· Private foundation
Schwan's Corporate Giving Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $82k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $416k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FEEDING AMERICA | $155,000 |
| SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA | $105,622 |
| SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERISTY | $105,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION MCNAMARA ALUMNI CENTER | $50,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA | $32,445 |
| BOLDER OPTIONS | $25,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA | $24,310 |
| UNITED WAY OF SHELBY COUNTY | $8,261 |
| CHILD ADVOCACY & PARENTING SERVICES | $5,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND | $3,386 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA | $3,028 |
| THE IRONMAN FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY | $2,000 |
| THE IRONMAN FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $190k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Feeding America7× · 2019–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +77%- UOUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +111%
- SHSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND7× · 2019–2025 · $690k · revenue +91%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - WILL PROGRAMone grant, 2022 · $100k
- ACADAIR COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER INCone grant, 2020 · $42k · revenue -45% · 57% of their budget
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $35k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
End hunger together.
Engaging the community to end hunger
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
To eliminate hunger in south dakota.
Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o
The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Twin Cities United Way and the most unlike its peers is Adair County Resource Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds Youth Farm and Market Project ↗
- Who funds SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds Bolder Options ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SALINA EMERGENCY AIDFOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds ADAIR COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT ACADEMY OIC ↗
- Who funds MARSHALL AREA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY AND PARENTING SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds BESTPREP ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
- Who funds THE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds OCCK INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST INITIATIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT NORTH ↗
- Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Xcel Energy Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Otto Bremer Trust · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Communitygiving · Grotto Foundation Inc · The Hubbard Broadcasting Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Schwan's Corporate Giving Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Schwan's Corporate Giving Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Schwan's Corporate Giving Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.