Skip to content
Scan Desert Health Plan Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Scan Desert Health Plan Inc

Keeping seniors healthy and independent

$138k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$133kHuman Services$85kHealth$40kHousing & Shelter$20kReligion$20k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $102,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $137,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES$25,000
YWCA METROPOLITAN PHOENIX$25,000
UNITED FOOD BANK$25,000
SAAVI SERVICES FOR THE BLIND$20,000
TEMPE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ASTER AGING INC: $25k → 11%FOUNDATION FOR SENIOR LIVING (FSL PROGRAMS): $20k → 11%AREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION ONE: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Azcend

AZCEND nourishes minds and bodies so that neighbors in need experience a brighter future.

Human Services
2
Pima Council on Aging

Our mission is to promote dignity and respect for aging, and to advocate for independence in the lives of Pima County's older adults and their families, now and for generations to come.

Human Services
3
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
4
Justa Center Inc

A resource and day-center for seniors, age 55+, providing guidance and support on the PATH back to housing; and CARE supportive services to prevent a return to homelessness.

—
5
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
6
Statewide Independent Living Council

Arizona Statewide Independent Living Council, AZSILC is one of 56 Statewide Independent Living Councils, SILCs which are federally mandated under the Rehabilitation Act. There is one SILC in each state and US territory. AZSILC members are…

Human Services
7
Fsl Management

Our holistic approach prepares and embraces individuals to age independently, safely, and with peace of mind.

Housing & Shelter
8
Southeastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc

Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…

Health
9
Southeastern Arizona Community Unique Services

To provide services to the elderly and disabled in the form of congregate and home delivered meals, housekeeping services, in-home nursing care, home health aides, and other services.

Health
10
Corazon Az

CORAZÓN-AZ's mission is to cultivate and foster a welcoming and safe community of Arizonans from vast faith traditions and beliefs, schools, and allied organizations; united in expanding our democracy, economic dignity, immigrant justice,…

Civil Rights
11
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
12
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of the Southwest; the most unlike its peers is Saavi Services for the Blind. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASTER AGING INC (FKA EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES INC): $25,000 · Human ServicesASTER AGING INC (FKA E…FSL PROGRAMS: $20,000 · Human ServicesFSL PROGRAMSAREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION ONE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesAREA AGENCY ON AGING R…YWCA Metropolitan Phoenix: $25,000 · OtherYWCA Metropolitan P…Interfaith Community Services: $25,000 · OtherInterfaith Communit…Arizona Diaper Bank: $20,000 · ReligionArizona Diaper …LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST: $20,000 · ReligionLUTHERAN SOCIAL…Saavi Services for the Blind: $20,000 · HealthSaavi Services …Cancer Support Community Arizona: $20,000 · HealthCancer Support …United Food Bank: $35,000 · Food & NutritionUnited Food B…Tempe Community Action Agency Inc: $32,500 · Community ImprovementTempe Commun…CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterADVANCE COMMUNITY: $20,000 · International
Human Services$60,000Other$50,000Religion$40,000Health$40,000Food & Nutrition$35,000Community Improvement$32,500Housing & Shelter$20,000International$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Food Bank: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTempe Community Action Agency Inc: $32,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYWCA Metropolitan Phoenix: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetASTER AGING INC (FKA EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES INC): $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetInterfaith Community Services: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetArizona Diaper Bank: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFSL PROGRAMS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSaavi Services for the Blind: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCancer Support Community Arizona: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetADVANCE COMMUNITY: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION ONE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Virginia G Piper Char…The Foundation for Co…Nina Mason Pulliam Ch…The Board of VisitorsValley of the Sun Uni…Thunderbirds CharitiesArea Agency on Aging …The Diane and Bruce H…BHHS Legacy FoundationPhoenix Suns Charitie…Arizona Food Bank Net…
Arizona Community FoundationAZ26.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · The Board of Visitors · Valley of the Sun United Way · Thunderbirds Charities · Area Agency on Aging Region One Inc · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · BHHS Legacy Foundation · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · Arizona Food Bank Network

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scan Desert Health Plan Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scan Desert Health Plan Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Scan Desert Health Plan Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Scan Desert Health Plan Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Scan Desert Health Plan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home