· Private foundation
Sawhney Family Fdn Dima-Etf
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $135k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MIT - MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE TECHNOLOGY | $50,000 |
| FREELAND USA FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| PARTNERS IN DEMOCRACY EDUCATION | $25,000 |
| SIKH RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| DESAI FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| ROUNDGLASS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| DISCOVERY MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| CYBER SIKH ORGANIZATION | $10,000 |
| NESSC - NEW ENGLAND SIKH STUDY CIRCLE | $10,000 |
| FIDELITY INVESTMENTS (DAF) CGF | $7,000 |
| NISHKAM SIKH WELFARE ORGANIZATION USA | $1,500 |
| UROLOGY CARE FOUNDATION INC | $1,000 |
| HEARTFELT DREAMS FOUNDATION LTD | $1,000 |
| SIKHNET INC | $1,000 |
| PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF FREELAND FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2023 · $131k · revenue +39%
- SRSikh Research Institute3× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue +17%
- TCTHE CYBER SIKH ORGANIZATION A NON-PROFIT CALIFORNIA PUBLIC BENEFIT5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +119%
Funded once
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +88%- MIMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYone grant, 2021 · $25k
- TFTIE-BOSTON FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -48%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The specific purpose, mission, and activity of the corporation is to secure funding for promoting education, research, technology development, startup incubation, acceleration, and translational research at the indian institute of science…
Shiv Nadar Foundation provides access to higher education tounderprivileged students and funds to other charitable organizations to supporteducation, research, social policies for women empowerment, affordable healthcareservices, medical…
To represent every constituency of healthcare leadership, as well as health insurance, consumer and public interest. to work collaboratively, come up with innovative solutions, champion changes throughout our organizations, and dedicate…
To bring about a transformation in the lives of brilliant but financially needy students in india.the mission is accomplished by providing financial assistance to enable students to continue and complete their higher professional education…
Improve excellence and access in higher education. Current focus is on India. Thus, Nalanda 2.0's current focus is to make India's higher education system world-class by building a world-class multidisciplinary research university,…
Us-india policy institute (usipi)undertaking policy research on diversity and inclusive developments in india and the usa. usipis vision for equal access to freedom,justice, and opportunity in india rests on its three pillars; research &…
To provide support for charitable and educational organizations and initiatives in the united states and abroad, including but not limited to organizations and initiatives focused on providing and facilitating access to high quality…
The mission is raising funds to support the development and implementation of solutions to the most pressing global problems, including the areas of water, energy, healthcare, education, and economic opportunity.
Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…
Receives donation for funding & establishing scholarships,promoting reserch & development, ecxellence in education, teaching & other related tax exempt activities
The specific purposes for which the Foundation is organized are to fund and promote overall betterment of Indian Institute Of Technology,Kanpur and its students,faculty and alumni body.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust and the most unlike its peers is Tie Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IIT DELHI ENDOWMENT FUND US ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF FREELAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Sikh Research Institute ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds THE CYBER SIKH ORGANIZATION A NON-PROFIT CALIFORNIA PUBLIC BENEFIT ↗
- Who funds UROLOGY CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ROUNDGLASS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TIE-BOSTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Goodnation Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds DESAI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SIKH COALITION ↗
- Who funds ETERNAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER CENTER ↗
- Who funds VISION-AID INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds GREATER LAWRENCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRE FOR WILDLIFE STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds GREENROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTFELT DREAMS FOUNDATION LTD ↗
- Who funds NISHKAM SIKH WELFARE ORGANIZATION USA INC ↗
- Who funds SIKH DHARMA EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dasvandh Network · Gupta Family Foundation · Saxena Family Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sawhney Family Fdn Dima-Etf funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Greater Lawrence Family Health Center Inc — 40% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Centre for Wildlife Studies Inc — 20% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Discovery Museum Inc — 3% of income from government
- Essex County Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Greenroots Inc — 1% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sawhney Family Fdn Dima-Etf?
Find your warmest path to Sawhney Family Fdn Dima-Etf through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.