Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Schnitzer-Novack Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$315k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$109k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Education$750kArts & Culture$394kHealth$38kCrime & Legal$20kPhilanthropy$20kHuman Services$10kHousing & Shelter$10kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $209k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$109,100
THE CAITLIN GABEL SCHOOL$50,000
CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS$50,000
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION$20,000
FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION$15,000
ST HELENA PRESCHOOL FOR ALL INC$14,400
SPECIAL OPERATIONS - FINDING KIDS$10,000
WORLDSTRIDES$10,000
CORPORATION OF FINE ARTS$10,000
PARISI HOUSE ON THE HILL$8,000
DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
B STREET THEATRE$5,000
CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER$5,000
CONGREGATION BETH SHOLOM$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GIRLS INC OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $10k → 10%NO TIME TO WASTE: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 8 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$1.1M
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+30%

Still filing today

75%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $551k · revenue +30%
  • CATLIN GABEL SCHOOL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $75k · revenue +9%
  • TF
    THE FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Center
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +23%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
2
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
3
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

4
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
5
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
6
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

7
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
8
Across the Bridge Foundation Dba Downtown College Preparatory

Dcp prepares first-generation students (first in their family to go to college) for college success. as such, dcp develops and manages college preparatory schools (grades 5-12) for students residing in and around san jose, california.

Education
9
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
10
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
11
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
12
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Breakthrough Silicon Valley and the most unlike its peers is Abby Meeske Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS — $551,040 · EducationCALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTSCATLIN GABEL SCHOOL — $75,000 · EducationCATLIN GABEL SCHOOLTHE FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Education+2 more — $34,400 · EducationIndividual grant recipient — $359,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUC BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $40,000 · OtherUC BERKELEY FOUNDATION+10 more — $72,000 · Other+10 moreEisenhower Medical Center — $25,000 · HealthBACK ON MY FEET — $10,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY — $10,000 · Human ServicesNO TIME TO WASTE — $5,000 · Human ServicesSpecial Operations - Finding Kids — $20,000 · Crime & LegalABBY MEESKE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyCROCKER ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$690,440Other$471,100Health$25,000Human Services$25,000Crime & Legal$20,000Philanthropy$20,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS — $551,040 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCATLIN GABEL SCHOOL — $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Operations - Finding Kids — $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH SILICON VALLEY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSt Helena Preschool For All Inc — $14,400 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCROCKER ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABBY MEESKE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetBACK ON MY FEET — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNO TIME TO WASTE — $5,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Schnitzer-Novack Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Catlin Gabel School0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Schnitzer-Novack Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Schnitzer-Novack Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph