Skip to content
Schneur Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Schneur Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
45
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$260k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

International$1.7MEducation$1.0MReligion$325kHealth$179kPublic Benefit$110kPhilanthropy$106kHuman Services$100kArts & Culture$97kOther$0
02FY2025 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $317k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $736k
  • $250k+1 grant · $260k
$7,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cornell University$260,000
Friends of The Israel Defense Forces$189,950
American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee$185,000
Miami Country Day School$102,000
Friends of United Hatzalah$82,000
Chabad Lubavitch Russian Center of S Florida$77,000
Mount Sinai Medical Center$50,000
US Soccer Development Fund$50,000
University of Miami$37,500
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York$37,500
The Renew Democracy Initiative Inc$35,000
Colel Chabad$32,400
Kasparov Chess Foundation Inc$30,000
American Friends of Israeli Navy Seals Inc$27,500
Roitman Chabad Center at Cornell University$26,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Challenged Athletes Inc: $1k → 11%Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $15k → 6%Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $15k → 6%RAJE USA Inc: $5k → 20%RAJE USA Inc: $5k → 20%Israel Heart2Heart Inc: $2k → 13%Michael-Ann Russell Jewish Community Center Inc: $18k → 15%RAJE USA Inc: $5k → 20%Delivering Good Inc: $1k → 17%Dorot Inc: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
NV
CA
MD
DE
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 30 repeat orgs$397k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
17

Total granted

$3.5M
$153k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
0%

Still filing today

60%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $244k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $609k · revenue +1%
  • Cornell University
    3× · 2023–2025 · $600k · revenue +27%
  • MC
    MIAMI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $310k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • ND
    NYU Daily Gift Account
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • MR
    MICHAEL-ANN RUSSELL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $18k · revenue +4%
  • WI
    WOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL ZIONIST ORGANIZATION
    one grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue -27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
6
The Jerusalem Connection
—
7
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
8
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
9
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
—
10
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
11
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
12
United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc

Uja-federation of new york (uja) cares for jews everywhere and new yorkers of all backgrounds, responds to crises close to home and far away, and shapes the jewish future. through strategic grantmaking, uja provides funding and resources…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Israel Tennis Centers Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Thelastones-Org Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
19/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,019,150 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCESThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $609,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee …+5 more: $75,300 · InternationalCornell University: $600,000 · EducationCornell UniversityMIAMI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $310,000 · EducationMIAMI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INCThe Renew Democracy Initiative Inc: $110,000 · EducationThe Renew Democracy Initiative In…University of Miami: $82,500 · EducationUniversity of Miami+5 more: $40,600 · EducationChabad Lubavitch Russian Center of S Florida: $131,000 · OtherChabad Lubavitch Russi…Mount Sinai Medical Center: $115,000 · OtherMount Sinai Medical Ce…Colel Chabad: $68,400 · OtherColel ChabadRoitman Chabad Center at Cornell University: $51,400 · OtherRoitman Chabad Center …US Soccer Development Fund: $50,000 · OtherUS Soccer Development …UW Foundation - Badger Fund: $50,000 · OtherUW Foundation - Badger…SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · OtherKasparov Chess Foundation Inc: $30,000 · Other+30 more: $240,340 · Other+30 moreFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $82,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $9,200 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $5,500 · Arts & CultureJewish Community Relations Council of New York: $75,000 · Civil RightsMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesMICHAEL-ANN RUSSELL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesRAJE-USA INC: $16,200 · Human Services+4 more: $5,600 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $30,000 · Environment
International$1,703,450Education$1,143,100Other$771,140Arts & Culture$96,700Civil Rights$75,000Human Services$69,800Environment$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,019,150 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $609,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCornell University: $600,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $310,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Renew Democracy Initiative Inc: $110,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $82,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Community Relations Council of New York: $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELI NAVY SEALS INC: $36,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMICHAEL-ANN RUSSELL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL ZIONIST ORGANIZATION: $18,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAJE-USA INC: $16,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNew York University: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMENACHEM EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $12,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF DUVDEVAN: $10,800 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $9,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FURTHERANCE OF JEWISH EDUCATION AND AFFILLIATES: $5,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHELASTONES-ORG INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetGATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL HEART2HEART INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDOROT INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDELIVERING GOOD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundBlavatnik Family Foun…Blavatnik Family Foun…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Falic Family Priv…Greater Miami Jewish …National Philanthropi…The Ojc FundThe Goldman Sachs Cha…Bracha Vehatzlacha Fo…Crain-Maling Foundati…The Slomo and Cindy S…
Jewish Communal FundNY26.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Blavatnik Family Foundation 2020 · Blavatnik Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Falic Family Private Foundation · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ojc Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Bracha Vehatzlacha Foundation Inc · Crain-Maling Foundation · The Slomo and Cindy Silvian Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schneur Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schneur Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schneur Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home