How much did SCAN DESERT HEALTH PLAN INC grant in FY2024?

SCAN DESERT HEALTH PLAN INC reported 5 grants totaling $137,500 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is SCAN DESERT HEALTH PLAN INC based?

SCAN DESERT HEALTH PLAN INC is based in CA.

SCAN DESERT HEALTH PLAN INC

Foundation Dossiers

· Public charity

SCAN DESERT HEALTH PLAN INC

Keeping seniors healthy and independent

$138k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$25k

Largest

01What you fund

0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2024.

Human Services$60kHealth$40kReligion$40kFood & Nutrition$35kCommunity Improvement$33kHousing & Shelter$20kInternational$20kOther$50k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2022

emergencyadults agesages overfoodadditionalage overmaricopa pinal

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k4 grants · $95k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$22M

Total assets

Largest grants

UNITED FOOD BANK$25,000
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES$25,000
YWCA METROPOLITAN PHOENIX$25,000
SAAVI SERVICES FOR THE BLIND$20,000
TEMPE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$7,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Oakwood Creative Care Inc

Oakwood Creative Care is the industry leader in providing diverse and innnovative care for the aging population in our community, focusing on those who experience challenges and disabilities.

Human Services

Area 1 Agency On Aging

Area 1 agency on aging provides leadership and services that support and promote healthy aging.

Human Services

Area Agency On Aging Region 9 Inc

The agency provides assistance to meet the needs of the aging and those concerned about them.

Human Services

Leadingage Arizona

The association serves its members by enchancing the lives of older adults by providing leadership, education, advocacy, and opportunities for collaboration to help them achieve their respective missions.

—

Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—

Pima Council on Aging

Our mission is to promote dignity and respect for aging, and to advocate for independence in the lives of Pima County's older adults and their families, now and for generations to come.

Human Services

Arizona Bioindustry Association Inc

Azbio supports the needs of arizona's growing life science ecosystem.

Community Improvement

Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health

Vitalyst Health Foundation

To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals & communities in az.

Health

Arizona Center for Investigative Reporting

AZCIR holds powerful people and institutions accountable by exposing injustice and systemic inequities through investigative journalism.

Arts & Culture

Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health

Area Agency On Aging of

A trusted resource to advocate, educate and empower seniors, adults with disabilities and caregivers which promotes independence, in partnership with the community.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Arizona Shelter Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aster Aging Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/13

Grantees still filing

8/13

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$60,000Other$50,000Health$40,000Religion$40,000Food & Nutrition$35,000Community Improvement$32,500Housing & Shelter$20,000International$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Valley of the Sun United Way · The Board of Visitors · BHHS Legacy Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Dignity Health · Area Agency on Aging Region One Inc · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · Arizona Food Bank Network · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SCAN DESERT HEALTH PLAN INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DIAPER BANK OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue held over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 431990345 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DIAPER BANK OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Scan Desert Health Plan Inc?

Find your warmest path to Scan Desert Health Plan Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SCAN DESERT HEALTH PLAN INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Scan Desert Health Plan Inc?

More from the funding graph

SCAN DESERT HEALTH PLAN INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Scan Desert Health Plan Inc?

More from the funding graph