FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCLOSE ENCOUNTERS WITH MUSIC — $18,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetMAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $13,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPUBLIC CONCERN FOUNDATION INC — $6,865 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGLOSTER ARTS PROJECT — $6,600 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetTHE WINDWARD SCHOOL — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARMONY PROJECT HUDSON INC — $4,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetRESIDENCY UNLIMITED INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPS 21 INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetROELIFF JANSEN COMMUNITY LIBRARY — $2,150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SYLVIA CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTUDENT ADVOCACY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFARM ON FOUNDATION INC — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LUDWIG FOUNDATION OF CUBA — $350 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMAC-HAYDN THEATRE INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARRINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation IncMA19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Hrbt Foundation · T Backer Fund Inc · The Alexander and Marjorie Hover Foundation · Bank of Greene County Charitable Foundation · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Eutopia Foundation · Prospect Hill Foundation Inc · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Scone Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Mahaiwe Performing Arts Center Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Scone Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Scone Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph