Skip to content
Schiller Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Schiller Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$153k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$680kRecreation & Sports$528kReligion$195kArts & Culture$124kEducation$110kHuman Services$100kEnvironment$33kHealth$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $120k
$21,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER$69,850
JACKSONVILLE JEWISH FOUNDATION$50,000
SONG SUMMIT FOUNDATION$21,000
ASCENT CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH$10,000
DIVIDED SKY FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $10k → 16%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $100k → 16%CAMP HASC: $50k → 16%COLLEGE SQUASH ASSOCIATION: $5k → 17%FURYK & FRIENDS: $10k → 6%JACKSONVILLE JEWISH FOUNDATION: $80k → 14%CONGREGATION B'NAI ISRAEL: $18k → 19%SONG SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $21k → 5%ASCENT CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: $10k → 8%CAMP FOR ALL KIDS: $10k → 14%ROCK AND ROLL FOREVER FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%THEIR STORIES FOUNDATION: $36k → 11%DIVIDED SKY FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF LOUISVILLE: $30k → 15%CAMP HASC: $25k → 16%COLLEGE SQUASH ASSOCIATION: $5k → 17%JACKSONVILLE JEWISH FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF UTAH: $10k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF LOUISVILLE: $25k → 15%CAMP HASC: $20k → 16%COLLEGE SQUASH ASSOCIATION: $5k → 17%JACKSONVILLE JEWISH FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $109k → 5%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF LOUISVILLE: $25k → 15%CAMP HASC: $12k → 16%COLLEGE SQUASH ASSOCIATION: $5k → 17%JACKSONVILLE JEWISH FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $93k → 5%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF LOUISVILLE: $20k → 15%JACKSONVILLE TORAH HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 14%NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $81k → 5%JEWISH FEDERATION OF JACKSONVILLE: $140k → 14%NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $78k → 5%JEWISH FEDERATION OF JACKSONVILLE: $80k → 14%NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $70k → 5%JEWISH FEDERATION OF JACKSONVILLE: $50k → 14%NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $62k → 5%JEWISH FEDERATION OF JACKSONVILLE: $50k → 14%KIMBALL ART CENTER: $50k → 5%JEWISH FEDERATION OF JACKSONVILLE: $50k → 14%PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 5%JEWISH FEDERATION OF JACKSONVILLE: $25k → 14%SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY: $18k → 5%JEWISH FEDERATION OF JACKSONVILLE: $10k → 14%SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY: $15k → 5%NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $15k → 5%SUNDANCE INSTITUTE: $10k → 5%SUNDANCE INSTITUTE: $5k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
NJ
UT
KY
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 8 repeat orgs$338k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$1.0M
$325k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+49%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $507k · revenue +50%
  • CH
    CAMP HASC INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $107k · revenue +48%
  • SL
    Summit Land Conservancy
    2× · 2019–2020 · $33k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • Cornell Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +49%
  • PC
    PARK CITY JEWISH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
  • KA
    Kimball Art Center
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Film Center

Utah film center inspires and engages diverse audiences to initiate conversation and community building through curated film exhibition, educational programs, and artist support.

Arts & Culture
2
Utah Sports Commission Foundation

The Utah Sports Commission Foundation is a charitable organization governed by an all-volunteer board of trustees consisting of statewide sports, business, and community leaders, and was created to foster national and international sports…

Recreation & Sports
3
Utah Shakespeare Festival Foundation
Arts & Culture
4
Utah Geological Foundation
—
5
Park City Education Foundation

Our mission is to fund and support educator-powered initiatives that inspire all Park City students to reach their academic and lifelong potential.

Education
6
Vail Valley Foundation

Vail valley foundation was created to enhance the quality of life in the vail valley and showcase our community to a global audience through arts, athletics, and education.

Community Improvement
7
The Salt Lake Film Society

SALT LAKE FILM SOCIETY'S MISSION IS to exhibit, create, and preserve cinema and the big screen cinematic experience.

Arts & Culture
8
Utah Athletic Foundation

Foster development of winter sports in utah and manage and maintain the utah olympic park, utah olympic oval and soldier hollow nordic center.

Recreation & Sports
9
Mountainfilm

A film festival, symposium and tour dedicated to educating and inspiring audiences about issues that matter, cultures worth exploring, environments worth preserving and conversations worth sustaining.

Arts & Culture
10
Surprise Lake Camp

The mission of surprise lake camp is to provide a high quality jewish experience for children and young adults that is safe, fun and promotes personal growth. through our summer camp and year round programs, we promote jewish identity…

—
11
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
12
The Community Foundation of Utah

We are utah's partner in philanthropy, pioneering innovation and collaboration to invest in our community today for a brighter tomorrow.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Ability Center; the most unlike its peers is Their Stories Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $507,350 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL ABILITY CENTERJACKSONVILLE JEWISH FOUNDATION: $230,000 · OtherJACKSONVILLE JEWISH FOUNDATIONJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF LOUISVILLE: $100,062 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF LOU…PARK CITY JEWISH CENTER INC: $60,000 · OtherPARK CITY JEWISH CENTER INCCOLLEGE SQUASH ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL: $18,000 · Other+6 more: $52,500 · Other+6 moreJEWISH FEDERATION & FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC: $405,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION & FOUNDAT…PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDAT…+2 more: $11,000 · PhilanthropyCornell University: $100,000 · EducationTheir Stories Foundation Inc: $36,000 · EducationCAMP HASC INC: $106,800 · ReligionKimball Art Center: $50,000 · Arts & CultureSong Summit Foundation Inc: $22,500 · Arts & CultureSundance Institute: $15,000 · Arts & CultureROCK AND SOUL FOREVER FOUNDATION INC: $10,356 · Arts & CultureSummit Land Conservancy: $32,500 · EnvironmentCamp for All Kids: $10,000 · Youth Development
Recreation & Sports$507,350Other$480,562Philanthropy$441,000Education$136,000Religion$106,800Arts & Culture$97,856Environment$32,500Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $507,350 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION & FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC: $405,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCAMP HASC INC: $106,800 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCornell University: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKimball Art Center: $50,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTheir Stories Foundation Inc: $36,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetSummit Land Conservancy: $32,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSong Summit Foundation Inc: $22,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSundance Institute: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCK AND SOUL FOREVER FOUNDATION INC: $10,356 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF UTAH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCamp for All Kids: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGator Bowl Sports Charities Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Park City Community F…Mightycause Charitabl…Jewish Communal FundVanguard Charitable E…Raymond James Charita…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…
National Philanthropic TrustPA14.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Park City Community Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schiller Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schiller Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Schiller Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Schiller Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schiller Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home