· Private foundation
The Haines Philanthropic Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EPIC ASHLAND | $5,000 |
| DOGS FOR THE DEAF INC | $3,500 |
| ACCESS | $3,500 |
| THE HUMANE LEAGUE | $2,500 |
| OREGON FOOD BANK INC | $2,500 |
| SPAY-NEUTER YOUR PET | $2,500 |
| JPR FOUNDATION INC | $2,000 |
| CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION | $2,000 |
| ROGUE VALLEY MENTORING | $2,000 |
| HEARTISAN FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| SOUTHERN OREGON PUBLIC TELEVISION INC | $1,500 |
| BEYOND THE FENCE | $1,500 |
| ASHLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| PEACE HOUSE | $1,000 |
| ROTARY DISTRICT 5170 FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
SANCTUARY ONE6× · 2017–2022 · $750k · revenue +22% · 37% of their budget- SYSPAY-NEUTER YOUR PET5× · 2018–2025 · $31k · revenue +149%
- AACCESS8× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +232%
Funded once
- OFOPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING RESOURCES ANDgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue ×38
- APASHLAND PARKS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
PORTLAND ART MUSEUMone grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue -17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
Promote economic and social fairness by working in coalition open a broad range of issues and activities in the public arena
To foster community pride and involvement in the oregon zoo and to secure financial support for the zoo's conservation, education and animal well-being programs.
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
The Rogue Valley Humane Society provides compassionate care for stray unwanted displaced and abandoned animals and works toward ending pet overpopulation so that there will be no more homeless pets. We are committed to placing every…
Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.
Oregon Arts Watch produces independent, professional arts and culture journalism and criticism that is transparent, fair and accurate.
Oregon Wild works to protect and restore Oregon's wildlands, wildlife and waters as an enduring legacy for future generations.
The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…
We believe that the freedoms of press, speech, assembly, and religion, and the rights to due process, equal protection and privacy, are fundamental to a free people. We advance civil liberties and civil rights by activities that include…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oregon Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Spay-Neuter Your Pet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SANCTUARY ONE ↗
- Who funds ASHLAND ARTISAN GALLERY AND ART CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SPAY-NEUTER YOUR PET ↗
- Who funds ACCESS ↗
- Who funds EQUAMORE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING RESOURCES AND ↗
- Who funds PEACE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ASHLAND PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROGUE RETREAT ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Beautiful Music In The Park ↗
- Who funds DOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES ↗
- Who funds SQUAREONE VILLAGES ↗
- Who funds JPR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN OREGON FRIENDS OF HOSPICE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN OREGON LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN OREGON PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds 1ST PHOENIX COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ANIMA MUNDI PRODUCTIONS ↗
- Who funds MULTICULTURAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN OREGON ↗
- Who funds ASHLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Post Growth Institute ↗
- Who funds ROGUE VALLEY MENTORING ↗
- Who funds CULTURE OF PEACE COMMISSIONS ↗
- Who funds THE ISHAYA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROGUE VALLEY SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ROGUE ACTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE ROGUE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN NATURE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Rotary District 5170 Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Carpenter Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · The Thalden Foundation · Carrico Family Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · Careoregon Inc · Quinn Hill Foundation · Joe & Frances Naumes Family Foundation · West Family Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Haines Philanthropic Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Access — 65% of income from government
- Rogue Valley Mentoring — 42% of income from government
- Rogue Action Center — 29% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Rogue Retreat — 12% of income from government
- United Way of Jackson County Inc — 11% of income from government
- Anima Mundi Productions — 10% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Film Society Ashland Independent Film Festival — 3% of income from government
- Squareone Villages — 2% of income from government
- Equamore Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Young Mens Christian Assoc Medford dba Rv Family Ymca — 1% of income from government
- Portland Art Museum — 1% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Public Television Inc — 1% of income from government
- Rogue Valley Symphony Association — 1% of income from government
- Southern Oregon University Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Friends of Hospice — 0% of income from government
- Ashland Community Hospital Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Haines Philanthropic Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Haines Philanthropic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.