Skip to content

· Private foundation

Scheb Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$440k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Religion$694kEducation$274kHuman Services$255kHealth$75kArts & Culture$25kInternational$23kFood & Nutrition$15kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $220k
$6,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAITH EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH$85,000
YAHWEH WARRIOR LODGE INC$75,000
HOPE COLLEGE$60,000
ALPHA GRAND RAPIDS$35,000
ROOAHK FILMS$25,000
CALVARY CHURCH$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES$20,000
CALVIN UNIVERSITY$15,000
THE LADDER COMMUNITY CENTER$15,000
NATH - FREDERICK PLACE$9,000
FAITH CHRISTIAN CHURCH CAMPUS MINISTRY$6,000
GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER$5,000
KELLY BRUSH FOUNDATION$5,000
HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $181k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $5k → 10%ALPHA GRAND RAPIDS: $45k → 11%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $3k → 10%ALPHA GRAND RAPIDS: $35k → 11%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $3k → 10%ALPHA GRAND RAPIDS: $15k → 11%BENJAMIN'S HOPE: $5k → 8%ALPHA GRAND RAPIDS: $8k → 11%WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $20k → 11%WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $20k → 11%WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $15k → 11%WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
WI
MI
WY
IA
CA
AZ
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 23 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
11

Total granted

$1.3M
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

48%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOPE COLLEGE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $165k · revenue +7%
  • AG
    Alpha Grand Rapids
    4× · 2022–2025 · $103k · revenue +76%
  • CU
    CALVIN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $65k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • HO
    HOUSE OF PRAYER BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • AM
    AFFINITY MENTORING
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +9%
  • AC
    ADA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
2
Grace Alliance Christian School

We intend to focus with grace on the building of individual strengths in students, teaching and imparting strategies, tools and skills, in order to create lifelong learners.we will meet students and families where they are at in life and…

Education
3
Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education
4
Alaska Bible College

In accordance with the mandate of matthew 28:19-20 and 2 timothy 2:2, alaska bible college seeks to train servants who lead with christlike character by 1.) nurturing students in bible-based, academic programs that solidify their christian…

Education
5
Winter Haven Christian School Inc

To assist parents in developing their children to be strong in mind, spirit, and body, using christ as their example and teaching the principles found in god's holy word, the bible.

Education
6
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
7
Life Way Christian School

As a ministry of first baptist church centerton, life way christian school will enter into a parternship with christian families in order to equip young people with a biblical worldview so that they can engage the culture in a way that…

Education
8
Valor Christian High School in

To educate students in a biblical worldview, to high academic standards, with good character, as preparation to live victorious lives as christian adults.

Education
9
Lake Prince Center

A christian ministry providing vibrant living, diverse programs of outreach and compassionate care

Housing & Shelter
10
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
11
Cedar Lake Ministries

Cedar lake ministries exist to provide a life changing environment for evangelism and spiritual growth.

—
12
Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Hope Academy; the most unlike its peers is Early Bird Books. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAITH EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH: $448,000 · OtherFAITH EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $137,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCALVARY UNDENOMINATIONAL CHURCH: $89,000 · OtherCALVARY UNDENOMINATIONAL CHURCHYAHWEH WARRIOR LODGE LLC: $75,000 · OtherYAHWEH WARRIOR LODGE LLC+16 more: $206,500 · Other+16 moreHOPE COLLEGE: $165,000 · EducationHOPE COLLEGECALVIN UNIVERSITY: $65,000 · EducationCALVIN UNIVERSITYADA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SOCIETY: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $6,000 · EducationAlpha Grand Rapids: $103,000 · Human ServicesAlpha Grand R…WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $63,000 · Human ServicesWEDGWOOD CHRI…Paws With A Cause: $10,000 · Human ServicesPaws With A C…+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF PRAYER BAPTIST CHURCH: $25,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $22,500 · ReligionGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $20,000 · ReligionSTAND TO REASON: $5,000 · ReligionTHE LADDER COMMUNITY CENTER: $32,000 · PhilanthropyHOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyLIFESOURCE MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 · HealthTHE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsGILDA'S CLUB GRAND RAPIDS: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$955,500Education$246,000Human Services$181,000Religion$72,500Philanthropy$42,000Health$15,000Recreation & Sports$15,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $165,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAlpha Grand Rapids: $103,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $63,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LADDER COMMUNITY CENTER: $32,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $22,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIFESOURCE MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTHE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAFFINITY MENTORING: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetHOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTAND TO REASON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB GRAND RAPIDS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEarly Bird Books: $5,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Alpha Grand Rapids ↗
  • Who funds CALVIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE LADDER COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF PRAYER BAPTIST CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LIFESOURCE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause ↗
  • Who funds AFFINITY MENTORING ↗
  • Who funds HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ADA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds STAND TO REASON ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB GRAND RAPIDS ↗
  • Who funds Early Bird Books ↗
  • Who funds BENJAMIN'S HOPE ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Community FoundationMI17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Ufp Industries Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Barnabas Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jerry & Marcia Tubergen Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Dick and Betsy Devos Family Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scheb Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scheb Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Scheb Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Scheb Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Scheb’s filings →

    More from the funding graph