How much did SAYLER-HAWKINS FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of SAYLER-HAWKINS FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k18 grants · $70k
$10k–50k5 grants · $50k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.9M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE SALVATION ARMY$10,000
VP COMMUNITY IMPACT FOUNDATION$10,000
AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE$10,000
MONARCH EFFECT FOUNDATION$10,000
RED AUTISMO$10,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$8,000
SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$8,000
BAJA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$7,000
BIRTHRIGHT COUNSELING ST LOUIS$5,000
KENRICK-GLENNON SEMINARY$5,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$5,000
RED WINDS COUNCILS$5,000
SECOND CHANCE RANCH$5,000
AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION$4,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI$4,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 8%. 93% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$878k · 37 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$878k

$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%

+134%

Still filing today

30%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalCivil RightsPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BC
BAJA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
6× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +3668% · 31% of their budget
UC
UMPQUA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
4× · 2017–2023 · $28k · revenue +141%
BC
BIRTHRIGHT COUNSELING ST LOUIS
4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +101%

Funded once

SP
SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +134%
RI
RHODE ISLAND FOOD BANK
one grant, 2020 · $10k
PV
PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA
one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Friends of the Missouri Governor's

Friends of the missouri governor's mansion is a nonprofit, non-partisan organization that collaborates with the state of missouri and its first families to preserve the residence for future generations. we manaage train and oversee…

—

Missouri Southern Foundation

The missouri southern foundation is a not-for-profit corporation, receiving and administering private and corporate contributions for the support of missouri southern state university. the foundation is governed by a board of directors…

Education

National Farmers Union Foundation

To enhance quality of life for farmers, ranchers, and rural americans.

Food & Nutrition

University of Missouri Alumni

The mu alumni association proudly supports the best interests and traditions of missouri's flagship university and its alumni worldwide. lifelong relationships are the foundation of our support. these relationships are enhanced through…

Education

Missouri Gun Rights

We have advocated for the second amendment rights of all law abiding citizens of missouri.

Civil Rights

Missouri State University Foundation

The missouri state university foundation supports missouri state university by managing and distributing resources received in fundraising campaigns and events.

Education

Missouri River Basin Lewis & Clark

To educate the general public about the flora, fauna and scientific discoveries made during the lewis & clark expedition.

Arts & Culture

St Louis Community Foundation

Administer charitable funds for the betterment of st. louis

Philanthropy

Portland State University Foundation

Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.

—

Npr Foundation

—

Missouri Western State University

Promote private giving and help the university move into the forefront of public higher education.

—

University of Southern Mississippi

Build relationships with alumni and friends in order to secure private funds for the benefit of usm.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is America First Policy Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Humane Society of Missouri. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/17

Grantees still filing

13/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$797,750Food & Nutrition$56,000International$44,500Civil Rights$20,000Animals$17,250Environment$16,500Recreation & Sports$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SAYLER-HAWKINS FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BAJA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~85 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 37.7× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 825281020 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BAJA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 85 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 31% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Sayler-Hawkins Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sayler-Hawkins Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SAYLER-HAWKINS FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Sayler-Hawkins Foundation?

More from the funding graph

SAYLER-HAWKINS FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Sayler-Hawkins Foundation?

More from the funding graph